From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F640C43387 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 15:12:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28DDB21873 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 15:12:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="fjR0L9R9"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="QPjz+9iG" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 28DDB21873 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=UW60EorlsB91gMPV+nzHcBLQcADbg37lceixZPxBUVg=; b=fjR0L9R9BSoFdi AEOK6AaljCC1lJ/35kRKPPWQ3ZKK9ooyPPLVA0fSSiE69EbQF9kOns8Hv0PqH1mAvvkO3bVnlss1n PApB1qcFe9r+61YIMJB4rSeQseOEdurvioodYztNld0kjhm6yKqvLJ/E3ywbJ5qUey6KLpN6zV50o ZvmLT23+lFbZk0e0ot6g6vdElgE3q7xL4D0A+jGGbaSal4MyxgQxwU9+Onp4DLJ4u66nICVy6xojv 5S8b+onG5ILMMaMnHuupeDIRx2JTKAJ12Kw3hSFRc1E4FqZVGnU8ZX28dWk1fPZYTJ/nknv2mOlIL HnPQhjWg//eYnrrbJVaw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gZH38-0006ls-D9; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 15:12:46 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gZH35-0006lA-Jk for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 15:12:44 +0000 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1EC121871; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 15:12:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1545145952; bh=8Q4eZ8594DtSKWB2e+2mmCyVzsNilZD31iQ4WDodpxc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=QPjz+9iGGOhxNQdjSkLMzgPocoibi5BIHhy1Z84bN4AJcyiNC4g2lJz3+xC42LuKF zFtR0FA8SbiZsfzY1cRh5uWT9kDVc9GH0qT6ZJ0x1EuF1ESSnicdnIhghWfVWPsii1 uEW82Bug+Q8YAmH60lGSk41VmrGb5Tk6x2/PhSnM= Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 16:12:30 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] v4.19-stable randconfig fixes Message-ID: <20181218151230.GA30844@kroah.com> References: <20181214221023.3878670-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20181218002028.GX2746@sasha-vm> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181218002028.GX2746@sasha-vm> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1 (2018-12-01) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20181218_071243_683442_F429A652 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.97 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, Peter Zijlstra , David Brown , Srinivas Kandagatla , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, "James E.J. Bottomley" , Daniel Drake , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Jens Frederich , openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org, Ingo Molnar , Andy Gross , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Lubomir Rintel , dou_liyang@163.com, Rob Herring , bp@alien8.de, Vincent Guittot , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "Martin K. Petersen" , Andrew Jeffery , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Rob Clark , freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 07:20:28PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 11:10:05PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > I did some randconfig testing on linux-4.19 arm/arm64/x86. So far I needed > > 27 patches, most of which are also still needed in mainline Linux. I > > had submitted some before, and others were not submitted previously > > for some reason. I'll try to get those fixed in mainline and then > > make sure we get them into 4.19 as well. > > > > This series for now contains four patches that did make it into mainline: > > > > 2e6ae11dd0d1 ("slimbus: ngd: mark PM functions as __maybe_unused") > > 33f49571d750 ("staging: olpc_dcon: add a missing dependency") > > 0eeec01488da ("scsi: raid_attrs: fix unused variable warning") > > 11d4afd4ff66 ("sched/pelt: Fix warning and clean up IRQ PELT config") > > > > Feel free to either cherry-pick those from mainline or apply the > > patch from this series, whichever works best for you. > > > > The other three patches are for warnings in code that got removed in > > mainline kernels: > > > > 3e9efc3299dd ("i2c: aspeed: Handle master/slave combined irq events properly") > > 972910948fb6 ("ARM: dts: qcom: Remove Arrow SD600 eval board") > > effec874792f ("drm/msm/dpu: Remove dpu_dbg") > > > > My feeling was that it's safer to just address the warning by fixing > > the code correctly in each of these cases, but if you disagree, > > applying the mainline change should work equally well, so decide > > for yourself. > > Thanks Arnd, I took the series as is. > > We really need to discuss how -stable deals with removed code upstream. > For some cases, we should probably follow suit and remove it from > -stable as well (I'm mostly thinking dodgy code with potential security > issues). It would be nice to do that at times (like lustre and ipx), but it's good to keep that code around as maybe someone is using it? I don't know, it's a tough call... thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel