From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8437C3A5A1 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 02:47:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 996DE21897 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 02:47:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="uXGNRfQf" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 996DE21897 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To :From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: List-Owner; bh=29yG9wjmbsj6ppN8nxJezwg4FhCjh8AkhFzVHEeLbX8=; b=uXGNRfQfkiS1dJ BBwRO7oSO2NCWw/GNk+dhYpEA1sGZNDYFGjtDbFTig08qNZ8OBfjRyEHse5V8pC0UDwmQLXKbRWnX Ws8hOgVlwEW4DDYRAImeaBfPDIZCaVLc3gTkRG0ecwtOxkkH7bqMUXBq8gEFHCkt5iSWNi6QkKEfc GEok1nUtI6+HT9mOWimCulDL7OZbh8jZtqK6WDI17hrRhE7qp/YTQqFHKC0rXwl0/aLwi/fccWvF+ BMiAuuBdMr+nMRMDYvlZcgLnazKYeBdFl91CAieyovERmxvD8bXtbxrVWxgmaeGeMzyl4Lxog9Jxq nngLgC51dGFHlw0vmulw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i0zc5-0006f6-QX; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 02:47:42 +0000 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32] helo=huawei.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i0zbU-0006B5-Hy for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 02:47:07 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 19377A30A9AEE019E02A; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:46:55 +0800 (CST) Received: from HGHY4L002753561.china.huawei.com (10.133.215.186) by DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:46:47 +0800 From: Zhen Lei To: Jean-Philippe Brucker , John Garry , Robin Murphy , Will Deacon , Joerg Roedel , iommu , linux-arm-kernel Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] improve the concurrency of arm_smmu_atc_inv_domain() Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:45:49 +0800 Message-ID: <20190823024551.24448-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0.windows.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.133.215.186] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190822_194704_768972_E304E1C0 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.22 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Zhen Lei Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org v2 --> v3: As Will Deacon's suggestion, I changed the lock type of arm_smmu_domain.devices_lock from spinlock_t to rwlock_t, and I saw that the performance is all right. And further use nr_ats_masters to quickly check have no obvious effect, so I drop it. Here is the performance data tested on my board: Withou any change: Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.1% done] [9798M/0K /s] [2392K/0 iops] [09h:59m:13s] Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.1% done] [9782M/0K /s] [2388K/0 iops] [09h:59m:12s] Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.2% done] [9825M/0K /s] [2399K/0 iops] [09h:59m:11s] Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.2% done] [9836M/0K /s] [2401K/0 iops] [09h:59m:10s] Change lock type from spinlock_t to rwlock_t: Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.1% done] [10996M/0K /s] [2685K/0 iops] [09h:59m:13s] Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.1% done] [10817M/0K /s] [2641K/0 iops] [09h:59m:12s] Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.2% done] [11083M/0K /s] [2706K/0 iops] [09h:59m:11s] Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.2% done] [10603M/0K /s] [2589K/0 iops] [09h:59m:10s] Use nr_ats_masters: Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.2% done] [11105M/0K /s] [2711K/0 iops] [eta 09h:58m:40s] Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.2% done] [10511M/0K /s] [2566K/0 iops] [eta 09h:58m:39s] Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.2% done] [10560M/0K /s] [2578K/0 iops] [eta 09h:58m:38s] Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.2% done] [10494M/0K /s] [2562K/0 iops] [eta 09h:58m:37s] Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.2% done] [10528M/0K /s] [2570K/0 iops] [eta 09h:58m:36s] Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.3% done] [10638M/0K /s] [2597K/0 iops] [eta 09h:58m:35s] Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.3% done] [11158M/0K /s] [2724K/0 iops] [eta 09h:58m:34s] Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.3% done] [11386M/0K /s] [2780K/0 iops] [eta 09h:58m:32s] Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.3% done] [11118M/0K /s] [2714K/0 iops] [eta 09h:58m:32s] Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.3% done] [11031M/0K /s] [2693K/0 iops] [eta 09h:58m:31s] Jobs: 24 (f=24): [0.3% done] [11361M/0K /s] [2774K/0 iops] [eta 09h:58m:30s] v1 --> v2: 1. change the type of nr_ats_masters from atomic_t to int, and move its ind/dec operation from arm_smmu_enable_ats()/arm_smmu_disable_ats() to arm_smmu_attach_dev()/arm_smmu_detach_dev(), and protected by "spin_lock_irqsave(&smmu_domain->devices_lock, flags);" Zhen Lei (2): iommu/arm-smmu-v3: don't add a master into smmu_domain before it's ready iommu/arm-smmu-v3: change the lock type of arm_smmu_domain.devices_lock drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) -- 1.8.3 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel