From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982B2C3A59B for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 18:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A674206DF for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 18:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="dWLAihSi" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6A674206DF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=WO0W736luZNPmLhucZBgrYVZUDKYWQ2ZtJ+cvgkwPyE=; b=dWLAihSi4bVoDg 3BzuD1gZlDjAiP0KF9Geh0u1mE7y52cUX9v86B8RjuvF3lx5QavL0pHIUMsX54qK85zjFJn+KiLxE jRtgaJ2hAP/e0JsMH09KAoTVYEBqdbw5F459aFVjG1vA248nQ7irSenZPKptJNJ0wOEkxls8VCPpc EZbo3FDVU1Kv6aLGOfAZWvrbuG1Ds13+JHbk1mHTdGeMTzAMC4xGpX2EeIB3i06L6y6Ulmeygenn2 AOKDWpu8D9zOIZQZszgpNZpoGNK3/tdpdCJ7Nsap9xWs+y99FkP9mBqV2rD+Cf6GTYZyz8r2UBvz9 scZ0S8+Rh1tHlQ692m8g==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hz3Gd-0003xm-Tw; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 18:17:31 +0000 Received: from inca-roads.misterjones.org ([213.251.177.50]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hz3Ga-0003xM-RH for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 18:17:30 +0000 Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=why) by cheepnis.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1hz3GL-0002bG-LD; Sat, 17 Aug 2019 20:17:13 +0200 Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 19:17:10 +0100 From: Marc Zyngier To: Lubomir Rintel Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/19] irqchip/mmp: do not use of_address_to_resource() to get mux regs Message-ID: <20190817191710.539daa01@why> In-Reply-To: References: <20190809093158.7969-1-lkundrak@v3.sk> <20190809093158.7969-6-lkundrak@v3.sk> <16d77ca3-7ad1-3af2-650e-722cf6a931ed@kernel.org> Organization: Approximate X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: lkundrak@v3.sk, olof@lixom.net, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, jason@lakedaemon.net, kishon@ti.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, pavel@ucw.cz X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cheepnis.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190817_111729_029399_34836305 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 26.18 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Jason Cooper , Stephen Boyd , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michael Turquette , Russell King , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Rob Herring , Pavel Machek , Olof Johansson , Thomas Gleixner , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 20:41:22 +0200 Lubomir Rintel wrote: > On Fri, 2019-08-09 at 13:12 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On 09/08/2019 10:31, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > > > The "regs" property of the "mrvl,mmp2-mux-intc" devices are silly. They > > > are offsets from intc's base, not addresses on the parent bus. At this > > > point it probably can't be fixed. > > > > > > On an OLPC XO-1.75 machine, the muxes are children of the intc, not the > > > axi bus, and thus of_address_to_resource() won't work. We should treat > > > the values as mere integers as opposed to bus addresses. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel > > > Acked-by: Pavel Machek > > > > > > --- > > > drivers/irqchip/irq-mmp.c | 20 +++++++++++--------- > > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mmp.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mmp.c > > > index 14618dc0bd396..af9cba4a51c2e 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mmp.c > > > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mmp.c > > > @@ -424,9 +424,9 @@ IRQCHIP_DECLARE(mmp2_intc, "mrvl,mmp2-intc", mmp2_of_init); > > > static int __init mmp2_mux_of_init(struct device_node *node, > > > struct device_node *parent) > > > { > > > - struct resource res; > > > int i, ret, irq, j = 0; > > > u32 nr_irqs, mfp_irq; > > > + u32 reg[4]; > > > > > > if (!parent) > > > return -ENODEV; > > > @@ -438,18 +438,20 @@ static int __init mmp2_mux_of_init(struct device_node *node, > > > pr_err("Not found mrvl,intc-nr-irqs property\n"); > > > return -EINVAL; > > > } > > > - ret = of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &res); > > > + > > > + /* > > > + * For historical reasonsm, the "regs" property of the > > > + * mrvl,mmp2-mux-intc is not a regular * "regs" property containing > > > + * addresses on the parent bus, but offsets from the intc's base. > > > + * That is why we can't use of_address_to_resource() here. > > > + */ > > > + ret = of_property_read_u32_array(node, "reg", reg, ARRAY_SIZE(reg)); > > > > This will return 0 even if you've read less than your expected 4 u32s. > > You may want to try of_property_read_variable_u32_array instead. > > Will it? Unless I'm reading the of_property_read_u32_array() > documentation wrong, it suggests that would return -EOVERFLOW in that > case. You're appear to be right, and I read it wrong. > > It ignores the extra values it the property is larger. I guess that is > not a good thing and we still want to use > of_property_read_variable_u32_array() though. It doesn't hurt to check for all possible problems, specially given that this machine doesn't appear to have a mainline DT (and its OF implementation looks a bit buggy). Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel