From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D31D7C4360C for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 10:16:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A16A72086A for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 10:16:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="XCrWbhUu" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A16A72086A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=dVF9tj/6lklN2AugKD5Vs6lVnjmQIfV7MdDKCXR7224=; b=XCrWbhUuUv0Lr+ 6xYNgedPMLnXLaCsEpRRzbG5E9+P5gJnME4zc6xEZM7bXrGG7PngtSQv1JNiXP/Oh60WUyEEcVSWb L/iBfhuyfGCXMVZnK5Tsnzyy2m3V2dYX5CfFqrQva1w/OpMGcyHMbSm/XCxnzzjrp56MMdJhEBRqp dhZHY+1bCMUQTfnNgOyTrpGXchuOgyOImOlqGGGI+EzM8VVzsci+BZRkNe03Yrs+EOdF2TyHTK/Et KALzXPLKy131rhJzm1r/tRVjU4pvJXiHP2n2YiNLZxJZe/wi796V0/GD0ph8fyCMhEVelAqgk1wHg qQkRfI/S6CZIacsAwMoA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.2 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iEWFn-00089M-H0; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 10:16:35 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.2 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iEWFk-000894-HD for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 10:16:33 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18DBF1000; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 03:16:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MBP.local (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7BB163F534; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 03:16:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 11:16:24 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: ja.kaisrlik@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: update Kconfig to better handle CMDLINE Message-ID: <20190929101624.GA94161@MBP.local> References: <20190920164249.6935-1-ja.kaisrlik@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190920164249.6935-1-ja.kaisrlik@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.2 (2019-01-07) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190929_031632_614078_167E60DA X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.95 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: will@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 06:42:49PM +0200, ja.kaisrlik@gmail.com wrote: > Added a menu to choose how to CMDLINE will be handled. Config strings > were copied from arm32 port. This was proposed before but we rejected it. Do you have a good reason, other than arm32 having it? https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9459341/ -- Catalin _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel