From: drjones@redhat.com (Andrew Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 08/37] KVM: arm64: Defer restoring host VFP state to vcpu_put
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 14:15:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171107131550.33u2igwikbem67un@kamzik.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171012104141.26902-9-christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:41:12PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> Avoid saving the guest VFP registers and restoring the host VFP
> registers on every exit from the VM. Only when we're about to run
> userspace or other threads in the kernel do we really have to switch the
> state back to the host state.
>
> We still initially configure the VFP registers to trap when entering the
> VM, but the difference is that we now leave the guest state in the
> hardware registers while running the VM.
running the host.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 5 ++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 +++
> arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S | 3 +++
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c | 47 +++++++++++-------------------------
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c | 21 +++++++++++++---
> 6 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> index 1fbfe96..630dd60 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> @@ -56,6 +56,11 @@ static inline unsigned long *vcpu_hcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return (unsigned long *)&vcpu->arch.hcr_el2;
> }
>
> +static inline bool vcpu_el1_is_32bit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + return (!(vcpu->arch.hcr_el2 & HCR_RW));
nit: no need for the outer ().
> +}
> +
> static inline unsigned long *vcpu_pc(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> return (unsigned long *)&vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->regs.pc;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 7d3bfa7..5e09eb9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -210,6 +210,9 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> /* Guest debug state */
> u64 debug_flags;
>
> + /* 1 if the guest VFP state is loaded into the hardware */
> + u64 guest_vfp_loaded;
> +
Is there a chance we'll want other flags like this? Should we just make
this a lazy state flags field with the (currently only) flag VFP? If not,
then a bool would be nicer, although I see below the u64 was chosen in
order for the 'str' to be used.
> /*
> * We maintain more than a single set of debug registers to support
> * debugging the guest from the host and to maintain separate host and
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> index 612021d..9946732 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> @@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ int main(void)
> DEFINE(CPU_GP_REGS, offsetof(struct kvm_cpu_context, gp_regs));
> DEFINE(CPU_USER_PT_REGS, offsetof(struct kvm_regs, regs));
> DEFINE(CPU_FP_REGS, offsetof(struct kvm_regs, fp_regs));
> + DEFINE(VCPU_GUEST_VFP_LOADED, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.guest_vfp_loaded));
> DEFINE(VCPU_FPEXC32_EL2, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.ctxt.sys_regs[FPEXC32_EL2]));
> DEFINE(VCPU_HOST_CONTEXT, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.host_cpu_context));
> DEFINE(HOST_CONTEXT_VCPU, offsetof(struct kvm_cpu_context, __hyp_running_vcpu));
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
> index 76cd48f..b3e7191 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/entry.S
> @@ -185,6 +185,9 @@ alternative_endif
> add x0, x2, #CPU_GP_REG_OFFSET(CPU_FP_REGS)
> bl __fpsimd_restore_state
>
> + mov x0, #1
> + str x0, [x3, #VCPU_GUEST_VFP_LOADED]
> +
> // Skip restoring fpexc32 for AArch64 guests
> mrs x1, hcr_el2
> tbnz x1, #HCR_RW_SHIFT, 1f
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> index 7703d63..ef05c59 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> @@ -23,43 +23,31 @@
> #include <asm/kvm_hyp.h>
> #include <asm/fpsimd.h>
>
> -static bool __hyp_text __fpsimd_enabled_nvhe(void)
> -{
> - return !(read_sysreg(cptr_el2) & CPTR_EL2_TFP);
> -}
> -
> -static bool __hyp_text __fpsimd_enabled_vhe(void)
> -{
> - return !!(read_sysreg(cpacr_el1) & CPACR_EL1_FPEN);
> -}
> -
> -static hyp_alternate_select(__fpsimd_is_enabled,
> - __fpsimd_enabled_nvhe, __fpsimd_enabled_vhe,
> - ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN);
> -
> -bool __hyp_text __fpsimd_enabled(void)
> -{
> - return __fpsimd_is_enabled()();
> -}
> -
> -static void __hyp_text __activate_traps_vhe(void)
> +static void __hyp_text __activate_traps_vhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> u64 val;
>
> val = read_sysreg(cpacr_el1);
> val |= CPACR_EL1_TTA;
> - val &= ~CPACR_EL1_FPEN;
> + if (vcpu->arch.guest_vfp_loaded)
> + val |= CPACR_EL1_FPEN;
> + else
> + val &= ~CPACR_EL1_FPEN;
> write_sysreg(val, cpacr_el1);
>
> write_sysreg(__kvm_hyp_vector, vbar_el1);
> }
>
> -static void __hyp_text __activate_traps_nvhe(void)
> +static void __hyp_text __activate_traps_nvhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> u64 val;
>
> val = CPTR_EL2_DEFAULT;
> - val |= CPTR_EL2_TTA | CPTR_EL2_TFP;
> + val |= CPTR_EL2_TTA;
> + if (vcpu->arch.guest_vfp_loaded)
> + val &= ~CPTR_EL2_TFP;
> + else
> + val |= CPTR_EL2_TFP;
> write_sysreg(val, cptr_el2);
> }
>
> @@ -81,7 +69,8 @@ static void __hyp_text __activate_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * it will cause an exception.
> */
> val = vcpu->arch.hcr_el2;
> - if (!(val & HCR_RW) && system_supports_fpsimd()) {
> + if (vcpu_el1_is_32bit(vcpu) && system_supports_fpsimd() &&
> + !vcpu->arch.guest_vfp_loaded) {
> write_sysreg(1 << 30, fpexc32_el2);
> isb();
> }
> @@ -97,7 +86,7 @@ static void __hyp_text __activate_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> write_sysreg(0, pmselr_el0);
> write_sysreg(ARMV8_PMU_USERENR_MASK, pmuserenr_el0);
> write_sysreg(vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2, mdcr_el2);
> - __activate_traps_arch()();
> + __activate_traps_arch()(vcpu);
> }
>
> static void __hyp_text __deactivate_traps_vhe(void)
> @@ -273,7 +262,6 @@ int __hyp_text __kvm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt;
> struct kvm_cpu_context *guest_ctxt;
> - bool fp_enabled;
> u64 exit_code;
>
> vcpu = kern_hyp_va(vcpu);
> @@ -355,8 +343,6 @@ int __hyp_text __kvm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> /* 0 falls through to be handled out of EL2 */
> }
>
> - fp_enabled = __fpsimd_enabled();
> -
> __sysreg_save_guest_state(guest_ctxt);
> __sysreg32_save_state(vcpu);
> __timer_disable_traps(vcpu);
> @@ -367,11 +353,6 @@ int __hyp_text __kvm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> __sysreg_restore_host_state(host_ctxt);
>
> - if (fp_enabled) {
> - __fpsimd_save_state(&guest_ctxt->gp_regs.fp_regs);
> - __fpsimd_restore_state(&host_ctxt->gp_regs.fp_regs);
> - }
> -
> __debug_save_state(vcpu, kern_hyp_va(vcpu->arch.debug_ptr), guest_ctxt);
> /*
> * This must come after restoring the host sysregs, since a non-VHE
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
> index b7438c8..c4a3714 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>
> #include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_hyp.h>
>
> /* Yes, this does nothing, on purpose */
> @@ -137,6 +138,11 @@ void __hyp_text __sysreg_restore_guest_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
> __sysreg_restore_common_state(ctxt);
> }
>
> +static void __hyp_text __fpsimd32_save_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
> +{
> + ctxt->sys_regs[FPEXC32_EL2] = read_sysreg(fpexc32_el2);
> +}
> +
> void __hyp_text __sysreg32_save_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> u64 *spsr, *sysreg;
> @@ -155,9 +161,6 @@ void __hyp_text __sysreg32_save_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> sysreg[DACR32_EL2] = read_sysreg(dacr32_el2);
> sysreg[IFSR32_EL2] = read_sysreg(ifsr32_el2);
>
> - if (__fpsimd_enabled())
> - sysreg[FPEXC32_EL2] = read_sysreg(fpexc32_el2);
> -
> if (vcpu->arch.debug_flags & KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY)
> sysreg[DBGVCR32_EL2] = read_sysreg(dbgvcr32_el2);
> }
> @@ -209,4 +212,16 @@ void kvm_vcpu_load_sysregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> */
> void kvm_vcpu_put_sysregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> + struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt = vcpu->arch.host_cpu_context;
> + struct kvm_cpu_context *guest_ctxt = &vcpu->arch.ctxt;
> +
> + /* Restore host FP/SIMD state */
> + if (vcpu->arch.guest_vfp_loaded) {
> + if (vcpu_el1_is_32bit(vcpu))
> + kvm_call_hyp(__fpsimd32_save_state,
> + kern_hyp_va(guest_ctxt));
nit: might be nice to use {} since we need two lines.
> + __fpsimd_save_state(&guest_ctxt->gp_regs.fp_regs);
> + __fpsimd_restore_state(&host_ctxt->gp_regs.fp_regs);
> + vcpu->arch.guest_vfp_loaded = 0;
> + }
> }
> --
> 2.9.0
>
Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-07 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 127+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-12 10:41 [PATCH 00/37] Optimize KVM/ARM for VHE systems Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 01/37] KVM: arm64: Avoid storing the vcpu pointer on the stack Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 15:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-12 17:02 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-13 11:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-11-23 20:59 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-27 11:11 ` James Morse
2017-11-29 18:20 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-06 17:22 ` Andrew Jones
2017-11-07 8:24 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 02/37] KVM: arm64: Rework hyp_panic for VHE and non-VHE Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 15:55 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-12 17:06 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 03/37] KVM: arm64: Move HCR_INT_OVERRIDE to default HCR_EL2 guest flag Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 16:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 04/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Get rid of vcpu->arch.irq_lines Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 16:24 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-11-06 17:58 ` Andrew Jones
2017-11-14 12:17 ` Julien Thierry
2017-11-16 16:11 ` Julien Thierry
2017-11-26 16:04 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 05/37] KVM: Record the executing ioctl number on the vcpu struct Christoffer Dall
2017-10-13 17:13 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-10-13 17:31 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-13 18:38 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-10-13 18:51 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 10:45 ` Andrew Jones
2017-11-22 20:28 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 06/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Only load/put VCPU state for KVM_RUN Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 07/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Add kvm_vcpu_load_sysregs and kvm_vcpu_put_sysregs Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 10:56 ` Andrew Jones
2017-11-07 11:10 ` Andrew Jones
2017-11-22 20:34 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-23 11:08 ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 08/37] KVM: arm64: Defer restoring host VFP state to vcpu_put Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 13:15 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2017-11-26 16:24 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-15 16:04 ` Andrew Jones
2017-11-26 16:17 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-27 8:32 ` Andrew Jones
2017-11-25 7:52 ` Yury Norov
2017-11-26 16:17 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-26 18:58 ` Yury Norov
2017-11-26 19:18 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-27 6:25 ` Yury Norov
2017-11-30 19:07 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 09/37] KVM: arm64: Move debug dirty flag calculation out of world switch Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 14:09 ` Andrew Jones
2017-11-25 8:09 ` Yury Norov
2017-12-01 17:25 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-12-03 13:17 ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 10/37] KVM: arm64: Slightly improve debug save/restore functions Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 14:22 ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-01 17:51 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-14 16:42 ` Julien Thierry
2017-12-01 15:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-12-06 15:38 ` Julien Thierry
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 11/37] KVM: arm64: Improve debug register save/restore flow Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 14:48 ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-01 17:52 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-12-03 13:49 ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-03 20:47 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 12/37] KVM: arm64: Factor out fault info population and gic workarounds Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 15:12 ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 13/37] KVM: arm64: Introduce VHE-specific kvm_vcpu_run Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 15:25 ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-01 18:10 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 14/37] KVM: arm64: Remove kern_hyp_va() use in VHE switch function Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 16:07 ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 15/37] KVM: arm64: Don't deactivate VM on VHE systems Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 16:14 ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-03 19:27 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 16/37] KVM: arm64: Remove noop calls to timer save/restore from VHE switch Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 16:25 ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-03 19:27 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 17/37] KVM: arm64: Move userspace system registers into separate function Christoffer Dall
2017-11-08 9:32 ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-03 19:36 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 18/37] KVM: arm64: Rewrite sysreg alternatives to static keys Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 19/37] KVM: arm64: Introduce separate VHE/non-VHE sysreg save/restore functions Christoffer Dall
2017-11-08 10:31 ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 20/37] KVM: arm64: Unify non-VHE host/guest sysreg save and restore functions Christoffer Dall
2017-11-08 10:39 ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-03 19:41 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 21/37] KVM: arm64: Don't save the host ELR_EL2 and SPSR_EL2 on VHE systems Christoffer Dall
2017-11-08 17:03 ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-03 19:45 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 22/37] KVM: arm64: Change 32-bit handling of VM system registers Christoffer Dall
2017-11-13 16:25 ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 23/37] KVM: arm64: Prepare to handle traps on deferred VM sysregs Christoffer Dall
2017-11-13 17:54 ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-03 19:50 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-12-04 10:05 ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 24/37] KVM: arm64: Prepare to handle traps on deferred EL0 sysregs Christoffer Dall
2017-11-15 9:25 ` Julien Thierry
2017-12-03 19:51 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 25/37] KVM: arm64: Prepare to handle traps on remaining deferred EL1 sysregs Christoffer Dall
2017-11-13 18:56 ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-03 20:29 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 26/37] KVM: arm64: Prepare to handle traps on deferred AArch32 sysregs Christoffer Dall
2017-11-13 19:07 ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-03 20:35 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 27/37] KVM: arm64: Defer saving/restoring system registers to vcpu load/put on VHE Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 28/37] KVM: arm64: Move common VHE/non-VHE trap config in separate functions Christoffer Dall
2017-11-25 10:43 ` Yury Norov
2017-11-25 10:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 29/37] KVM: arm64: Configure FPSIMD traps on vcpu load/put for VHE Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 30/37] KVM: arm64: Configure c15, PMU, and debug register traps on cpu " Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 31/37] KVM: arm64: Separate activate_traps and deactive_traps for VHE and non-VHE Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 32/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Handle VGICv2 save/restore from the main VGIC code Christoffer Dall
2017-11-15 17:50 ` Andre Przywara
2017-11-26 10:29 ` Yury Norov
2017-11-26 19:46 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-30 12:09 ` Yury Norov
2017-11-26 19:37 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 33/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Move arm64-only vgic-v2-sr.c file to arm64 Christoffer Dall
2017-11-15 17:52 ` Andre Przywara
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 34/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Handle VGICv3 save/restore from the main VGIC code on VHE Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 35/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Get rid of vgic_elrsr Christoffer Dall
2017-11-26 14:39 ` Yury Norov
2017-11-26 19:53 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 36/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Move VGIC APR save/restore to vgic put/load Christoffer Dall
2017-11-26 15:09 ` Yury Norov
2017-11-26 19:55 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 37/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Avoid VGICv3 save/restore on VHE with no IRQs Christoffer Dall
2017-11-30 18:33 ` Yury Norov
2017-12-03 20:38 ` Christoffer Dall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171107131550.33u2igwikbem67un@kamzik.brq.redhat.com \
--to=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).