From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Yuehaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Cc: alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl, tiwai@suse.com,
codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com, perex@perex.cz,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] ASoC: atmel: Fix build error
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 12:11:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191017111137.GB4976@sirena.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c0a0ddc9-5ae4-8b5e-1d77-b322970651bd@huawei.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 878 bytes --]
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 03:32:01PM +0800, Yuehaibing wrote:
> ping..., this issue still in linux-next 20191017
Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so
on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been
review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.
Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
for the subsystem are normally handled.
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-17 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-28 8:16 [PATCH -next] ASoC: atmel: Fix build error YueHaibing
2019-09-30 15:58 ` Michał Mirosław
2019-09-30 16:01 ` Michał Mirosław
2019-10-17 7:32 ` Yuehaibing
2019-10-17 11:11 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2019-10-17 7:51 ` Marc Gonzalez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191017111137.GB4976@sirena.co.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).