From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F96C43387 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 00:20:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4374421848 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 00:20:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="th/PjC2m"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="fyY+rJPN" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4374421848 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=FLhnoB0b/Cv5Q+kMQJyfV3F1opFtoZlazx7yfdB77Ig=; b=th/PjC2mJqUPDFv/FxpgiKCul 2oC74iix5SCQ3G9KzTo88O25CE9FrMhlj+aeoN/dgHMpzuGXAZuFbPt+gZEQShynl6J9k1rFZQ/RA fjeBt+40DLTMyqBvVwa+WMyWmhRlQfVJJwWCk0ObWXerbvUmyZd22L5u6U1JPAqgWaKcCu67WY0Vh Z3Q8Ry8ClDhPdZUABU67YCRL9niUkbs2uQSYiPUX1o7GSwMbICgYx/mUSSoLOgH+BciFoFaTJtMPT Dym/luq0nKK9SiJIKELjCgQPtdB22i7Plp9egyX8/zudrqn18JGLS7qY+JiXw7NpyGVhRe0A/yBVr UxQKK/uEg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gZ37s-0006Hd-AH; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 00:20:44 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gZ37o-0006GL-N1 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 00:20:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E12820874; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 00:20:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1545092429; bh=JAIgOIQfFXT9a1LOTaslhoxR4QxEfjnFoh9E9BsFKjQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=fyY+rJPNl9WQ5S9QTFuxS8KGRppfxeAJhjpUXUoEhQnCfkajXtfxX06e42Zge6BLh MIrDd24i/4eshp79OXy9Oqn/4sU/cdswE8M90yaseRVpnzItDqF1jA7nUnSFsZr91K S+Dp4fYUoum/K7CLKfC8bcv54hF/MKuf+Jo2lmJM= Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 19:20:28 -0500 From: Sasha Levin To: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] v4.19-stable randconfig fixes Message-ID: <20181218002028.GX2746@sasha-vm> References: <20181214221023.3878670-1-arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181214221023.3878670-1-arnd@arndb.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20181217_162040_768470_3A58EF56 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.69 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, Peter Zijlstra , David Brown , Srinivas Kandagatla , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, "James E.J. Bottomley" , Daniel Drake , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Jens Frederich , openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org, Ingo Molnar , Andy Gross , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Lubomir Rintel , dou_liyang@163.com, Rob Herring , bp@alien8.de, Vincent Guittot , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "Martin K. Petersen" , Andrew Jeffery , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Rob Clark , freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 11:10:05PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >Hi Greg, > >I did some randconfig testing on linux-4.19 arm/arm64/x86. So far I needed >27 patches, most of which are also still needed in mainline Linux. I >had submitted some before, and others were not submitted previously >for some reason. I'll try to get those fixed in mainline and then >make sure we get them into 4.19 as well. > >This series for now contains four patches that did make it into mainline: > >2e6ae11dd0d1 ("slimbus: ngd: mark PM functions as __maybe_unused") >33f49571d750 ("staging: olpc_dcon: add a missing dependency") >0eeec01488da ("scsi: raid_attrs: fix unused variable warning") >11d4afd4ff66 ("sched/pelt: Fix warning and clean up IRQ PELT config") > >Feel free to either cherry-pick those from mainline or apply the >patch from this series, whichever works best for you. > >The other three patches are for warnings in code that got removed in >mainline kernels: > >3e9efc3299dd ("i2c: aspeed: Handle master/slave combined irq events properly") >972910948fb6 ("ARM: dts: qcom: Remove Arrow SD600 eval board") >effec874792f ("drm/msm/dpu: Remove dpu_dbg") > >My feeling was that it's safer to just address the warning by fixing >the code correctly in each of these cases, but if you disagree, >applying the mainline change should work equally well, so decide >for yourself. Thanks Arnd, I took the series as is. We really need to discuss how -stable deals with removed code upstream. For some cases, we should probably follow suit and remove it from -stable as well (I'm mostly thinking dodgy code with potential security issues). -- Thanks, Sasha _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel