From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D989C31E51 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 13:40:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71B3820823 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 13:40:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="WjIPpl+o" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 71B3820823 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Jx5mtBFcShBQRvbvEvaJL89n939NrTofVwDvLwFL2V8=; b=WjIPpl+oC4Fmw+ XFPBYi+O5Whqw1YvOg1ihMPqLYJSGl2wmfQA1Vp/xXmwQBQdt11ZfyVvAgx99v8JYmYS5aMRdEvYq QR1uhqMMtHIbEpg+VTb5pNkUo3iI8xGR5SPmCg21nQh0FM9PkiZ3A2XBJwcPop8xOudATLSCxx/7u caPAgfBrgWFcJ9nSuszuU8HRnyB7gfBG7NEfssoZrqdESPHfIR4YMizsSzwZYacgk1EiF4I9LQUjc oZf8WkMI2nD2oYOphs+jTqeGFij3xhsX/PsKHq0BOs54oAE+Er1JPgfjGiSJYXp5tlmNH5jqYizWu xYie9wX7bnppn9PHdgVA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hdELn-0002OS-Ix; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 13:40:39 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hdELh-0002NG-LS for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 13:40:35 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46682B; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 06:40:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e103592.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 726B63F718; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 06:40:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:40:29 +0100 From: Dave Martin To: Anisse Astier Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64/sve: should not depend on Message-ID: <20190618134029.GE2790@e103592.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20190613163801.21949-1-aastier@freebox.fr> <20190614164600.36966-1-aastier@freebox.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190614164600.36966-1-aastier@freebox.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190618_064033_768211_307C1FFE X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.96 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , Rich Felker , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon , "Dmitry V . Levin" , Ricardo Salveti , Kristina Martsenko , Richard Henderson , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 06:46:00PM +0200, Anisse Astier wrote: > Otherwise this will create userspace build issues for any program > (strace, qemu) that includes both (with musl libc) and > (which then includes ), like this: > > error: redefinition of 'struct prctl_mm_map' > struct prctl_mm_map { > > See https://github.com/foundriesio/meta-lmp/commit/6d4a106e191b5d79c41b9ac78fd321316d3013c0 > for a public example of people working around this issue. > > Copying the defines is a bit imperfect here, but better than creating a > whole other header for just two defines that would never change, as part > of the kernel ABI. > > Fixes: 43d4da2c45b2 ("arm64/sve: ptrace and ELF coredump support") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Anisse Astier > --- > Changes since v1: > - made a bit more explicit that we copied defined symbols, in commit > and code. > - Use Fixes: tag in commit message > > Thanks to Dave Martin and Will Deacon for the review. > > --- > arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h | 8 +++----- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h > index d78623acb649..438759e7e8a7 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h > @@ -65,8 +65,6 @@ > > #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ > > -#include > - > /* > * User structures for general purpose, floating point and debug registers. > */ > @@ -113,10 +111,10 @@ struct user_sve_header { > > /* > * Common SVE_PT_* flags: > - * These must be kept in sync with prctl interface in > + * These must be kept in sync with prctl interface in > */ > -#define SVE_PT_VL_INHERIT (PR_SVE_VL_INHERIT >> 16) > -#define SVE_PT_VL_ONEXEC (PR_SVE_SET_VL_ONEXEC >> 16) > +#define SVE_PT_VL_INHERIT ((1 << 17) /* PR_SVE_VL_INHERIT */ >> 16) > +#define SVE_PT_VL_ONEXEC ((1 << 18) /* PR_SVE_SET_VL_ONEXEC */ >> 16) FWIW, Acked-by: Dave Martin Ideally we would create a common that arm64 could specialise as appropriate, but since x86 already has a similar header shadowing this, it may be more trouble than it's worth to generalise it. Cheers ---Dave _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel