Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>
Cc: "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Robert Foss <robert.foss@linaro.org>,
	Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
	Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-media <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] media: dt-bindings: ov8856: Document YAML bindings
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 19:34:54 +0300
Message-ID: <20200408163454.GG3676135@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200408153051.GP6127@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk>

On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 06:30:51PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 06:28:57PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 03:43:15PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:

...

> > No sensor driver I've seen has used clk_set_rate_exclusive() but I guess
> > they should. The absence of practical problems has been probably because of
> > two factors; firstly, these are typically clocks dedicated to the sensors
> > and secondly, good luck.

As I heard in another thread clk_*_exclusive() is quite a big hammer with a lot
of side effects and if it can be avoided, it must be avoided.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply index

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-31 13:33 [PATCH v3 0/3] media: ov8856: Add devicetree support Robert Foss
2020-03-31 13:33 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] media: dt-bindings: ov8856: Document YAML bindings Robert Foss
2020-03-31 15:12   ` Marco Felsch
2020-04-02  9:57     ` Robert Foss
2020-04-03 19:21       ` Marco Felsch
2020-04-01  8:07   ` Maxime Ripard
2020-04-02 10:10     ` Robert Foss
2020-04-03 23:27       ` Sakari Ailus
2020-04-04  9:34         ` Maxime Ripard
2020-04-06  8:25           ` Robert Foss
2020-04-06  8:35           ` Sakari Ailus
2020-04-07  8:36             ` Maxime Ripard
2020-04-07 11:29               ` Robert Foss
2020-04-07 12:32                 ` Maxime Ripard
2020-04-07 15:47                   ` Robert Foss
2020-04-07 16:39                     ` Sakari Ailus
2020-04-07 16:46                       ` Tomasz Figa
2020-04-07 17:20                         ` Sakari Ailus
2020-04-08 12:21                           ` Maxime Ripard
2020-04-08 12:35                             ` Tomasz Figa
2020-04-08 13:43                               ` Maxime Ripard
2020-04-08 15:28                                 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-04-08 15:30                                   ` Sakari Ailus
2020-04-08 16:34                                     ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2020-04-15 10:18                                     ` Maxime Ripard
2020-04-15 11:10                                       ` Robert Foss
2020-04-15 16:16                                       ` Sakari Ailus
2020-04-20 15:02                                         ` Maxime Ripard
2020-04-09  8:32                                   ` Robert Foss
2020-04-07 16:20                   ` Sakari Ailus
2020-04-04  9:23       ` Maxime Ripard
2020-03-31 13:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] media: ov8856: Add devicetree support Robert Foss
2020-03-31 14:01   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-04-06 13:37     ` Robert Foss
2020-04-06 15:06       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-04-06 15:25         ` Robert Foss
2020-04-03 23:33   ` Sakari Ailus
2020-03-31 13:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] media: ov8856: Implement sensor module revision identification Robert Foss

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200408163454.GG3676135@smile.fi.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
    --cc=robert.foss@linaro.org \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
    --cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/0 linux-arm-kernel/git/0.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1 linux-arm-kernel/git/1.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-arm-kernel linux-arm-kernel/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel \
		linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
	public-inbox-index linux-arm-kernel

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git