On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 02:36:30PM +0200, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 2:32 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Olof,
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 04:41:19AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 10:08:08AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Please pull the following changes for the next release.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > > Maxime
> > > >
> > > > The following changes since commit a188339ca5a396acc588e5851ed7e19f66b0ebd9:
> > > >
> > > >   Linux 5.2-rc1 (2019-05-19 15:47:09 -0700)
> > > >
> > > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > > >
> > > >   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sunxi/linux.git refs/tags/sunxi-dt-for-5.3-201906210807
> > >
> > > You know, there's a timestamp in the tag too, no need to encode it in the name.
> >
> > Yeah, I've switched to some tooling to send them instead of doing them
> > manually, and having a timestamp was the easiest solution to avoid a
> > collision, but I guess having it down to the minute was a bit
> > overkill. Do you have any preference on this?
>
> Main thing for me is that I can't tell from time timestamps if it's a
> respin/new version, or a re-stamp, i.e. if it's something I should
> care about or not.
>
> I.e. it doesn't carry any useful signal for the consuming side and is
> mostly noise.

Ok, so you'd prefer something like <tag>, <tag>-2 if there's multiple,
subsequent, PR, and <tag>, <tag>-again if the latter replaces the former?

Maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com