Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Removing support for 32bit KVM/arm host

[Takashi Yoshi <takashi@yoshi.email>]

Dear Arnd

Please excuse my late response.

On Sat, 22 Feb 2020 22:31:40 +0100 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 3:40 PM Takashi Yoshi <takashi@yoshi.email>
> wrote:
> > On Monday, 10.02.2020, 14:13 +0000 Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > KVM/arm was merged just over 7 years ago, and has lived a very
> > > quiet life so far. It mostly works if you're prepared to deal
> > > with its limitations, it has been a good prototype for the arm64
> > > version, but it suffers a few problems:
> > >
> > > - It is incomplete (no debug support, no PMU)
> > > - It hasn't followed any of the architectural evolutions
> > > - It has zero users (I don't count myself here)
> >
> > I might not be an important user, but I have been for multiple years
> > and still am a regular user of KVM/arm32 on different devices.
> >
> > I use KVM on my Tegra K1 Chromebook for app development and have
> > multiple SBCs at home on which I run VMs on using KVM+libvirt.
> >
> > Sure, neither of these devices has many resources available, but
> > they are working fine. I would love to keep them in service since I
> > haven't found arm64-based replacements that don't require hours
> > upon hours of tinkering to just get a basic OS installation running
> > with a mainline kernel.
> >
> > As an example that they can still be of use in 2020 I'd like to
> > point out that one of the SBCs is running my DNS resolver, LDAP
> > server, RSS reader, IRC bouncer, and shared todo list just fine,
> > each in their separate VM.
> 
> Thank you for providing an important data point to this question.
> 
> > > - It is more and more getting in the way of new arm64 developments
> > >
> > > So here it is: unless someone screams and shows that they rely on
> > > KVM/arm to be maintained upsteam, I'll remove 32bit host support
> > > form the tree.
> >
> > *scream*
> >
> > > One of the reasons that makes me confident nobody is
> > > using it is that I never receive *any* bug report. Yes, it is
> > > perfect.
> >
> > This assumption is deeply flawed. Most users (including me) are not
> > subscribed to this mailing list and will never find this thread at
> > all. I myself stumbled upon this discussion just by chance while I
> > was browsing the web trying to find something completely unrelated.
> >
> > I've been using KVM on x86, ppc and arm for many years, yet I never
> > felt the need to report a bug on the mailing list.
> > (This is to be interpreted as a compliment to the great work the
> > devs of KVM have done!)
> >
> > Just going by the number of bugs reported on a developers mailing
> > list is not going to paint an accurate picture.
> >
> > I am convinced that I'm not the only one relying on KVM/arm32 in the
> > mainline kernel and would ask you to please reconsider keeping
> > arm32 in the mainline kernel for a few more years until adequate
> > arm64 replacements are available on the market and have gained
> > proper support in the mainline kernel.
> 
> Can you provide some more information about how you use KVM on 32-bit
> machines, to make it possible to better estimate how many others might
> do the same,

Sure.
First of all I own different ARM boards. Currently I virtualise on
Banana Pi M1 (1GB), cubox-i (2GB) and my Acer Chromebook (4GB).

The Chromebook is my travel laptop on which I have three VMs on (LAMP,
PostgreSQL, kernel testing) which I primarily use to develop against.

The others are "home servers", they run all kinds of things for my home
(incl. DNS, LDAP, RSS-Reader, Wiki, Music-Database, RDBMS,
Task-Management).

> and how long you will need to upgrade to newer kernels for?

I don't really have a strict policy regarding when to upgrade kernels.
I just run whatever gets patched and works.

Sometimes this is the latest stable release, most of the time this is
the last longterm release.

> In particular:
> 
> - What is the smallest amount of physical RAM that you have to found
> to make a usable ARM/KVM host? 

Not sure if I can answer this question adequately as the smallest of my
ARM32 boards have at least 1GB of RAM, which works for sure.

Since you're asking about the smallest amount I did some experiments.
I spun up the testing VM on my Chromebook. It consists of a basic
Gentoo userland currently running on a "reduced" 4.19 kernel (I'm sure
it could be stripped further if one was determined enough).

When I boot it up and log in the qemu-system process on the host uses
100MB. The memory usage (incl. cache) inside the VM is only 50 MB,
though.

Adding a few MB for the actual application one would want to run to
these 100MB, I calculate with 160MB for a "lightweight" VM.

This would mean that one could run 2-3 such VMs in just 512MB which I
would count as "usable".

If you were conservative with memory and used a lightweight distro, like
Alpine, OpenWrt or built your own using Buildroot, I could imagine that
you can make a nice little home router with virtualized DHCP server,
DNS server (for home network) + resolver, TFTP and possibly VPN in
512MB.
(Sounds like a cool experiment for the next time im bored :P)


A very different use case could be to host unikernels using e.g.
Solo5 (https://github.com/Solo5/solo5) whose hvt backend also uses KVM.
I, unfortunately, don't have any experience with unikernels, but I
assume that they consume a lot less memory than a full Linux VM.


> Note that the 4GB configuration of the Tegra K1 (an rk3288)
> Chromebooks seems to be extremely rare in other devices, while most
> new 32-bit SBCs come with 1GB or less these days.

I agree that 4GB seems to be really rare in 32-bit land outside of
laptops like Chromebooks or Novena, but I don't agree that most 32-bit
SBCs are so low specced.

There are quite a few 2GB boards out there:
ODROID U2/U3/X2/XU/XU3/XU4/HC1/HC2, Cubieboard 3/4/5, HummingBoard,
CuBox i4/Pulse, ASUS TinkerBoard (S), Lenovo G66 TV-Box, Radxa ROCK PRO
/ Rock2, Nvidia Jetson TK1, Banana Pi M2U/M3, Firefly RK3288,
BeagleBoard X15, OrangePi Plus 2E, Utilite, Wandboard, ClearFog,
NetGate SC3100, and probably a lot more can be had with 2GB RAM.

(If I were to buy an SBC for virtualization, I'd get one of these :-))

Also lets not forget all the powerful smartphones out there which could
be used as virtualizers using postmarketos.org.

> - How often do you update the host kernels on those 32-bit machines
> that you still use to newer releases? 

I usually track the latest longterm branch (but I wait a bit before
jumping to a new longterm). So at the moment the majority is running
4.19.x, but I'm in the process of upgrading to 5.4.x now that most of
the annoying bugs should be fixed ;-)

> What is the oldest/newest you run at the moment?

Oldest: 4.15.18 (because of an annoying regression that's likely never
going to get fixed)
Newest: 5.4.20

> - Are you able to move the host installation to a distribution with a
> long-term stable release cycle such as Debian, Ubuntu that gives you
> a ~five year support after a kernel release?

I could do that, but I would like to avoid being dependent on an old
kernel as from personal experience even on so-called "longterm"
releases regressions do slip in and tend not to get fixed if they're
not too severe, especially in old distro kernels.

Kind regards,

- Yoshi

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel