From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A414BC4646C for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 15:33:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C8C320673 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 15:33:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="h5VWrH7G" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7C8C320673 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=dPPHTHA297i4CdHPZO0B6T0EZfwZXhDIipQMiXFMhyg=; b=h5VWrH7G/JnBg3 tbcQpKEdGHLv4Bo8qb7arpK/2TqGb8LmSMgQeBBEwSxcGi/TlThBx1gTRFpQKiY/vmhfl+15rpGt6 8e4O6is/yMK5HGusM3+w4AJ5ea3ZvUj5Lyt9PY4SfIk+O6P78RXVx6JmLYyJOUxMnmxDFzIAuyn0c TyyrdvS2/MmdvXfGkav1ZthzH3pCtsr9rHQjQ4IS5NlZ56VygBWTAAm3Bw4edHPFidySkTTPbtnqa nOJwdKiO+5mvDC6XBxkPEACLC2oL+GlSCeJtejin68+YmJqolPFiHo4O9zn/4lXiwd43AhbKWm+Eo 3TEUXHI7A8qI7B9Ak9Aw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hfQye-0006JC-6K; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 15:33:52 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hfQya-0006Ht-IG; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 15:33:50 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873E52B; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 08:33:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e107155-lin (e107155-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.42]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 50AD03F71E; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 08:33:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:33:38 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/7] arm: Use common cpu_topology structure and functions. Message-ID: <20190624153338.GA3762@e107155-lin> References: <20190617185920.29581-1-atish.patra@wdc.com> <20190617185920.29581-5-atish.patra@wdc.com> <20190619121057.GE1360@e107155-lin> <20190624150658.GA1623@e107155-lin> <20190624153033.3jpdd7vsekdiltmb@shell.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190624153033.3jpdd7vsekdiltmb@shell.armlinux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190624_083348_656125_AC08A889 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 23.71 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Peter Zijlstra \(Intel\)" , Catalin Marinas , Linus Walleij , Palmer Dabbelt , Will Deacon , Richard Fontana , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Morten Rasmussen , Anup Patel , Ingo Molnar , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Albert Ou , Rob Herring , Paul Walmsley , Jonathan Cameron , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Atish Patra , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Otto Sabart , Sudeep Holla , "David S. Miller" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 04:30:33PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 04:06:58PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 01:10:57PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > Hi Russell, > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 11:59:17AM -0700, Atish Patra wrote: > > > > Currently, ARM32 and ARM64 uses different data structures to represent > > > > their cpu topologies. Since, we are moving the ARM64 topology to common > > > > code to be used by other architectures, we can reuse that for ARM32 as > > > > well. > > > > > > > > Take this opprtunity to remove the redundant functions from ARM32 and > > > > reuse the common code instead. > > > > > > > > To: Russell King > > > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra > > > > Tested-by: Sudeep Holla (on TC2) > > > > Reviewed-by : Sudeep Holla > > > > > > > > --- > > > > Hi Russell, > > > > Can we get a ACK for this patch ? We are hoping that the entire > > > > series can be merged at one go. > > > > > > It would be nice to get this in for v5.3 as it's almost there. > > > Are you fine with these changes ? > > > > > > > Do you have any objections with this patch ? We plan to merge through > > RISC-V tree, please let us know. It has been acked-by all the other > > maintainers. > > I have no interest in the CPU topology code; as far as I know I have > no systems that are able to exercise this code in any way. Therefore, > I don't know this code, I have no way to test it, and so it is not > appropriate for me to ack patches for it. > I completely understand that and we can take care of testing. As along as you don't have objections to this, that should be fine I believe. -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel