On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:24:21AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 10:16, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:

> > I see your argument, but I was just going on the side of consistency because
> > we're continuing to expose other features as HWCAPs when the capability is
> > just a proxy for the cpuid field. I was in favour of stopping the addition
> > of such HWCAPs years ago, but I couldn't convince Catalin ;)

> > The way I see it, we'll soon run out of HWCAP2 bits and then we'll have
> > our hand forced.

> I don't have a strong opinion either way.

Me either, or at least not enough to object to doing it - Will?
Catalin?