From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46420C3A59B for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 03:46:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C0F121721 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 03:46:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="sYeU/wOz"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Tqozy/nZ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1C0F121721 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=qrdzqtCIo4I/9DVOoYDvCepEwfluAio8NMxnzrYjtEE=; b=sYeU/wOzCG1hPt /2GDq19rzw+JRm+s/PchmRVKDzOUtxesivowTAH3MFOiT2nFnpnothxcFm45e7V92Eak9RFuqMj0A 4atxVlfpEN73PnK/W6TozV5Z+dk2jpgPhwY18NCVavEMGtBhiZc58tttuMecdrnevdoPvu9U/CD8q zEnNLcrNCoJAaXbcFgNd5UL1ygpHOlClkhnuizuaDoy4kfV5uQCLdo9RyxdakEHheMKTvRGD97hYv 05abm8yaaVSR0Fp9tDsvUE8EGIsTEmArfbI8FObB3ZRNeg13UTVXjaLp45JrSp/5TtQHesIeay8Lj 8y8GxXdI7/4lYsDHjUzg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hypfU-0007Pp-4e; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 03:46:16 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hypfQ-0007PW-Qp for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 03:46:13 +0000 Received: from kernel.org (unknown [104.132.0.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6DA7E21721; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 03:46:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1566013572; bh=Ceb8jDe4ZN3E1BKGFRkTVG7X9cSBE7uIXb55UYz9P6A=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=Tqozy/nZkkQ+GMDOJjYHBa/24QsMLHgpIYmpe3LiCwmEXw1zqncAgO+gPp0+TLwzv ehFP029agWLq9gcTwZmZ4bn3KhL6A7503G/GvgyuorMvJQexTtdCZw6PznaMPqREI2 FumXZbiqz7ovopHiMVC6X9GOAOul+sF00e4UZUtw= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190817033422.GB14652@Mani-XPS-13-9360> References: <20190705151440.20844-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> <20190705151440.20844-2-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> <20190808050128.E3DA52186A@mail.kernel.org> <20190817033422.GB14652@Mani-XPS-13-9360> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: clock: Add Bitmain BM1880 SoC clock controller binding From: Stephen Boyd To: Manivannan Sadhasivam User-Agent: alot/0.8.1 Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 20:46:11 -0700 Message-Id: <20190817034612.6DA7E21721@mail.kernel.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190816_204612_891833_D13583E2 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.96 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, darren.tsao@bitmain.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, haitao.suo@bitmain.com, fisher.cheng@bitmain.com, alec.lin@bitmain.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Archived-At: List-Archive: Quoting Manivannan Sadhasivam (2019-08-16 20:34:22) > On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 10:01:28PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Manivannan Sadhasivam (2019-07-05 08:14:36) > > > +It is expected that it is defined using standard clock bindings as "osc". > > > + > > > +Example: > > > + > > > + clk: clock-controller@800 { > > > + compatible = "bitmain,bm1880-clk"; > > > + reg = <0xe8 0x0c>,<0x800 0xb0>; > > > > It looks weird still. What hardware module is this actually part of? > > Some larger power manager block? > > > > These are all part of the sysctrl block (clock + pinctrl + reset) and the > register domains got split between system and pll. > And that can't be one node that probes the clk, pinctrl, and reset drivers from C code? _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel