Re: [RFC PATCH V2 4/4] platform: mtk-isp: Add Mediatek FD driver

[Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>]

Hello,

On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 05:07:21PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 8:58 PM Jerry-ch Chen wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-07-29 at 17:57 +0800, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 3:01 PM Jerry-ch Chen wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2019-07-09 at 18:56 +0800, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:
> >>>> On 09.07.19 10:41, Jerry-ch Chen wrote:
> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-isp/fd/mtk_fd.h b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-isp/fd/mtk_fd.h
> >>>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>>> index 0000000..289999b
> >>>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-isp/fd/mtk_fd.h
> >>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
> >>>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> >>>>> +//
> >>>>> +// Copyright (c) 2018 MediaTek Inc.
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +#ifndef __MTK_FD_HW_H__
> >>>>> +#define __MTK_FD_HW_H__
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +#include <linux/io.h>
> >>>>> +#include <linux/types.h>
> >>>>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >>>>> +#include <media/v4l2-ctrls.h>
> >>>>> +#include <media/v4l2-device.h>
> >>>>> +#include <media/videobuf2-v4l2.h>
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +#define MTK_FD_OUTPUT_MIN_WIDTH                    26U
> >>>>> +#define MTK_FD_OUTPUT_MIN_HEIGHT           26U
> >>>>> +#define MTK_FD_OUTPUT_MAX_WIDTH                    640U
> >>>>> +#define MTK_FD_OUTPUT_MAX_HEIGHT           480U
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +/* Control the user defined image widths and heights
> >>>>> + * to be scaled and performed face detection in FD HW.
> >>>>> + * MTK FD support up to 14 user defined image sizes to perform face detection.
> >>>>> + */
> >>>>> +#define V4L2_CID_MTK_FD_SCALE_IMG_WIDTH            (V4L2_CID_USER_MTK_FD_BASE + 1)
> >>>>> +#define V4L2_CID_MTK_FD_SCALE_IMG_HEIGHT   (V4L2_CID_USER_MTK_FD_BASE + 2)
> >>>>
> >>>> I've got a *really* bad feeling about introducing chip specific
> >>>> uapi stuff. (by the way: uapi stuff belongs into include/uapi/...)
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for your comments,
> >>>
> >>> If we remain chip-specific control IDs, I will move the uapi stuff into
> >>> inlcude/uapi/mtk_fd.h (filename TBD)
> >>>
> >>>> Maybe you could tell us what that's *really* about, so we can find some
> >>>> standard / chip-independent api for these things. That's one of the
> >>>> major point of the kernel: hardware abstraction.
> >>>
> >>> I am not sure if it is possible for us to add some standard
> >>> v4l2-controls for face detection, a further explanations of controls are
> >>> listed below.
> >>>
> >>> In v4l2-controls, there exists V4L2_CID_DETECT_CLASS, but I haven't
> >>> found the standards or api that can be used for face detection yet.
> >>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-controls.h#L1092
> >>>
> >>> For detecting certain face angle and head direction, we would need
> >>> V4L2_CID_DETECT_ANGLE, V4L2_CID_DETECT_DIRECTION controls for user to
> >>> specify the angle and direction to be detected.
> >>> In MTK FD driver, we support the following angles and directions to be
> >>> selected by user, and they are both multiple selected .
> >>> FD_angle_table[] = {-90, -45, 0 , 45, 90}
> >>> FD_direction_table[] = {0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, ..., 330}
> >>>
> >>> Assuming these v4l2-controls are array of V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_U16 with
> >>> dimension 5 and 12.
> >>> User can select the desired angle and directions to be detected into
> >>> arrays and bring it to driver by these controls, however, the more they
> >>> select, the longer execution time needed by HW.
> >>
> >> Sounds like we need some kind of a menu bitmask control here, but I
> >> don't see V4L2 having anything like that.
> >>
> >> Hans, Sakari, any ideas?
> >>
> >>> For detecting different sizes of faces and increase the detection speed,
> >>> FD driver might need to scales down the input image into different
> >>> smaller sizes
> >>
> >> Do you mean the FD hardware would do the scaling or the driver code
> >> itself? It would be undesirable to do such scaling in a kernel driver,
> >> so if that's not something handled by the hardware, the downscaled
> >> image might need to be provided from the userspace.
> >
> > Thanks for your comments.
> >
> > Yes, FD hardware will do the scaling itself, so driver could set the
> > sizes.
> >
> >> >, besides driver default values, user or proprietary
> >>> algorithm library can manually set the desired image sizes, therefore,
