From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 11:57:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v15 01/10] arm64: Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API
 feature
In-Reply-To: <1467995754-32508-2-git-send-email-dave.long@linaro.org>
References: <1467995754-32508-1-git-send-email-dave.long@linaro.org>
 <1467995754-32508-2-git-send-email-dave.long@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20160715105701.GB14792@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 12:35:45PM -0400, David Long wrote:
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
> @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@
>  #define COMPAT_PT_DATA_ADDR		0x10004
>  #define COMPAT_PT_TEXT_END_ADDR		0x10008
>  #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +#include <linux/bug.h>
>  
>  /* sizeof(struct user) for AArch32 */
>  #define COMPAT_USER_SZ	296
> @@ -119,6 +120,8 @@ struct pt_regs {
>  	u64 syscallno;
>  };
>  
> +#define MAX_REG_OFFSET offsetof(struct pt_regs, pstate)
> +
>  #define arch_has_single_step()	(1)
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> @@ -147,6 +150,55 @@ struct pt_regs {
>  #define user_stack_pointer(regs) \
>  	(!compat_user_mode(regs) ? (regs)->sp : (regs)->compat_sp)
>  
> +extern int regs_query_register_offset(const char *name);
> +extern const char *regs_query_register_name(unsigned int offset);

Is regs_query_register_offset() used anywhere? I grep'ed the kernel with
these patches applied but couldn't find any use.

> +extern bool regs_within_kernel_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long addr);

This one only seems to be used in arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c. Can we
make it static and remove the declaration?

-- 
Catalin