linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] arm64: wire up VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 11:04:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190528100413.GA20809@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190523102256.29168-1-ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:22:52AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Wire up the code introduced in v5.2 to manage the permissions
> of executable vmalloc regions (and their linear aliases) more
> strictly.
> 
> One of the things that came up in the internal discussion is
> whether non-x86 architectures have any benefit at all from the
> lazy vunmap feature, and whether it would perhaps be better to
> implement eager vunmap instead.
> 
> Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
> Cc: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> 
> Ard Biesheuvel (4):
>   arm64: module: create module allocations without exec permissions
>   arm64/mm: wire up CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SET_DIRECT_MAP
>   arm64/kprobes: set VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS on kprobe instruction pages
>   arm64: bpf: do not allocate executable memory
> 
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig                  |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/cacheflush.h |  3 ++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/module.c          |  4 +-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c  |  4 +-
>  arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c            | 48 ++++++++++++++++----
>  arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c       |  2 +-
>  mm/vmalloc.c                        | 11 -----
>  7 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

Thanks, this all looks good to me. I can get pick this up for 5.2 if
Rick's fixes [1] land soon enough.

Cheers,

Will

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190527211058.2729-1-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com/T/#u

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-28 10:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-23 10:22 [PATCH 0/4] arm64: wire up VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS Ard Biesheuvel
2019-05-23 10:22 ` [PATCH 1/4] arm64: module: create module allocations without exec permissions Ard Biesheuvel
2019-05-28  5:35   ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-05-28  6:24     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-05-23 10:22 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm64/mm: wire up CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SET_DIRECT_MAP Ard Biesheuvel
2019-05-28  8:10   ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-05-28  8:20     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-05-28  8:41       ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-05-28  8:58         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-05-23 10:22 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm64/kprobes: set VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS on kprobe instruction pages Ard Biesheuvel
2019-05-28  8:20   ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-05-28  8:23     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-05-23 10:22 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm64: bpf: do not allocate executable memory Ard Biesheuvel
2019-05-28 10:04 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2019-05-28 10:29   ` [PATCH 0/4] arm64: wire up VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS Ard Biesheuvel
2019-06-24 11:16   ` Will Deacon
2019-06-24 11:22     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-06-24 14:29       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-06-24 17:14         ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-24 17:15           ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190528100413.GA20809@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=namit@vmware.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).