> >>> we would need the following controls:
> >>> V4L2_CID_DETECT_SCALE_DOWN_IMG_WIDTH and
> >>> V4L2_CID_DETECT_SCALE_DOWN_IMG_HEIGHT.
> >>> In MTK FD driver, we implement these controls as array of
> >>> V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_U16 with the dimension 15.
> >>
> >> Why 15?
> >
> > It consists of one input image size and 14 down-scaled image sizes,
> > the amount 15 (or say 14) is defined by the MTK FD algo library,
> > therefore I remain the number of 15 here for communicate with the
> > library.
> > Maybe it should be defined as following?
> > MTK_FD_MAX_SCALE_SIZE_NUM               14
> > and
> > MTK_FD_SCALE_ARR_NUM                    15
> >
> >>> For controlling detection speed, we would need the
> >>> V4L2_CID_DETECT_SPEED, the faster speedup implies the lower accuracy of
> >>> detection, In MTK FD driver, the max level of speedup is 7, and default
> >>> value is 0.
> >>>
> >>> For MTK FD algorithm user library, they would need select extra
> >>> detection features(models) used in HW, we need
> >>> V4L2_CID_MTK_FD_EXTRA_MODEL, this will be set to 1 for using extra
> >>> model. However, we are considering make this control more
> >>> chip-independent and can be added into standard.
> >>> for example, V4L2_CID_DETECTION_FD_MODEL or ...FD_ALGO,
> >>> drivers can define the detection algorithm or detection model to be used
> >>> for users to select. How do you think?
> >>
> >> Sounds like something that could be a menu control, so it could vary
> >> between drivers.
> >
> > Ok, and maybe it should be created by v4l2_ctrl_new_int_menu(...)?
> >
> >>> In short, I summery the control IDs as following:
> >>> V4L2_CID_DETECT_ANGLE: set the angle of face in degrees. 90 ~ -90
> >>> degrees.
> >>> V4L2_CID_DETECT_DIRECTION: set the rotation of the head in degrees.
> >>> 0~330 degrees.
> >>> V4L2_CID_DETECT_SCALE_DOWN_IMG_WIDTH: set the image widths for an input
> >>> image to be scaled down for face detection
> >>> V4L2_CID_DETECT_SCALE_DOWN_IMG_HEIGHT: set the image heights for an
> >>> input image to be scaled down for face detection
> >>> V4L2_CID_DETECT_SPEED: set the detection speed, usually reducing
> >>> accuracy.
> >>> V4L2_CID_DETECTION_FD_MODEL: select the detection model or algorithm to
> >>> be used by face detection driver.
> >>>
> >>>>> +#define ENABLE_FD                          0x111
> >>>>> +#define FD_HW_ENABLE                               0x4
> >>>>> +#define FD_INT_EN                          0x15c
> >>>>> +#define FD_INT                                     0x168
> >>>>> +#define FD_RESULT                          0x178
> >>>>> +#define FD_IRQ_MASK                                0x001
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +#define RS_MAX_BUF_SIZE                            2288788
> >>>>> +#define FD_MAX_SPEEDUP                             7
> >>>>> +#define FD_MAX_POSE_VAL                            0xfffffffffffffff
> >>>>> +#define FD_DEF_POSE_VAL                            0x3ff
> >>>>> +#define MAX_FD_SEL_NUM                             1026
> >>>>
> >>>> If that file is supposed to be included by anything beyond the driver
> >>>> itself, we need proper prefixing. (same for anything else in here)
> >>>
> >>> I will fix it as following:
> >>>
> >>> #define FD_ENABLE    0x111
> >>>
> >>> #define FD_REG_OFFSET_HW_ENABLE  0x4
> >>> #define FD_REG_OFFSET_INT_EN     0x15c
> >>> #define FD_REG_OFFSET_INT_VAL    0x168
> >>> #define FD_REG_OFFSET_RESULT     0x178
> >>>
> >>> #define FD_IRQ_MASK         1
> >>> #define FD_MAX_RS_BUF_SIZE  2288788
> >>> #define FD_MAX_SPEEDUP      7
> >>> #define FD_MAX_RESULT_NUM   1026
> >>
> >> I'd suggest the MTK_FD_ prefix.
> >
> > Ok, I will use MTK_FD_ prefix.
> >
> >>>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-controls.h b/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-controls.h
> >>>>> index 3dcfc61..eae876e 100644
> >>>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-controls.h
> >>>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-controls.h
> >>>>> @@ -192,6 +192,10 @@ enum v4l2_colorfx {
> >>>>>   * We reserve 16 controls for this driver. */
> >>>>>  #define V4L2_CID_USER_IMX_BASE                     (V4L2_CID_USER_BASE + 0x10b0)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +/* The base for the mediatek FD driver controls */
> >>>>> +/* We reserve 16 controls for this driver. */
> >>>>> +#define V4L2_CID_USER_MTK_FD_BASE          (V4L2_CID_USER_BASE + 0x10d0)
> >>>>
> >>>> Why only the base, but not the actual IDs in uapi ?
> >>>>
> >>> I will put actual IDs in uapi/ for user to reference.
> 
> Enrico, any thoughts on the explanation that Jerry provided and
> further discussion above?

I agree with Enrico that standardising the face detection API is the way
to go.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel