From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC893C433FF for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 05:45:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E67A2086C for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 05:45:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="iQetJUy3" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7E67A2086C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=nFyTehMbwf9MF/578f1ye9AZDdr9BhohisPKUMd4C/c=; b=iQetJUy3Vnyw0H hBEBqCduM7lKe0jaT14P8+e3PYu/X9MufqgGAJTir0iH0ztR8R8/G2apOCpMJVFfYyOfaGBGORa5u Ys+ZiT9IrvyhHl7ftdaq1XC9WkRJSHmtMiGDT42mFiKyRHGItUuzVlO/ekhacQxdJk7QhS4Tl4cHg 5TzYpCWHZwfAf4SBJKdxsBw71I6xa5uazT1PXQYX6jiGBtVRJG07Itpz8tsRclJzS174oSR81imj3 9K/4ZJgkUxTQ89WkZsYMBI+95gOBWuKq1UUEnHL65GZLwOjZHbET4+Y98AfZLlMJJ1CWasPrgxM0u X1wXR1wKzO7gROYzfBRQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hy8Zw-00089W-Ok; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 05:45:40 +0000 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32] helo=huawei.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hy8Zf-0007vo-P3 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 05:45:25 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS410-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id E8352C04C9C9B653EB55; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 13:45:10 +0800 (CST) Received: from HGHY4L002753561.china.huawei.com (10.133.215.186) by DGGEMS410-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 13:45:04 +0800 From: Zhen Lei To: Jean-Philippe Brucker , "Jean-Philippe Brucker" , John Garry , "Robin Murphy" , Will Deacon , Joerg Roedel , iommu , linux-arm-kernel , linux-kernel Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: add nr_ats_masters for quickly check Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 13:44:39 +0800 Message-ID: <20190815054439.30652-3-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0.windows.1 In-Reply-To: <20190815054439.30652-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> References: <20190815054439.30652-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.133.215.186] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190814_224523_974578_F64FBFE7 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.73 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Zhen Lei Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org When (smmu_domain->smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_ATS) is true, even if a smmu domain does not contain any ats master, the operations of arm_smmu_atc_inv_to_cmd() and lock protection in arm_smmu_atc_inv_domain() are always executed. This will impact performance, especially in multi-core and stress scenarios. For my FIO test scenario, about 8% performance reduced. In fact, we can use a struct member to record how many ats masters that the smmu contains. And check that without traverse the list and check all masters one by one in the lock protection. Fixes: 9ce27afc0830 ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add support for PCI ATS") Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei --- drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 14 +++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c index 29056d9bb12aa01..154334d3310c9b8 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c @@ -631,6 +631,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_domain { struct io_pgtable_ops *pgtbl_ops; bool non_strict; + int nr_ats_masters; enum arm_smmu_domain_stage stage; union { @@ -1531,7 +1532,16 @@ static int arm_smmu_atc_inv_domain(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain, struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent cmd; struct arm_smmu_master *master; - if (!(smmu_domain->smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_ATS)) + /* + * The protectiom of spinlock(&iommu_domain->devices_lock) is omitted. + * Because for a given master, its map/unmap operations should only be + * happened after it has been attached and before it has been detached. + * So that, if at least one master need to be atc invalidated, the + * value of smmu_domain->nr_ats_masters can not be zero. + * + * This can alleviate performance loss in multi-core scenarios. + */ + if (!smmu_domain->nr_ats_masters) return 0; arm_smmu_atc_inv_to_cmd(ssid, iova, size, &cmd); @@ -1913,6 +1923,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_detach_dev(struct arm_smmu_master *master) spin_lock_irqsave(&smmu_domain->devices_lock, flags); list_del(&master->domain_head); + smmu_domain->nr_ats_masters--; spin_unlock_irqrestore(&smmu_domain->devices_lock, flags); master->domain = NULL; @@ -1968,6 +1979,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev) spin_lock_irqsave(&smmu_domain->devices_lock, flags); list_add(&master->domain_head, &smmu_domain->devices); + smmu_domain->nr_ats_masters++; spin_unlock_irqrestore(&smmu_domain->devices_lock, flags); out_unlock: mutex_unlock(&smmu_domain->init_mutex); -- 1.8.3 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel