From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: peter.griffin@linaro.org (Peter Griffin) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 16:03:01 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v3 4/6] [media] c8sectpfe: Update binding to reset-gpios In-Reply-To: References: <1440784362-31217-1-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> <1440784362-31217-5-git-send-email-peter.griffin@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20150902150301.GA15477@griffinp-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon-2nd> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Rob, On Tue, 01 Sep 2015, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 3:32 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas > wrote: > > Hello Peter, > > > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Peter Griffin wrote: > >> gpio.txt documents that GPIO properties should be named > >> "[-]gpios", with being the purpose of this > >> GPIO for the device. > >> > >> This change has been done as one atomic commit. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin > >> Acked-by: Lee Jones > >> --- > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/stih407-c8sectpfe.txt | 6 +++--- > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/stihxxx-b2120.dtsi | 4 ++-- > >> drivers/media/platform/sti/c8sectpfe/c8sectpfe-core.c | 2 +- > >> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/stih407-c8sectpfe.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/stih407-c8sectpfe.txt > >> index d4def76..e70d840 100644 > >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/stih407-c8sectpfe.txt > >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/stih407-c8sectpfe.txt > >> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Required properties (tsin (child) node): > >> > >> - tsin-num : tsin id of the InputBlock (must be between 0 to 6) > >> - i2c-bus : phandle to the I2C bus DT node which the demodulators & tuners on this tsin channel are connected. > >> -- rst-gpio : reset gpio for this tsin channel. > >> +- reset-gpios : reset gpio for this tsin channel. > > > > The documentation is a bit outdated, the GPIO subsystem supports both > > -gpio and -gpios, see commit: > > > > dd34c37aa3e8 ("gpio: of: Allow -gpio suffix for property names") > > Yes, because we have lots of them. > > > So it makes sense to me to use -gpio instead of -gpios in this case > > since is a single GPIO. Also rst is already a descriptive name since > > that's how many datasheets name a reset pin. I'm not saying I'm > > against this patch, just pointing out since the commit message is a > > bit misleading. > > I believe that this has been discussed at length and it was decided > that new bindings should use "-gpios" even for 1. Just like "clocks" > is always plural. Doh! Ok I will change back again to 'reset-gpios'. regards, Peter.