On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 02:53:52PM +0200, Fabrice Gasnier wrote: > Split breakinput routine that configures STM32 timers 'break' safety > feature upon probe, into two routines: > - stm32_pwm_apply_breakinputs() sets all the break inputs into registers. > - stm32_pwm_probe_breakinputs() probes the device tree break input settings > before calling stm32_pwm_apply_breakinputs() > > This is a precursor patch to ease PM support. Registers content may get > lost during low power. So, break input settings applied upon probe need > to be restored upon resume (e.g. by calling stm32_pwm_apply_breakinputs()). > > Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier > --- > drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. I've made some minor changes, mostly for consistency with other drivers and the PWM core. See below. > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c > index 359b085..cf8658c 100644 > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c > @@ -19,6 +19,12 @@ > #define CCMR_CHANNEL_MASK 0xFF > #define MAX_BREAKINPUT 2 > > +struct stm32_breakinput { > + u32 index; > + u32 level; > + u32 filter; > +}; > + > struct stm32_pwm { > struct pwm_chip chip; > struct mutex lock; /* protect pwm config/enable */ > @@ -26,15 +32,11 @@ struct stm32_pwm { > struct regmap *regmap; > u32 max_arr; > bool have_complementary_output; > + struct stm32_breakinput breakinput[MAX_BREAKINPUT]; > + unsigned int nbreakinput; I changed these to breakinputs and num_breakinputs since they are slightly more consistent with the naming elsewhere in PWM. > u32 capture[4] ____cacheline_aligned; /* DMA'able buffer */ > }; > > -struct stm32_breakinput { > - u32 index; > - u32 level; > - u32 filter; > -}; > - > static inline struct stm32_pwm *to_stm32_pwm_dev(struct pwm_chip *chip) > { > return container_of(chip, struct stm32_pwm, chip); > @@ -512,15 +514,27 @@ static int stm32_pwm_set_breakinput(struct stm32_pwm *priv, > return (bdtr & bke) ? 0 : -EINVAL; > } > > -static int stm32_pwm_apply_breakinputs(struct stm32_pwm *priv, > +static int stm32_pwm_apply_breakinputs(struct stm32_pwm *priv) > +{ > + int i, ret = 0; Made i unsigned int. > + > + for (i = 0; i < priv->nbreakinput && !ret; i++) { > + ret = stm32_pwm_set_breakinput(priv, > + priv->breakinput[i].index, > + priv->breakinput[i].level, > + priv->breakinput[i].filter); > + } I thought this was a little odd, so I changed it to explicitly check the value of ret and return on error. > + > + return ret; And then this became "return 0;" > +} > + > +static int stm32_pwm_probe_breakinputs(struct stm32_pwm *priv, > struct device_node *np) > { > - struct stm32_breakinput breakinput[MAX_BREAKINPUT]; > - int nb, ret, i, array_size; > + int nb, ret, array_size; > > nb = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "st,breakinput", > sizeof(struct stm32_breakinput)); > - Dropped this since it made the code look cluttered. Thierry > /* > * Because "st,breakinput" parameter is optional do not make probe > * failed if it doesn't exist. > @@ -531,20 +545,14 @@ static int stm32_pwm_apply_breakinputs(struct stm32_pwm *priv, > if (nb > MAX_BREAKINPUT) > return -EINVAL; > > + priv->nbreakinput = nb; > array_size = nb * sizeof(struct stm32_breakinput) / sizeof(u32); > ret = of_property_read_u32_array(np, "st,breakinput", > - (u32 *)breakinput, array_size); > + (u32 *)priv->breakinput, array_size); > if (ret) > return ret; > > - for (i = 0; i < nb && !ret; i++) { > - ret = stm32_pwm_set_breakinput(priv, > - breakinput[i].index, > - breakinput[i].level, > - breakinput[i].filter); > - } > - > - return ret; > + return stm32_pwm_apply_breakinputs(priv); > } > > static void stm32_pwm_detect_complementary(struct stm32_pwm *priv) > @@ -614,7 +622,7 @@ static int stm32_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (!priv->regmap || !priv->clk) > return -EINVAL; > > - ret = stm32_pwm_apply_breakinputs(priv, np); > + ret = stm32_pwm_probe_breakinputs(priv, np); > if (ret) > return ret; > > -- > 2.7.4 >