From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB5FC4360C for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 18:23:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87CE7217F5 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 18:23:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="sIDX69kL"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="tIYVkbVQ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 87CE7217F5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lixom.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Gji1ts5LToiZRen7g/7KKZI0udl8fniJWCbTNrJ+Dh8=; b=sIDX69kLpeJ1Wk hbhNUCd5WeJcO1qrSOO6hNkaYE3Fg+z2+EhdTT/ED9E6O4x0REuc5XCqwg+TSGvYM2rPZjseN5Wcu AQ3D7WRipKOmqwL3BNc5F9paHRVZA7MBcMUft0aHQLP1V7bIVEK/vQAaN3WOYNCh6MPwoWeJA2VHG X4xcdR63ndqysytLMYOvXrPpQE5EzfOTFdY4MLjTtDEq870w24pTVHgukDa+nPQ+SCC5Mf8MGzv1h MXDeb3zc75A9Pmo3RwXhlC/3moJ8vRgK2muxzNdeNEYewjP8ISOEwv1k4f4bR9XIT9P4hzQ6oV0yU ghFKDMfRebf3Gm2lNnEA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.2 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iEdqX-0003L6-1P; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 18:23:01 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-x144.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::144]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.2 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iEdq0-0002vW-7T for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 18:22:29 +0000 Received: by mail-lf1-x144.google.com with SMTP id w6so5353260lfl.2 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 11:22:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=I2oOR5tvCS97CthrHouvMSqg5pOQDzVvDjebg3lF4eM=; b=tIYVkbVQOZCJMPpJ0sLuPNRCxg4cehWVsLNJuRCbXOw0B5uzh6+q5cRrJHRzVTX1oY a1+/RSOmlVhyZ4vsLMGp55DUYlMuzii6M9Zn6glgxrVC5aoytx8VI1mbu9iI7jFf11bE CK1dsllj2ogxETE2uYTWK4dw1aSgEizTjKhYH7uBpiG4dz+QdYVheodqMk7F7yTmldqn xytIQQ2JfklxD1ZOmaGA9c0gA0LgqHwXimUHrFHQGpsuISXKkMhjpMwcAK5u/9N8EBJT q+aqVpwRztj35nMZzukQLm1TVeezBR3kkc6cqsKlmxdIC/pjspeizZBffSrAa2qWE/Ok cwYg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=I2oOR5tvCS97CthrHouvMSqg5pOQDzVvDjebg3lF4eM=; b=TuzZwRzBLtMVpCn+3I+dSdu4VUrsUjYHS6fVSUA0DGYtuaxdpl9xBRUCfH/yJjoxXd oCoZX7Sty+ru3rTrxSWRch1xQ5v6bNd/6sNzoRtMsDGwKTl6xYxdlenhDndBXTOIKhMf VeuHEcFtZ8mfDl8/Gi/rxyFiBpp4c5APnky0N/miyfttfRdV2kdjOwnWzztzYuM7tlKt WVT0MzmS+UPtRwS+uzzfo2H3jTyvNDYJWni8laN5pka/xZkXilLZUjORkJKtJ3ELdOgN EiNInRrj9GjpnpZHUSiMEV7tXC/cWVsPlt8KJCofS5ztonvuWWNm4MMMpm6SgieqoQsn BGOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV+vIv2+WCa+uUgAjtnQEsofIXeNdYzfuOJbqUHpezbgIW/ClkF L5jlEjP4C7KUQ0V8YqXRCYvEHA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyNAiN5/diZRd39+iCMS5W2kHJDnF2GMM0abR1vMgUrxxMRPqXHBdEW+qUBiJnvzJdG1SpQXw== X-Received: by 2002:a19:8a0b:: with SMTP id m11mr9035909lfd.4.1569781343744; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 11:22:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (h85-30-9-151.cust.a3fiber.se. [85.30.9.151]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p3sm2520051ljn.78.2019.09.29.11.22.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 29 Sep 2019 11:22:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 10:51:34 -0700 From: Olof Johansson To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 1/2] arm64: dts: exynos: Pull for v5.4 Message-ID: <20190929175134.fsieffurfdiqhpj2@localhost> References: <20190911183632.4317-1-krzk@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190929_112228_295248_97CB748E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.98 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: DTML , "moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , SoC Team , arm-soc , Kukjin Kim , Linux ARM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi, On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 08:32:47AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 23:07, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 8:36 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Unfortunately the patches were applied right after closing the linux-next. > > > > Hi Krzysztof, > > > > I took a look at these and am not convinced this is right: > > > > > 1. Fix boot of Exynos7 due to wrong address/size of memory node, > > > > The current state is clearly broken and a fix is needed, but > > I'm not sure this is the right fix. Why do you have 32-bit physical > > addressing on a 64-bit chip? I looked at commit ef72171b3621 > > that introduced it, and it seems it would be better to just > > revert back to 64-bit addresses. > > We discussed with Marek Szyprowski that either we can go back to > 64-bit addressing or stick to 32. There are not known boards with more > than 4 GB of RAM so from this point of view the choice was irrelevant. > At the end of discussion I mentioned to stick with other arm64 boards > (although not all), so revert to have 64 bit address... but Marek > chosen differently. Since you ask, let's go back with revert. > > > > > > 2. Move GPU under /soc node, > > > > No problem > > > > > 3. Minor cleanup of #address-cells. > > > > IIRC, an interrupt-controller is required to have a #address-cells > > property, even if that is normally zero. I don't remember the > > details, but the gic binding lists it as mandatory, and I think > > the PCI interrupt-map relies on it. I would just drop this patch. > > Indeed, binding requires both address and size cells. I'll drop it. Looking through the history of pending material, I didn't see a new pull for this material. Just checking in to see if there's something we missed? Thanks, -Olof _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel