linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: krzk@kernel.org (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] mfd: exynos-lpass: Pinctrl dependency
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 11:57:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170404095751.GA28977@kozik-book> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170404095054.7m6nf6bxweskabuu@dell>

On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 10:50:54AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Apr 2017, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Hi Lee,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> This is dependency for mfd/exynos-lpass driver changes from Marek Szyprowski.
> > >> That's a material for v4.12 and I will be pushing this later to Linus Walleij.
> > >
> > > This does not work, and *may* still break.
> > >
> > > The only way to guarantee the order of the patches is to have them
> > > *all* as part of the pull-request.  Not just some of them.
> > 
> > What do you mean exactly? If these two patches come through my tree
> > first, then everything will work fine because they do not break any
> > other stuff.
> > 
> > If you pull it and apply the rest on top, then it should also work
> > without problems because your history will contain everything needed
> > in proper order.
> > 
> > In both cases bisectability is preserved. Did I missed something?
> 
> Okay, so you're suggesting that I rebase MFD *on-top* of your PR.  That
> does work for me because I insist on being able to re-work my tree at
> any time.  However, be aware that some Maintainers do not work this
> way, thus *normally* you will have to send PR containing all of the
> dependant patches.

You could either rebased on top of this PR or merge it before applying
rest of patches. It does not matter because in both cases all dependant
patches will be after the dependency. Also in both cases you will be
sending them in your PR.

You can then rebase your stuff as well, keeping only the external
commits untouced and merged.

Really, that does not differ from all your stable immutable branches you
have been providing for other folks.


Best regards,
Krzysztof

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-04  9:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20170323080346eucas1p216eec41325d220774ecec05b397e83a6@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2017-03-23  8:03 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] Pad retentions support for Exynos5433 Marek Szyprowski
     [not found]   ` <CGME20170323080347eucas1p2d0340709543b3ce128281e5a490216d4@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2017-03-23  8:03     ` [PATCH v4 1/6] pinctrl: samsung: Ensure that pad retention is disabled on driver init Marek Szyprowski
2017-03-23 19:14       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
     [not found]   ` <CGME20170323080348eucas1p188a598869b71a1302160df46839b3ca8@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2017-03-23  8:03     ` [PATCH v4 2/6] pinctrl: samsung: Add support for pad retention control for Exynos5433 SoCs Marek Szyprowski
2017-03-23 19:15       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
     [not found]   ` <CGME20170323080348eucas1p29d1fb4eb06e4785d20341be7a374bfb3@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2017-03-23  8:03     ` [PATCH v4 3/6] mfd: exynos-lpass: Remove pad retention control Marek Szyprowski
2017-04-11 12:02       ` Lee Jones
2017-04-19 11:00         ` Marek Szyprowski
2017-04-24 10:35           ` Lee Jones
     [not found]   ` <CGME20170323080349eucas1p11187befd30ab70554373fb6d818cd851@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2017-03-23  8:03     ` [PATCH v4 4/6] mfd: exynos-lpass: Add support for clocks Marek Szyprowski
2017-04-11 12:03       ` Lee Jones
     [not found]   ` <CGME20170323080349eucas1p24093d55f6654274e0c0bdf02d477c906@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2017-03-23  8:03     ` [PATCH v4 5/6] mfd: exynos-lpass: Add missing remove() function Marek Szyprowski
2017-04-11 12:03       ` Lee Jones
     [not found]   ` <CGME20170323080350eucas1p273814a2f183f04f180f8f2a2a362b86e@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2017-03-23  8:03     ` [PATCH v4 6/6] mfd: exynos-lpass: Add runtime PM support Marek Szyprowski
2017-04-11 12:03       ` Lee Jones
2017-03-28  9:22   ` [PATCH v4 0/6] Pad retentions support for Exynos5433 Linus Walleij
2017-03-28 10:14     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2017-03-28 15:42   ` [GIT PULL] mfd: exynos-lpass: Pinctrl dependency Krzysztof Kozlowski
2017-04-03 10:18     ` Lee Jones
2017-04-04  8:23       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2017-04-04  9:50         ` Lee Jones
2017-04-04  9:57           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2017-04-11 11:57             ` Lee Jones
2017-04-11 11:59     ` Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170404095751.GA28977@kozik-book \
    --to=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).