linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, liwei391@huawei.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	acme@kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	mingo@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, jolsa@redhat.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] arm: perf: Remove Remove PMU locking
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 16:10:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190708151045.GF33099@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1562596377-33196-5-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com>

On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 03:32:52PM +0100, Julien Thierry wrote:
> Since the PMU interrupt saves and restores the value of the selector
> register, there is no need to serialize register accesses against the
> interrupt contexts.
> 
> For operations that can be called with interrupts enabled, preemption
> still needs to be disabled to ensure the programming of the PMU is
> done on the expected CPU and not migrated mid-programming.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
> ---
>  arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c | 56 +++--------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

>  static void armv7pmu_start(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
>  {
> -	unsigned long flags;
> -	struct pmu_hw_events *events = this_cpu_ptr(cpu_pmu->hw_events);
> -
> -	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
> +	preempt_disable();
>  	/* Enable all counters */
>  	armv7_pmnc_write(armv7_pmnc_read() | ARMV7_PMNC_E);
> -	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
> +	preempt_enable();
>  }
> 
>  static void armv7pmu_stop(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
>  {
> -	unsigned long flags;
> -	struct pmu_hw_events *events = this_cpu_ptr(cpu_pmu->hw_events);
> -
> -	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
> +	preempt_disable();
>  	/* Disable all counters */
>  	armv7_pmnc_write(armv7_pmnc_read() & ~ARMV7_PMNC_E);
> -	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
> +	preempt_enable();
>  }

As with the arm64 patch, I suspect/hope it's not necessary to disable
preemption here.

Thanks,
Mark.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-08 15:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-08 14:32 [PATCH v3 0/9] arm_pmu: Use NMI for perf interrupt Julien Thierry
2019-07-08 14:32 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] arm64: perf: avoid PMXEV* indirection Julien Thierry
2019-07-08 15:03   ` Mark Rutland
2019-07-10 10:57   ` Steven Price
2019-07-10 11:01     ` Julien Thierry
2019-07-16 10:33       ` Shijith Thotton
2019-07-16 10:54         ` Julien Thierry
2019-07-17  4:45           ` Shijith Thotton
2019-07-08 14:32 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] arm64: perf: Remove PMU locking Julien Thierry
2019-07-08 15:03   ` Mark Rutland
2019-07-08 15:34     ` Julien Thierry
2019-07-09 11:22       ` Mark Rutland
2019-07-08 14:32 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] arm: perf: save/resore pmsel Julien Thierry
2019-07-08 15:06   ` Mark Rutland
2019-07-08 15:40     ` Julien Thierry
2019-07-08 14:32 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] arm: perf: Remove Remove PMU locking Julien Thierry
2019-07-08 15:10   ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2019-07-08 14:32 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] perf/arm_pmu: Move PMU lock to ARMv6 events Julien Thierry
2019-07-08 15:19   ` Mark Rutland
2019-07-08 15:50     ` Julien Thierry
2019-07-08 14:32 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] arm64: perf: Do not call irq_work_run in NMI context Julien Thierry
2019-07-08 15:29   ` Mark Rutland
2019-07-08 16:00     ` Julien Thierry
2019-07-08 14:32 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] arm/arm64: kvm: pmu: Make overflow handler NMI safe Julien Thierry
2019-07-08 15:30   ` Mark Rutland
2019-07-11 12:38   ` Zenghui Yu
2019-07-08 14:32 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] arm_pmu: Introduce pmu_irq_ops Julien Thierry
2019-07-08 14:32 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] arm_pmu: Use NMIs for PMU Julien Thierry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190708151045.GF33099@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=liwei391@huawei.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).