From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8740C282C4 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 15:24:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77B1D20863 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 15:24:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="eTOKVMex" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 77B1D20863 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Hz2NceW+MhLi1UaFQK4QbssNJDcUPGL3aHMAI7JllZs=; b=eTOKVMexAmACut +EwkvycRZnwvIar2u3OOPgl66iQqylyUw9C0snp4bZhbXu0HvYZ4AkTMeeHKIwGKpFIZxXZMyqIVp qPgezjMFvg+hEOD3PhAe5rv6DL+D3Xkp/YrJFGACza+1SEaqXkbjhZXgjp7cuKb7ADgCZREwhFGB4 5wgprH2zFVuYg2mZZyTetxYkPdBj2RAVkmqSRC3pIlne6t9+f4kUJWkX3lt3XH+PoLyLZBbpjWQu+ QofTVxTtr44yupfcDuxik3hRMHK+Md2IX9Ix6JudKYapFx466Uz80wU9U9pLpvYMaon3t6ToP0Ykl XJcX+YElmTBWAnSNPeVA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gtZvb-0003fY-Gc; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 15:24:55 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gtZvY-0003ec-1Y for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 15:24:53 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C5580D; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 07:24:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from fuggles.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B6B13F557; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 07:24:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 15:24:44 +0000 From: Will Deacon To: Mark Rutland Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] arm64: SMCCC conduit cleanup Message-ID: <20190212152444.GE6302@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20180503170330.5591-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180503170330.5591-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1+86 (6f28e57d73f2) () X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190212_072452_387590_8F93E2F9 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.33 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 06:03:26PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > Currently, the cpu errata code goes digging into PSCI internals to > discover the SMCCC conduit, using the (arguably misnamed) PSCI_CONDUIT_* > definitions. This lack of abstraction is somewhat unfortunate. > > Further, the SDEI code has an almost identical set of CONDUIT_* > definitions, and the duplication is rather unfortunate. > > Let's unify things behind a common set of SMCCC_CONDUIT_* definitions, > and expose the SMCCCv1.1 conduit via a new helper that hides the PSCI > driver internals. I just noticed that this didn't get merged, for some reason. I acked it at the time, so what's left to do? Will _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel