linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 3/6] ACPI/IORT: Ignore all errors except EPROBE_DEFER
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 10:06:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170530090652.GA1767@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <68bc9be5-22df-e7af-3fcd-182e935e681c@codeaurora.org>

On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 10:36:42AM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> On 5/28/2017 12:48 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday, May 27, 2017 07:17:42 PM Sricharan R wrote:
> >> While deferring the probe of IOMMU masters, xlate and
> >> add_device callbacks called from iort_iommu_configure
> >> can pass back error values like -ENODEV, which means
> >> the IOMMU cannot be connected with that master for real
> >> reasons. Before the IOMMU probe deferral, all such errors
> >> were ignored. Now all those errors are propagated back,
> >> killing the master's probe for such errors. Instead ignore
> >> all the errors except EPROBE_DEFER, which is the only one
> >> of concern and let the master work without IOMMU, thus
> >> restoring the old behavior. Also make explicit that
> >> acpi_dma_configure handles only -EPROBE_DEFER from
> >> iort_iommu_configure.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 5a1bb638d567 ("drivers: acpi: Handle IOMMU lookup failure with deferred probing or error")
> >> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 6 ++++++
> >>  drivers/acpi/scan.c       | 4 ++--
> >>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> >> index c5fecf9..16e101f 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> >> @@ -782,6 +782,12 @@ const struct iommu_ops *iort_iommu_configure(struct device *dev)
> >>  	if (err)
> >>  		ops = ERR_PTR(err);
> >>  
> >> +	/* Ignore all other errors apart from EPROBE_DEFER */
> >> +	if (IS_ERR(ops) && (PTR_ERR(ops) != -EPROBE_DEFER)) {
> >> +		dev_dbg(dev, "Adding to IOMMU failed: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(ops));
> >> +		ops = NULL;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >>  	return ops;
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> >> index e39ec7b..3a10d757 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> >> @@ -1371,8 +1371,8 @@ int acpi_dma_configure(struct device *dev, enum dev_dma_attr attr)
> >>  	iort_set_dma_mask(dev);
> >>  
> >>  	iommu = iort_iommu_configure(dev);
> >> -	if (IS_ERR(iommu))
> >> -		return PTR_ERR(iommu);
> >> +	if (IS_ERR(iommu) && PTR_ERR(iommu) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> >> +		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> >>  
> >>  	size = max(dev->coherent_dma_mask, dev->coherent_dma_mask + 1);
> >>  	/*
> >>
> > 
> > ACK for the scan.c change and I'm assuming this to go in via ARM64.
> > 
> 
> Thanks for the ACK, should go through the IOMMU tree, since this fixes the IOMMU probe deferral
> that got merged through it.

Yes and it would be good to get them merged for -rc4 given that there
are bug fixes there, I agree the IOMMU tree is the way they should
go upstream.

Lorenzo

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-30  9:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-27 13:47 [PATCH v6 1/6] iommu: of: Fix check for returning EPROBE_DEFER Sricharan R
2017-05-27 13:47 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] iommu: of: Ignore all errors except EPROBE_DEFER Sricharan R
2017-05-27 13:47 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] ACPI/IORT: " Sricharan R
2017-05-27 19:18   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-05-29  5:06     ` Sricharan R
2017-05-30  9:06       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2017-05-27 13:47 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] ARM: dma-mapping: Don't tear down third-party mappings Sricharan R
2017-05-27 13:47 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] ACPI/IORT: Move the check to get iommu_ops from translated fwspec Sricharan R
2017-05-27 13:47 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] arm: dma-mapping: Reset the device's dma_ops Sricharan R
2017-05-30  9:32 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] iommu: of: Fix check for returning EPROBE_DEFER Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170530090652.GA1767@red-moon \
    --to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).