From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A9AC31E40 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 18:37:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82A0B2166E for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 18:37:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="fssHqSEs"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="FI1vTkLp" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 82A0B2166E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=armlinux.org.uk Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=W6fyfb01qXfCCEbOCKuY7yrpaDniOcIpqTdGME402lQ=; b=fssHqSEsOlrWkZ RVYRtYWCjsoiRxF/OYK++JdFpCixS4zTqtq4DTDeyWmxBXTvLgRZCiGJfg6m2xLa8I65TTADQQaP6 9gtNLeZeLuUh+qHsATXn7N7nufKDfJJvCLo53zqVTOwBJ2eenRQHr6rzD5Z6tAPlsNqjSeUDeBpKz ULQIuxoI34l6OYGx1Jr0+5N6PRgpuhQ8Q1ovPjdAzHOKm7Y06prfvclHQdilEdV8SxsavpPps4E/M JOy9vxPMIOykuMgZZO7FQqiTzLP6HEoRXpEwbeI1QEvnk08+6Ns1X5171UwSUs49tdwYSxCmM01Ql 9H8sq70kGxbhKfms5k6w==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hw9lY-0000vx-KR; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 18:37:28 +0000 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([2001:4d48:ad52:3201:214:fdff:fe10:1be6]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hw9lV-0000uX-Ml for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 18:37:27 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=IGx1tU/8oZZB3pB47GcI0li+Dcw0am8UumHeTJgqBsA=; b=FI1vTkLp5g159Uj8cKQ9M9yPg 5o1Cnqp19oMJ6nrpK4zw0M1TH8cDtseJ969So98LRY7NxqWnT2GtIvCesWJy5YogAvFlQcwVLFf9m MdzBWgIc6Eqi9mNeGKEbCZ9AbhgxE+I9yycgXHBgxA5104BGeZr1YZid8L4JBbwIYV/BtyAyk1euz KwZgttgdk5EEc6iqpUf2Bvj3Duy/uTnZNEIAJhQsO9IeHKI/u7syQ7tOl0+F2VQniPR2YGbBcT+Ft 8Xy5MdDaQ7/hyU4s3LkVh3XzSZpYapT3CopyQgW0n2gy4ZTERYvKaCunp9i2GpwSUkZmulS+XvQ7r dl2HpuDSQ==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([2001:4d48:ad52:3201:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:42960) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hw9lA-0003Lr-PB; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 19:37:04 +0100 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hw9l4-0003t7-5w; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 19:36:58 +0100 Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 19:36:58 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin To: Dan Williams Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] [RFC] ARM: remove Intel iop33x and iop13xx support Message-ID: <20190809183658.GA13294@shell.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20190809162956.488941-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20190809163334.489360-1-arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190809_113725_740746_A499F2CE X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.52 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij , Vinod Koul , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Bartosz Golaszewski , soc@kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, Martin Michlmayr , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 11:34:12AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > [ add Martin (if cyrius.com address is still valid) ] > > On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 9:35 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > There are three families of IOP machines we support in Linux: iop32x > > (which includes EP80219), iop33x and iop13xx (aka IOP34x aka WP8134x). > > > > All products we support in the kernel are based on the first of these, > > iop32x, the other families only ever supported the Intel reference > > boards but no actual machine anyone could ever buy. > > > > While one could clearly make them all three work in a single kernel > > with some work, this takes the easy way out, removing the later two > > platforms entirely, under the assumption that there are no remaining > > users. > > > > Earlier versions of OpenWRT and Debian both had support for iop32x > > but not the others, and they both dropped iop32x as well in their 2015 > > releases. > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > > --- > > I'm just guessing that iop32x is still needed, and the other two are > > not. If anyone disagrees with that assessment, let me know so we > > can come up with an alternative approach. > > I'm not sure who would scream if iop32x support went away as well, but > I have not followed this space in years hence copying Martin. > > In any event: > > Acked-by: Dan Williams Those of us who have and still run Thecus N2100's, for example? -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel