From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp,
linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
openrisc@lists.librecores.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] locking/rwsem: Rwsem rearchitecture part 0
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 18:40:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190215184056.GC15084@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190214103715.GI32494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 11:37:15AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 05:00:14PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
> > v4:
> > - Remove rwsem-spinlock.c and make all archs use rwsem-xadd.c.
> >
> > v3:
> > - Optimize __down_read_trylock() for the uncontended case as suggested
> > by Linus.
> >
> > v2:
> > - Add patch 2 to optimize __down_read_trylock() as suggested by PeterZ.
> > - Update performance test data in patch 1.
> >
> > The goal of this patchset is to remove the architecture specific files
> > for rwsem-xadd to make it easer to add enhancements in the later rwsem
> > patches. It also removes the legacy rwsem-spinlock.c file and make all
> > the architectures use one single implementation of rwsem - rwsem-xadd.c.
> >
> > Waiman Long (3):
> > locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files
> > locking/rwsem: Remove rwsem-spinlock.c & use rwsem-xadd.c for all
> > archs
> > locking/rwsem: Optimize down_read_trylock()
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
>
> with the caveat that I'm happy to exchange patch 3 back to my earlier
> suggestion in case Will expesses concerns wrt the ARM64 performance of
> Linus' suggestion.
Right, the current proposal doesn't work well for us, unfortunately. Which
was your earlier suggestion?
Will
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-15 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-13 22:00 [PATCH v4 0/3] locking/rwsem: Rwsem rearchitecture part 0 Waiman Long
2019-02-13 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] locking/rwsem: Remove arch specific rwsem files Waiman Long
2019-02-20 14:47 ` Will Deacon
2019-02-13 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] locking/rwsem: Remove rwsem-spinlock.c & use rwsem-xadd.c for all archs Waiman Long
2019-02-14 10:54 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-02-14 11:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-20 14:47 ` Will Deacon
2019-02-13 22:00 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] locking/rwsem: Optimize down_read_trylock() Waiman Long
2019-02-21 14:14 ` Will Deacon
2019-02-22 3:28 ` Waiman Long
2019-02-14 10:37 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] locking/rwsem: Rwsem rearchitecture part 0 Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-14 22:05 ` Waiman Long
2019-02-15 18:40 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2019-02-15 18:58 ` Waiman Long
2019-02-18 14:58 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190215184056.GC15084@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org \
--cc=linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org \
--cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).