From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59497C3F2D2 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 16:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A0832469C for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 16:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="rNAh+R6+" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2A0832469C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=Huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=qHAxvleJRycbTk00ajiqkjrlyu9DtZv3AvAXJT+33sQ=; b=rNAh+R6+B/GpI/ menM88CPovT8+AcpVtxvD4v8EC4NRq5WFP7+aFWA0hSR5yNL/rxHXrfd+xUqvQrXdcacdDjyk1FaA Q3zKWp036UlBWiPkqJ3ck+NAbvp+xYG9x9xYO8343xLKd9pQMODv8XZQE10K5ebNz0Lm8HUlx5ouz fSOVc9MEuWxYpwXL/i5CI5VkB336xZaexa3CzuEOtWeTEXnF1RLTx3fmQtlslm+b5/P/ERdfylaCN WsXPTxVBzDytDDdDwj3H7VHMVxbSmotuWyw68ND1aDaAGC4qxrjOQ5Cfv/HfkvyxQmCt98pko2gLo aX2X0l69kZF+SFVSqg2A==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j7iTT-0001FB-3z; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 16:26:51 +0000 Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com ([185.176.76.210] helo=huawei.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j7iTP-0001D6-IM for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 16:26:49 +0000 Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 0714367CCA21321329BA; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 16:26:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 16:26:40 +0000 Received: from localhost (10.202.226.57) by lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 16:26:40 +0000 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 16:26:37 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Jean-Philippe Brucker Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/26] iommu/sva: Manage process address spaces Message-ID: <20200228162637.00007f4c@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20200228144304.GC2156@myrica> References: <20200224182401.353359-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org> <20200224182401.353359-3-jean-philippe@linaro.org> <20200226123506.000076fb@Huawei.com> <20200228144304.GC2156@myrica> Organization: Huawei Technologies Research and Development (UK) Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; i686-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.202.226.57] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml727-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.78) To lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200228_082647_911218_DE6FDE5E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 28.72 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kevin.tian@intel.com, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, Jean-Philippe Brucker , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, yi.l.liu@intel.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, zhangfei.gao@linaro.org, will@kernel.org, christian.koenig@amd.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 15:43:04 +0100 Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:35:06PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > + * A single Process Address Space ID (PASID) is allocated for each mm. In the > > > + * example, devices use PASID 1 to read/write into address space X and PASID 2 > > > + * to read/write into address space Y. Calling iommu_sva_get_pasid() on bond 1 > > > + * returns 1, and calling it on bonds 2-4 returns 2. > > > + * > > > + * Hardware tables describing this configuration in the IOMMU would typically > > > + * look like this: > > > + * > > > + * PASID tables > > > + * of domain A > > > + * .->+--------+ > > > + * / 0 | |-------> io_pgtable > > > + * / +--------+ > > > + * Device tables / 1 | |-------> pgd X > > > + * +--------+ / +--------+ > > > + * 00:00.0 | A |-' 2 | |--. > > > + * +--------+ +--------+ \ > > > + * : : 3 | | \ > > > + * +--------+ +--------+ --> pgd Y > > > + * 00:01.0 | B |--. / > > > + * +--------+ \ | > > > + * 00:01.1 | B |----+ PASID tables | > > > + * +--------+ \ of domain B | > > > + * '->+--------+ | > > > + * 0 | |-- | --> io_pgtable > > > + * +--------+ | > > > + * 1 | | | > > > + * +--------+ | > > > + * 2 | |---' > > > + * +--------+ > > > + * 3 | | > > > + * +--------+ > > > + * > > > + * With this model, a single call binds all devices in a given domain to an > > > + * address space. Other devices in the domain will get the same bond implicitly. > > > + * However, users must issue one bind() for each device, because IOMMUs may > > > + * implement SVA differently. Furthermore, mandating one bind() per device > > > + * allows the driver to perform sanity-checks on device capabilities. > > > > > + * > > > + * In some IOMMUs, one entry of the PASID table (typically the first one) can > > > + * hold non-PASID translations. In this case PASID 0 is reserved and the first > > > + * entry points to the io_pgtable pointer. In other IOMMUs the io_pgtable > > > + * pointer is held in the device table and PASID 0 is available to the > > > + * allocator. > > > > Is it worth hammering home in here that we can only do this because the PASID space > > is global (with exception of PASID 0)? It's a convenient simplification but not > > necessarily a hardware restriction so perhaps we should remind people somewhere in here? > > I could add this four paragraphs up: > > "A single Process Address Space ID (PASID) is allocated for each mm. It is > a choice made for the Linux SVA implementation, not a hardware > restriction." Perfect. > > > > + */ > > > + > > > +struct io_mm { > > > + struct list_head devices; > > > + struct mm_struct *mm; > > > + struct mmu_notifier notifier; > > > + > > > + /* Late initialization */ > > > + const struct io_mm_ops *ops; > > > + void *ctx; > > > + int pasid; > > > +}; > > > + > > > +#define to_io_mm(mmu_notifier) container_of(mmu_notifier, struct io_mm, notifier) > > > +#define to_iommu_bond(handle) container_of(handle, struct iommu_bond, sva) > > > > Code ordering wise, do we want this after the definition of iommu_bond? > > > > For both of these it's a bit non obvious what they come 'from'. > > I wouldn't naturally assume to_io_mm gets me from notifier to the io_mm > > for example. Not sure it matters though if these are only used in a few > > places. > > Right, I can rename the first one to mn_to_io_mm(). The second one I think > might be good enough. Agreed. The second one does feel more natural. > > > > > +static struct iommu_sva * > > > +io_mm_attach(struct device *dev, struct io_mm *io_mm, void *drvdata) > > > +{ > > > + int ret = 0; > > > > I'm fairly sure this is set in all paths below. Now, of course the > > compiler might not think that in which case fair enough :) > > > > > + bool attach_domain = true; > > > + struct iommu_bond *bond, *tmp; > > > + struct iommu_domain *domain, *other; > > > + struct iommu_sva_param *param = dev->iommu_param->sva_param; > > > + > > > + domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(dev); > > > + > > > + bond = kzalloc(sizeof(*bond), GFP_KERNEL); > > > + if (!bond) > > > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > > > + > > > + bond->sva.dev = dev; > > > + bond->drvdata = drvdata; > > > + refcount_set(&bond->refs, 1); > > > + RCU_INIT_POINTER(bond->io_mm, io_mm); > > > + > > > + mutex_lock(&iommu_sva_lock); > > > + /* Is it already bound to the device or domain? */ > > > + list_for_each_entry(tmp, &io_mm->devices, mm_head) { > > > + if (tmp->sva.dev != dev) { > > > + other = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(tmp->sva.dev); > > > + if (domain == other) > > > + attach_domain = false; > > > + > > > + continue; > > > + } > > > + > > > + if (WARN_ON(tmp->drvdata != drvdata)) { > > > + ret = -EINVAL; > > > + goto err_free; > > > + } > > > + > > > + /* > > > + * Hold a single io_mm reference per bond. Note that we can't > > > + * return an error after this, otherwise the caller would drop > > > + * an additional reference to the io_mm. > > > + */ > > > + refcount_inc(&tmp->refs); > > > + io_mm_put(io_mm); > > > + kfree(bond); > > > > Free outside the lock would be ever so slightly more logical given we allocated > > before taking the lock. > > > > > + mutex_unlock(&iommu_sva_lock); > > > + return &tmp->sva; > > > + } > > > + > > > + list_add_rcu(&bond->mm_head, &io_mm->devices); > > > + param->nr_bonds++; > > > + mutex_unlock(&iommu_sva_lock); > > > + > > > + ret = io_mm->ops->attach(bond->sva.dev, io_mm->pasid, io_mm->ctx, > > > + attach_domain); > > > + if (ret) > > > + goto err_remove; > > > + > > > + return &bond->sva; > > > + > > > +err_remove: > > > + /* > > > + * At this point concurrent threads may have started to access the > > > + * io_mm->devices list in order to invalidate address ranges, which > > > + * requires to free the bond via kfree_rcu() > > > + */ > > > + mutex_lock(&iommu_sva_lock); > > > + param->nr_bonds--; > > > + list_del_rcu(&bond->mm_head); > > > + > > > +err_free: > > > + mutex_unlock(&iommu_sva_lock); > > > + kfree_rcu(bond, rcu_head); > > > > I don't suppose it matters really but we don't need the rcu free if > > we follow the err_free goto. Perhaps we are cleaner in this case > > to not use a unified exit path but do that case inline? > > Agreed, though I moved the kzalloc() later as suggested by Jacob, I think > it looks a little better and simplifies the error paths > > Thanks, > Jean Jonathan _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel