linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] clk: add support for runtime pm
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 17:19:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160908001943.GC13062@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1472737551-15272-2-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com>

On 09/01, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Registers for some clocks might be located in the SOC area, which are under the
> power domain. To enable access to those registers respective domain has to be
> turned on. Additionally, registers for such clocks will usually loose its
> contents when power domain is turned off, so additional saving and restoring of
> them might be needed in the clock controller driver.
> 
> This patch adds basic infrastructure in the clocks core to allow implementing
> driver for such clocks under power domains. Clock provider can supply a
> struct device pointer, which is the used by clock core for tracking and managing
> clock's controller runtime pm state. Each clk_prepare() operation
> will first call pm_runtime_get_sync() on the supplied device, while
> clk_unprepare() will do pm_runtime_put() at the end.
> 
> Additional calls to pm_runtime_get/put functions are required to ensure that any
> register access (like calculating/chaning clock rates) will be done with clock
> controller in active runtime state.
> 
> Special handling of the case when runtime pm is disabled for clock controller's
> device is needed to let this feature work properly also during system sleep
> suspend/resume operations (runtime pm is first disabled before entering sleep
> state's, but controller is usually still operational until its suspend pm
> callback is called).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>

My "knee jerk" concern is that we're going to take a runtime PM
lock underneath the prepare lock. That seems like a situation
where we could hit a lock inversion if the runtime PM callbacks
themselves acquire the prepare lock by calling clk APIs? But this
concern is false right? We release the runtime PM lock before
calling the PM callback, so we shouldn't hit any deadlock and
lockdep won't complain?

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-09-08  0:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-01 13:45 [PATCH 0/5] Add runtime PM support for clocks (on Exynos SoC example) Marek Szyprowski
2016-09-01 13:45 ` [PATCH 1/5] clk: add support for runtime pm Marek Szyprowski
2016-09-01 15:10   ` kbuild test robot
2016-09-01 15:10   ` [PATCH] clk: fix boolreturn.cocci warnings kbuild test robot
2016-09-08  0:19   ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
     [not found]     ` <CGME20160912101857eucas1p29b2bbd5ac0eda92284091ad1b86decc4@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2016-09-12 10:18       ` [PATCH 1/5] clk: add support for runtime pm Marek Szyprowski
2016-09-12 22:31         ` Stephen Boyd
2016-09-13  9:07           ` Marek Szyprowski
2016-09-14 21:39             ` Stephen Boyd
2016-09-15  8:32               ` Marek Szyprowski
2016-09-13  7:24     ` Ulf Hansson
2016-09-13  8:49   ` Ulf Hansson
2016-09-13 13:13     ` Marek Szyprowski
2016-09-13 15:03       ` Ulf Hansson
2016-09-14 10:11         ` Marek Szyprowski
2016-09-01 13:45 ` [PATCH 2/5] clock: samsung: " Marek Szyprowski
2016-09-01 13:45 ` [PATCH 3/5] clocks: exynos4x12: add runtime pm support for ISP clocks Marek Szyprowski
2016-09-01 21:49   ` kbuild test robot
2016-09-01 13:45 ` [PATCH 4/5] ARM: dts: exynos: add support for ISP power domain to exynos4x12 clocks device Marek Szyprowski
2016-09-08  0:22   ` Stephen Boyd
     [not found]     ` <CGME20160912102332eucas1p145e79669788329b44343da62dcbe50ca@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2016-09-12 10:23       ` Marek Szyprowski
2016-09-12 22:28         ` Stephen Boyd
2016-09-15 12:06           ` Marek Szyprowski
2016-09-15 14:13             ` Ulf Hansson
2016-09-01 13:45 ` [PATCH 5/5] clocks: exynos5433: add runtime pm support Marek Szyprowski
2016-09-01 16:55   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2016-09-01 23:00   ` kbuild test robot
2016-09-02 19:05   ` kbuild test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160908001943.GC13062@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).