From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH/RFC 3/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Implement shallow suspend mode
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 18:18:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170221181849.GG8605@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdX_pot+=rJfY1Kor4gYD4CgBYivngzCLwV36LELx+AA5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 07:06:04PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 05:32:50PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> How can Linux know if using "deep" suspend will allow to wake-up the system
> >> according to configured wake-up sources, or not?
> >
> > My understanding is that if a device can wake the system from
> > PSCI_SYSTEM_SUSPEND, it should be described in the DT as a wakeup source
> > [1]. So we should be able to determine the set of devices which can wake
> > the system from a suspend. We shouldn't assume that other devices can
> > (though I don't precisely what we do currently).
> >
> > Otherwise, where PSCI_CPU_SUSPEND, we'd expect that most devices
> > (barring cpu-local timers) can wake up CPUs, and hence the system, by
> > raising an interrupt.
>
> > [1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/wakeup-source.txt
>
> "wakeup-source" in DT is used as a mix of hardware description and software
> policy. E.g. some keys on a keyboard may have it, others don't, while there's
> not always a technical reason for that.
>
> Also, it doesn't specify from which suspend state it can wake-up.
Joy.
If we need to do something here, we should clarify the semantics of
wakeup-source and/or introduce a property which is explicitly for the
purpose of expressing HW capability to wake up from a specific power
state.
> On top of that, the Linux PM subsystem allows to configure wakeup by writing
> "enabled" to a device's "wakeup" file in sysfs. Or you can use ethtool for
> Wake-on-LAN.
Sure; userspace can always do something silly here.
As I mentioned in my other reply, we could/should add an interface to
allow userspace to determine if it has a guaranteed wakeup, which would
allow us to do the right thing.
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-21 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-20 20:33 [PATCH/RFC 0/6] PSCI: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts power Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-20 20:33 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/6] alarmtimer: Postpone wake-up source registration until really available Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-20 20:33 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/6] PM / Wakeup: Add wakeup_source_available() Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-20 20:33 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Implement shallow suspend mode Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-21 10:42 ` Sudeep Holla
2017-02-21 16:23 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-21 16:51 ` Sudeep Holla
2017-02-21 11:07 ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-21 11:14 ` Sudeep Holla
2017-02-21 16:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-21 17:20 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-21 18:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-21 18:18 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2017-02-21 18:23 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-21 17:22 ` Sudeep Holla
2017-02-22 13:47 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-22 14:35 ` Sudeep Holla
2017-02-20 20:33 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/6] drivers: firmware: psci: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts power Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-21 10:50 ` Sudeep Holla
2017-02-21 16:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-21 16:49 ` Sudeep Holla
2017-02-21 11:07 ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-21 16:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-21 17:54 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-21 17:48 ` Mark Rutland
2017-02-22 14:05 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-22 14:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-02-20 20:33 ` [PATCH/RFC 5/6] arm64: dts: r8a7795: Fix non-PMIC wake-up sources Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-20 20:33 ` [PATCH/RFC 6/6] arm64: dts: r8a7796: " Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-21 10:38 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/6] PSCI: Fix non-PMIC wake-up if SYSTEM_SUSPEND cuts power Sudeep Holla
2017-02-21 16:21 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-21 16:45 ` Sudeep Holla
2017-02-21 17:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-21 17:51 ` Sudeep Holla
2017-02-21 18:27 ` Sudeep Holla
2017-02-21 18:45 ` Sudeep Holla
2017-02-22 1:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-02-22 11:03 ` Sudeep Holla
2017-02-22 13:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-22 14:32 ` Sudeep Holla
2017-02-22 14:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-02-22 15:24 ` Sudeep Holla
2017-02-23 15:26 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-23 15:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-23 15:58 ` Sudeep Holla
2017-02-23 15:53 ` Sudeep Holla
2017-02-22 13:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-02-22 14:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170221181849.GG8605@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).