From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Raphael Gault <raphael.gault@arm.com>
Cc: raph.gault+kdev@gmail.com, peterz@infradead.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 03/18] objtool: Move registers and control flow to arch-dependent code
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 15:00:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190822200027.e4oidncgyj5oq7to@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190816122403.14994-4-raphael.gault@arm.com>
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 01:23:48PM +0100, Raphael Gault wrote:
> The control flow information and register macro definitions were based on
> the x86_64 architecture but should be abstract so that each architecture
> can define the correct values for the registers, especially the registers
> related to the stack frame (Frame Pointer, Stack Pointer and possibly
> Return Address).
>
> Signed-off-by: Raphael Gault <raphael.gault@arm.com>
> ---
> tools/objtool/arch/x86/include/arch_special.h | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
> tools/objtool/{ => arch/x86/include}/cfi.h | 0
> tools/objtool/check.h | 1 +
> tools/objtool/special.c | 19 +---------
> 4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/objtool/arch/x86/include/arch_special.h
> rename tools/objtool/{ => arch/x86/include}/cfi.h (100%)
>
> diff --git a/tools/objtool/arch/x86/include/arch_special.h b/tools/objtool/arch/x86/include/arch_special.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..424ce47013e3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/objtool/arch/x86/include/arch_special.h
The arch in the filename is redundant. It would be a bit nicer if it
were named "special.h" but I guess that would conflict with the non-arch
special.h, unless we put non-arch headers and arch headers in separate
namespaces somehow. Maybe it's ok for now unless anybody has a better
idea.
> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> +/*
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
> + * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
> + * of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + * along with this program; if not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> + */
Instead of the above can you use the SPDX identifier?
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
And the same comment for the other headers in the patch set.
--
Josh
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-22 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-16 12:23 [RFC v4 00/18] objtool: Add support for arm64 Raphael Gault
2019-08-16 12:23 ` [RFC v4 01/18] objtool: Add abstraction for computation of symbols offsets Raphael Gault
2019-08-22 16:30 ` Julien
2019-08-22 19:57 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-08-16 12:23 ` [RFC v4 02/18] objtool: orc: Refactor ORC API for other architectures to implement Raphael Gault
2019-08-22 19:59 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-08-16 12:23 ` [RFC v4 03/18] objtool: Move registers and control flow to arch-dependent code Raphael Gault
2019-08-22 20:00 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2019-08-16 12:23 ` [RFC v4 04/18] objtool: arm64: Add required implementation for supporting the aarch64 architecture in objtool Raphael Gault
2019-08-22 20:00 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-08-16 12:23 ` [RFC v4 05/18] objtool: special: Adapt special section handling Raphael Gault
2019-08-22 20:02 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-08-22 20:18 ` Julien
2019-08-16 12:23 ` [RFC v4 06/18] objtool: arm64: Adapt the stack frame checks for arm architecture Raphael Gault
2019-08-22 20:03 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-08-16 12:23 ` [RFC v4 07/18] objtool: Introduce INSN_UNKNOWN type Raphael Gault
2019-08-22 20:04 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-08-22 20:45 ` Julien
2019-08-22 21:51 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-08-16 12:23 ` [RFC v4 08/18] objtool: Refactor switch-tables code to support other architectures Raphael Gault
2019-08-22 20:04 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-08-16 12:23 ` [RFC v4 09/18] gcc-plugins: objtool: Add plugin to detect switch table on arm64 Raphael Gault
2019-08-22 20:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-08-16 12:23 ` [RFC v4 10/18] objtool: arm64: Implement functions to add switch tables alternatives Raphael Gault
2019-08-23 16:35 ` Julien
2019-08-16 12:23 ` [RFC v4 11/18] arm64: alternative: Mark .altinstr_replacement as containing executable instructions Raphael Gault
2019-08-16 12:23 ` [RFC v4 12/18] arm64: assembler: Add macro to annotate asm function having non standard stack-frame Raphael Gault
2019-08-22 20:10 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-08-16 12:23 ` [RFC v4 13/18] arm64: sleep: Prevent stack frame warnings from objtool Raphael Gault
2019-08-22 20:16 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-08-16 12:23 ` [RFC v4 14/18] arm64: kvm: Annotate non-standard stack frame functions Raphael Gault
2019-08-16 12:24 ` [RFC v4 15/18] arm64: kernel: Add exception on kuser32 to prevent stack analysis Raphael Gault
2019-08-16 12:24 ` [RFC v4 16/18] arm64: crypto: Add exceptions for crypto object " Raphael Gault
2019-08-22 20:19 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-08-16 12:24 ` [RFC v4 17/18] arm64: kernel: Annotate non-standard stack frame functions Raphael Gault
2019-08-16 12:24 ` [RFC v4 18/18] objtool: arm64: Enable stack validation for arm64 Raphael Gault
2019-08-22 19:56 ` [RFC v4 00/18] objtool: Add support " Josh Poimboeuf
2019-08-23 12:00 ` Raphael Gault
2019-10-14 8:37 ` Julien Thierry
2019-10-14 13:27 ` Raphaël Gault
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190822200027.e4oidncgyj5oq7to@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raph.gault+kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=raphael.gault@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).