From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B11C433FF for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 10:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EB892087C for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 10:50:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="FNqQ42jQ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3EB892087C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Fk03WToepdTpABruT9baH+0un9Wjc/w1mazh/7RDx+Y=; b=FNqQ42jQM7kN3Z Rg5HhsVZBRU50cvhZh1tTOl8rikQUoqVYZLM4dug+KeWolaNxpEeV095pFv9TlNZjYkpH3uXas1QZ wyzyPhRJGyK2S7ZhkJuuGPq0225+2VYL/VG+2AtIdU4xaRrWML4luLpi9JNG4XgjaB/RJOberXeMs xi9+uUvjSDFLXpBfYK8+bh3b10uHqrdsaSeybIaFY1g5K++tEUkZ4Wgl/FvFOrMOE5D9OZ0NUE1e5 QqYCImrydGBGavjgkUxt4Mfqp6oFD70ZFVgVTwJiOpHnAEbgKq59zNpvnyUu9TO3hQnpW2MCX7mF2 mjFMOOdXRr9JZCx4Bl1g==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1htV96-0001Fl-Qi; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 10:50:48 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1htV94-0001FO-18 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 10:50:47 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CBE3344; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 03:50:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arrakis.emea.arm.com (arrakis.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.78]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9FF973F71F; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 03:50:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 11:50:38 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Dave Hansen Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 02/15] arm64: Introduce prctl() options to control the tagged user addresses ABI Message-ID: <20190802105038.GC4175@arrakis.emea.arm.com> References: <1c05651c53f90d07e98ee4973c2786ccf315db12.1563904656.git.andreyknvl@google.com> <7a34470c-73f0-26ac-e63d-161191d4b1e4@intel.com> <2b274c6f-6023-8eb8-5a86-507e6000e13d@arm.com> <88c59d1e-eda9-fcfe-5ee3-64a331f34313@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <88c59d1e-eda9-fcfe-5ee3-64a331f34313@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190802_035046_111650_AA78CF04 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.13 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Szabolcs Nagy , Will Deacon , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Khalid Aziz , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Felix Kuehling , Vincenzo Frascino , Jacob Bramley , Leon Romanovsky , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Christoph Hellwig , Jason Gunthorpe , Dmitry Vyukov , Ramana Radhakrishnan , Dave Martin , Evgeniy Stepanov , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook , Ruben Ayrapetyan , Andrey Konovalov , Kevin Brodsky , Alex Williamson , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Kostya Serebryany , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Yishai Hadas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Wiklander , Lee Smith , Alexander Deucher , Andrew Morton , enh , Robin Murphy , Christian Koenig , Luc Van Oostenryck Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 09:45:05AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 8/1/19 5:38 AM, Kevin Brodsky wrote: > > This patch series only changes what is allowed or not at the syscall > > interface. It does not change the address space size. On arm64, TBI (Top > > Byte Ignore) has always been enabled for userspace, so it has never been > > possible to use the upper 8 bits of user pointers for addressing. > > Oh, so does the address space that's available already chop that out? Yes. Currently the hardware only supports 52-bit virtual addresses. It could be expanded (though it needs a 5th page table level) to 56-bit VA but it's not currently on our (hardware) plans. Beyond 56-bit, it cannot be done without breaking the software expectations (and hopefully I'll retire before we need this ;)). > > If other architectures were to support a similar functionality, then I > > agree that a common and more generic interface (if needed) would be > > helpful, but as it stands this is an arm64-specific prctl, and on arm64 > > the address tag is defined by the architecture as bits [63:56]. > > It should then be an arch_prctl(), no? I guess you just want renaming SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL() to arch_prctl_tagged_addr_ctrl_set()? (similarly for 'get') -- Catalin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel