linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: vinod.koul@intel.com (Vinod Koul)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] dmaengine: omap-dma: Complete the cookie first on transfer completion
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:09:22 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160724073922.GE9681@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160719162004.GK5783@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 05:20:04PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 03:35:18PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > On 07/18/16 13:34, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 03:42:37PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > >> Before looking for the next descriptor to start, complete the just finished
> > >> cookie.
> > > 
> > > This change will reduce performance as we no longer have an overlap
> > > between the next request starting to be dealt with in the hardware
> > > vs the previous request being completed.
> > 
> > vchan_cookie_complete() will only mark the cookie completed, adds the vd to
> > the desc_completed list (it was deleted from desc_issued list when it was
> > started by omap_dma_start_desc) and schedule the tasklet to deal with the real
> > completion later.
> > Marking the just finished descriptor/cookie done first then looking for
> > possible descriptors in the queue to start feels like a better sequence.
> 
> I deliberately arranged the code in the original order so that the next
> transfer was started on the hardware with the least amount of work by
> the CPU.  Yes, there may not be much in it, but everything you mention
> above adds to the number of CPU cycles that need to be executed before
> the next transfer can be started.

Yes that is really the right thing to do. Ideally people would want to
minimize the delay and submit the next one as soon as possible, but people
have been lazy on this and few other aspects :)

-- 
~Vinod

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-07-24  7:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-14 12:42 [PATCH 0/7] dmaengine:omap-dma: Linked List transfer for slave_sg Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-14 12:42 ` [PATCH 1/7] dmaengine: omap-dma: Simplify omap_dma_start_sg parameter list Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-14 12:42 ` [PATCH 2/7] dmaengine: omap-dma: Complete the cookie first on transfer completion Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-18 10:34   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-07-19 12:35     ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-19 16:20       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-07-19 19:23         ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-24  7:39         ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2016-07-20  6:26       ` Robert Jarzmik
2016-07-21  9:33         ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-21  9:35           ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-21  9:47           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-07-22 11:00             ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-14 12:42 ` [PATCH 3/7] dmaengine: omap-dma: Simplify omap_dma_callback Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-14 12:42 ` [PATCH 4/7] dmaengine: omap-dma: Dynamically allocate memory for lch_map Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-14 12:42 ` [PATCH 5/7] dmaengine: omap-dma: Add more debug information when freeing channel Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-14 12:42 ` [PATCH 6/7] dmaengine: omap-dma: Use pointer to omap_sg in slave_sg setup's loop Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-14 12:42 ` [PATCH 7/7] dmaengine: omap-dma: Support for LinkedList transfer of slave_sg Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-18 10:42   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-07-18 11:12     ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-18 10:31 ` [PATCH 0/7] dmaengine:omap-dma: Linked List transfer for slave_sg Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-07-18 12:07   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-07-18 12:21     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-07-18 12:30       ` Peter Ujfalusi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160724073922.GE9681@localhost \
    --to=vinod.koul@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).