From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Tom Murphy <tmurphy@arista.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 17/24] iommu/dma: Cleanup variable naming in iommu_dma_alloc
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 09:29:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190520072948.11412-18-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190520072948.11412-1-hch@lst.de>
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Most importantly clear up the size / iosize confusion. Also rename addr
to cpu_addr to match the surrounding code and make the intention a little
more clear.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
[hch: split from a larger patch]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
index f0cd35fd11dd..4e27a29f4458 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
@@ -977,64 +977,63 @@ static void *iommu_dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
{
bool coherent = dev_is_dma_coherent(dev);
int ioprot = dma_info_to_prot(DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, coherent, attrs);
- size_t iosize = size;
+ size_t alloc_size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
struct page *page = NULL;
- void *addr;
+ void *cpu_addr;
- size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
gfp |= __GFP_ZERO;
if (gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp) &&
!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS))
- return iommu_dma_alloc_remap(dev, iosize, handle, gfp, attrs);
+ return iommu_dma_alloc_remap(dev, size, handle, gfp, attrs);
if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp) && !coherent) {
- addr = dma_alloc_from_pool(size, &page, gfp);
- if (!addr)
+ cpu_addr = dma_alloc_from_pool(alloc_size, &page, gfp);
+ if (!cpu_addr)
return NULL;
- *handle = __iommu_dma_map(dev, page_to_phys(page), iosize,
+ *handle = __iommu_dma_map(dev, page_to_phys(page), size,
ioprot);
if (*handle == DMA_MAPPING_ERROR) {
- dma_free_from_pool(addr, size);
+ dma_free_from_pool(cpu_addr, alloc_size);
return NULL;
}
- return addr;
+ return cpu_addr;
}
if (gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp))
- page = dma_alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size >> PAGE_SHIFT,
- get_order(size),
+ page = dma_alloc_from_contiguous(dev, alloc_size >> PAGE_SHIFT,
+ get_order(alloc_size),
gfp & __GFP_NOWARN);
if (!page)
- page = alloc_pages(gfp, get_order(size));
+ page = alloc_pages(gfp, get_order(alloc_size));
if (!page)
return NULL;
- *handle = __iommu_dma_map(dev, page_to_phys(page), iosize, ioprot);
+ *handle = __iommu_dma_map(dev, page_to_phys(page), size, ioprot);
if (*handle == DMA_MAPPING_ERROR)
goto out_free_pages;
if (!coherent || PageHighMem(page)) {
pgprot_t prot = arch_dma_mmap_pgprot(dev, PAGE_KERNEL, attrs);
- addr = dma_common_contiguous_remap(page, size, VM_USERMAP, prot,
- __builtin_return_address(0));
- if (!addr)
+ cpu_addr = dma_common_contiguous_remap(page, alloc_size,
+ VM_USERMAP, prot, __builtin_return_address(0));
+ if (!cpu_addr)
goto out_unmap;
if (!coherent)
- arch_dma_prep_coherent(page, iosize);
+ arch_dma_prep_coherent(page, size);
} else {
- addr = page_address(page);
+ cpu_addr = page_address(page);
}
- memset(addr, 0, size);
- return addr;
+ memset(cpu_addr, 0, alloc_size);
+ return cpu_addr;
out_unmap:
- __iommu_dma_unmap(dev, *handle, iosize);
+ __iommu_dma_unmap(dev, *handle, size);
out_free_pages:
- if (!dma_release_from_contiguous(dev, page, size >> PAGE_SHIFT))
- __free_pages(page, get_order(size));
+ if (!dma_release_from_contiguous(dev, page, alloc_size >> PAGE_SHIFT))
+ __free_pages(page, get_order(alloc_size));
return NULL;
}
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-20 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-20 7:29 implement generic dma_map_ops for IOMMUs v5 Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-20 7:29 ` [PATCH 01/24] arm64/iommu: handle non-remapped addresses in ->mmap and ->get_sgtable Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-22 12:54 ` Will Deacon
2019-05-20 7:29 ` [PATCH 02/24] iommu/dma: Cleanup dma-iommu.h Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-20 7:29 ` [PATCH 03/24] iommu/dma: Remove the flush_page callback Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-20 7:29 ` [PATCH 04/24] iommu/dma: Use for_each_sg in iommu_dma_alloc Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-20 7:29 ` [PATCH 05/24] iommu/dma: move the arm64 wrappers to common code Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-20 7:29 ` [PATCH 06/24] iommu/dma: Move __iommu_dma_map Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-20 7:29 ` [PATCH 07/24] iommu/dma: Move domain lookup into __iommu_dma_{map, unmap} Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-22 13:34 ` Robin Murphy
2019-05-22 15:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-29 12:12 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2019-07-29 13:13 ` Robin Murphy
2019-05-20 7:29 ` [PATCH 08/24] iommu/dma: Squash __iommu_dma_{map,unmap}_page helpers Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-20 7:29 ` [PATCH 09/24] iommu/dma: Factor out remapped pages lookup Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-20 7:29 ` [PATCH 10/24] iommu/dma: Refactor the page array remapping allocator Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-20 7:29 ` [PATCH 11/24] iommu/dma: Remove __iommu_dma_free Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-20 7:29 ` [PATCH 12/24] iommu/dma: Refactor iommu_dma_free Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-20 7:29 ` [PATCH 13/24] iommu/dma: Refactor iommu_dma_alloc Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-20 7:29 ` [PATCH 14/24] iommu/dma: Don't remap CMA unnecessarily Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-20 7:29 ` [PATCH 15/24] iommu/dma: Merge the CMA and alloc_pages allocation paths Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-20 7:29 ` [PATCH 16/24] iommu/dma: Split iommu_dma_free Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-20 7:29 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-05-20 7:29 ` [PATCH 18/24] iommu/dma: Refactor iommu_dma_alloc, part 2 Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-20 7:29 ` [PATCH 19/24] iommu/dma: Refactor iommu_dma_get_sgtable Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-20 7:29 ` [PATCH 20/24] iommu/dma: Refactor iommu_dma_mmap Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-22 17:11 ` Robin Murphy
2019-05-20 7:29 ` [PATCH 21/24] iommu/dma: Don't depend on CONFIG_DMA_DIRECT_REMAP Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-20 7:29 ` [PATCH 22/24] iommu/dma: Switch copyright boilerplace to SPDX Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-20 7:29 ` [PATCH 23/24] arm64: switch copyright boilerplace to SPDX in dma-mapping.c Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-20 7:29 ` [PATCH 24/24] arm64: trim includes " Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-27 15:37 ` implement generic dma_map_ops for IOMMUs v5 Joerg Roedel
2019-05-27 15:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-27 15:45 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190520072948.11412-18-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=tmurphy@arista.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).