From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: davem@davemloft.net (David Miller)
Date: Sat, 06 May 2017 14:38:16 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: arch: arm: bpf: Converting cBPF to eBPF for arm 32 bit
In-Reply-To: <CAHgaXdK1XjDnhTqtk=nCq2crrigHiuCaLhF+1GupJt9bPThwZw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHgaXdJ1M4W3p9=B2hJmtxByPsA5-XHae8U6YtDH_2r_XMaR5A@mail.gmail.com>
 <58E639E0.1010700@iogearbox.net>
 <CAHgaXdK1XjDnhTqtk=nCq2crrigHiuCaLhF+1GupJt9bPThwZw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20170506.143816.2259768618578706384.davem@davemloft.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

From: Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 22:18:16 +0530

> Hi Daniel,
> 
> Thanks for the last reply about the testing of eBPF JIT.
> 
> I have one issue though, I am not able to find what BPF_ABS and
> BPF_IND instruction does exactly.

They are not instructions, they are modifiers for the BPF_LD
instruction which indicate an SKB load is to be performed.

You never need to ask what a BPF instruction does, it is clear
defined in the BPF interperter found in kernel/bpf/core.c

Look for the case statement LD_ABS_W and friends in __bpf_prog_run().