From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/11] kselftest: arm64: adds first test and common utils
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 13:32:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190809123233.GM10425@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4a73fcdf-911e-b44a-ce6b-f9bcde34eec8@arm.com>
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 01:20:45PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On 8/9/19 12:16 PM, Dave Martin wrote:
> >On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 11:54:06AM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> >>Hi
> >>
> >>On 8/2/19 6:02 PM, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> >>>Added some arm64/signal specific boilerplate and utility code to help
> >>>further testcase development.
> >>>
> >>>A simple testcase and related helpers are also introduced in this commit:
> >>>mangle_pstate_invalid_compat_toggle is a simple mangle testcase which
> >>>messes with the ucontext_t from within the sig_handler, trying to toggle
> >>>PSTATE state bits to switch the system between 32bit/64bit execution state.
> >>>Expects SIGSEGV on test PASS.
> >>>
> >>>Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
> >>>---
[...]
> >>diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.c
> >>index 31788a1d33a4..c0f3cd1b560a 100644
> >>--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.c
> >>+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.c
> >>@@ -23,21 +23,25 @@ extern struct tdescr *current;
> >> static int sig_copyctx = SIGTRAP;
> >> static char *feats_store[FMAX_END] = {
> >>- "SSBS",
> >>- "PAN",
> >>- "UAO",
> >>+ " SSBS ",
> >>+ " PAN ",
> >>+ " UAO ",
> >> };
> >> #define MAX_FEATS_SZ 128
> >>+static char feats_string[MAX_FEATS_SZ];
> >>+
> >> static inline char *feats_to_string(unsigned long feats)
> >> {
> >>- static char feats_string[MAX_FEATS_SZ];
> >>+ for (int i = 0; i < FMAX_END; i++) {
> >>+ size_t tlen = 0;
> >>- for (int i = 0; i < FMAX_END && feats_store[i][0]; i++) {
> >>- if (feats & 1UL << i)
> >>- snprintf(feats_string, MAX_FEATS_SZ - 1, "%s %s ",
> >>- feats_string, feats_store[i]);
> >>+ if (feats & 1UL << i) {
> >>+ strncat(feats_string, feats_store[i],
> >
> >Should this be feats_string + tlen?
> >
>
> strncat appends to the end of a NULL terminated string overwriting the NULL itself and
> appending its own NULL (as long as dest and src do not overlap and fits the max size param),
> so it must be fed the start of the dest string to which we are appending
>
> >>+ MAX_FEATS_SZ - 1 - tlen);
I see. Yes, you're right -- I was confusing strncat() with strncpy().
> >An assert(tlen <= MAX_FEATS_SZ - 1) is probably a good idea here,
> >in case more features are added to feats_store[] someday.
> >
>
> Yes in fact...if not it would be simply truncated silently
I think MAX_FEATS - 1 - tlen would overflow. tlen is a size_t, so the
result would might be a giant unsigned number in this case, leading to a
potential buffer overrun in strncat().
>
> >>+ tlen += strlen(feats_store[i]);
> >>+ }
> >
> >Don't we need to initialise tlen outside the loop? Otherwise we just
> >zero it again after the +=.
>
> ..and that's a bug :<
OK
> >
> >> }
> >> return feats_string;
> >>@@ -190,7 +194,7 @@ static void default_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *si, void *uc)
> >> /* it's a bug in the test code when this assert fail */
> >> assert(!current->sig_trig || current->triggered);
> >> fprintf(stderr,
> >>- "SIG_OK -- SP:%p si_addr@:0x%p si_code:%d token@:0x%p offset:%ld\n",
> >>+ "SIG_OK -- SP:%llX si_addr@:0x%p si_code:%d token@:0x%p offset:%ld\n",
> >
> >For consistency, can we have a "0x" prefix?
> >
> >I think %p usually generates a "0x" prefix by itself, so 0x%p might give
> >a double prefix.
> >
>
> Yes you are right.
>
> Moreover I'm in doubt what to do generally with all these stderr
> output, because I optionally discard to null testing standalone, but
> this is not what the KSFT framework runner script does, so
> arm64/signal tests end up being overly verbose when run from the
> framework (even if tests use anyway the KSFT exit codes conventions
> so all the results are correctly reported); but I suppose I'll
> receive a clear indication on this matter from the maintainers at the
> end...
Sure, keep the prints for now. If they're potentially useful we can
always find a way to make them optional.
Cheers
---Dave
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-09 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-02 17:02 [PATCH v3 00/11] Add arm64/signal initial kselftest support Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] kselftest: arm64: introduce new boilerplate code Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:23 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-27 12:14 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] kselftest: arm64: adds first test and common utils Cristian Marussi
2019-08-06 15:50 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-07 15:42 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-09 10:54 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-09 11:16 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-09 12:20 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-09 12:32 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2019-08-12 12:43 ` Amit Kachhap
2019-08-13 13:22 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-14 10:22 ` Amit Kachhap
2019-08-27 14:24 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:24 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-28 17:34 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-03 15:34 ` Dave Martin
2019-09-03 16:08 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] kselftest: arm64: mangle_pstate_invalid_daif_bits Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:24 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-29 10:19 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] kselftest: arm64: mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:24 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-29 11:50 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] kselftest: arm64: mangle_pstate_ssbs_regs Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:25 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-29 15:35 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_bad_magic Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:25 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 14:29 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-04 10:05 ` Dave Martin
2019-09-04 10:37 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-04 10:47 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_bad_size_for_magic0 Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:25 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 14:49 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_missing_fpsimd Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:26 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 14:55 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:26 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 15:11 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_bad_size Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:26 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 15:21 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:03 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_misaligned_sp Cristian Marussi
2019-08-07 16:04 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:28 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 15:22 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:27 ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 16:33 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:22 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] Add arm64/signal initial kselftest support Dave Martin
2019-08-30 16:40 ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-02 10:53 ` Dave Martin
2019-09-02 11:30 ` Cristian Marussi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190809123233.GM10425@arm.com \
--to=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).