linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: helgaas@kernel.org (Bjorn Helgaas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm/arm64/irqchip/pci: fix PCI_MSI dependencies
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:02:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160615210211.GA17504@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8531046.3ceRqUA835@wuerfel>

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:09:38PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The PCI_MSI symbol is used inconsistently throughout the tree,
> with some drivers using 'select' and others using 'depends on',
> or using conditional selects. This keeps causing problems,
> and the latest one is a result of ARCH_ALPINE using a 'select'
> statement to enable its platform specific MSI driver but not
> enabling MSI support first:
> 
> warning: (ARCH_ALPINE) selects ALPINE_MSI which has unmet direct dependencies (PCI && PCI_MSI)
> drivers/irqchip/irq-alpine-msi.c:104:15: error: variable 'alpine_msix_domain_info' has initializer but incomplete type
>  static struct msi_domain_info alpine_msix_domain_info = {
>                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/irqchip/irq-alpine-msi.c:105:2: error: unknown field 'flags' specified in initializer
>   .flags = MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS |
>   ^
> drivers/irqchip/irq-alpine-msi.c:105:11: error: 'MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS' undeclared here (not in a function)
>   .flags = MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS |
>            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> There is little reason to enable PCI support for a platform that
> uses MSI but then leaving MSI disabled at compile time.
> 
> I sent an earlier version that used 'select PCI_MSI' everywhere
> in March, but that caused build regressions on x86.
> 
> This version instead selects PCI_MSI from irqchips that implement MSI,
> and makes PCI host bridges that use MSI on ARM depend on PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN,
> which in turn is now enabled by default on all three architectures that
> support it, whenever MSI is enabled.
> 
> I think it makes most sense to merge this patch through the PCI tree,
> as new PCI host drivers get added occasionally, and they all need to
> be adapted for this change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Suggested-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

I applied this to pci/msi, minus the crypto change that looks unrelated:

> @@ -1038,6 +1038,8 @@ source "arch/arm64/Kconfig.debug"
>  source "security/Kconfig"
>  
>  source "crypto/Kconfig"
> +if CRYPTO
>  source "arch/arm64/crypto/Kconfig"
> +endif

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-15 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-15 20:09 [PATCH] arm/arm64/irqchip/pci: fix PCI_MSI dependencies Arnd Bergmann
2016-06-15 21:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2016-06-15 21:06   ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160615210211.GA17504@localhost \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).