From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9BCC2BA2B for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 06:51:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4503C20757 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 06:51:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="o/3JEECg"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="ZM3ufTJc" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4503C20757 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=KG2ZiZF0QdknMtAzIsU6Q/YsPlaLphfRKqwsGwIDiKo=; b=o/3JEECgMOGCcL jacJrgtHmzIkEQBji+jQ17q5jnmk60lWBWGGZoIcV1SU4VKtJzaTTZcSZ2zvzrOST6rXU02q66Hlb twEmru9E6n4dGJ1A06Rnxyw2F3qa4sbBiMYO3IllU+YA6qdw0/CmmQBmwJdUfoLGr+0O4YP4E6JL+ qJclUd853vaKV72pajavm37E60XzGx4gCNOCDwOKrCRbSG8W4eFCBqH3bCQMPRSQ/QTLBS+ZhNfWR oxV3zlqXPWHakA4Vvfk4r1RYgivNhyu96FFUd/3eethq618gIuKdqugVFcgFYrkd8BqpmWEqv9pd3 /JQ4KeD+gthV+3dAl8qg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jMnVE-00017b-Cm; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 06:51:00 +0000 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61] helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jMnVA-00016Q-Hh for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 06:50:58 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1586501453; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=g9JE7+kQcGRHuqYE15Qj2LdCxQJFZbqVW19T+MEzEiw=; b=ZM3ufTJc0Qqpm9Pdq9U6WBlEiq3wrtYIlqjPua67yQdOSgrqMRWfs08mxcU2fdsqUlhwdk sdalJKMxLWT/3Wf+bz4mrmsWGBLQcfPVb/qZOX8rGL/2Vprg0XWnhtgjgGM85gVsBgDlei s/v9m0swT/sQSSCOD7cCOqNOfMYarQc= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-116-YFk-c_hfPIunR-iCRoa7nA-1; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 02:50:47 -0400 X-MC-Unique: YFk-c_hfPIunR-iCRoa7nA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACA40107B275; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 06:50:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-13-236.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.13.236]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E95605DA7C; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 06:50:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 14:50:39 +0800 From: Baoquan He To: Mike Rapoport Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] mm: Enable CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES by default for NUMA Message-ID: <20200410065039.GG2129@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> References: <1585420282-25630-1-git-send-email-Hoan@os.amperecomputing.com> <20200330074246.GA14243@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200330175100.GD30942@linux.ibm.com> <20200330182301.GM14243@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200331081423.GE30942@linux.ibm.com> <20200331085513.GE30449@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200331140332.GA2129@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> <20200331142138.GL30449@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200409162741.GA9387@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200409162741.GA9387@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200409_235056_659634_67CF6858 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 31.73 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: mmorana@amperecomputing.com, Catalin Marinas , Heiko Carstens , Michal Hocko , "open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" , Paul Mackerras , "H. Peter Anvin" , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Duyck , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Michael Ellerman , x86@kernel.org, Christian Borntraeger , Ingo Molnar , Hoan Tran , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Pavel Tatashin , lho@amperecomputing.com, Vasily Gorbik , Vlastimil Babka , Will Deacon , Borislav Petkov , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Oscar Salvador , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 04/09/20 at 07:27pm, Mike Rapoport wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 04:21:38PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Tue 31-03-20 22:03:32, Baoquan He wrote: > > > Hi Michal, > > > > > > On 03/31/20 at 10:55am, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > On Tue 31-03-20 11:14:23, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > > > Maybe I mis-read the code, but I don't see how this could happen. In the > > > > > HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP=y case, free_area_init_node() calls > > > > > calculate_node_totalpages() that ensures that node->node_zones are entirely > > > > > within the node because this is checked in zone_spanned_pages_in_node(). > > > > > > > > zone_spanned_pages_in_node does chech the zone boundaries are within the > > > > node boundaries. But that doesn't really tell anything about other > > > > potential zones interleaving with the physical memory range. > > > > zone->spanned_pages simply gives the physical range for the zone > > > > including holes. Interleaving nodes are essentially a hole > > > > (__absent_pages_in_range is going to skip those). > > > > > > > > That means that when free_area_init_core simply goes over the whole > > > > physical zone range including holes and that is why we need to check > > > > both for physical and logical holes (aka other nodes). > > > > > > > > The life would be so much easier if the whole thing would simply iterate > > > > over memblocks... > > > > > > The memblock iterating sounds a great idea. I tried with putting the > > > memblock iterating in the upper layer, memmap_init(), which is used for > > > boot mem only anyway. Do you think it's doable and OK? It yes, I can > > > work out a formal patch to make this simpler as you said. The draft code > > > is as below. Like this it uses the existing code and involves little change. > > > > Doing this would be a step in the right direction! I haven't checked the > > code very closely though. The below sounds way too simple to be truth I > > am afraid. First for_each_mem_pfn_range is available only for > > CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP (which is one of the reasons why I keep > > saying that I really hate that being conditional). Also I haven't really > > checked the deferred initialization path - I have a very vague > > recollection that it has been converted to the memblock api but I have > > happilly dropped all that memory. > > The Baoquan's patch almost did it, at least for simple case of qemu with 2 > nodes. It's only missing the adjustment to the size passed to > memmap_init_zone() as it may change because of clamping. Right, the size need be adjusted after start and end clamping. > > I've drafted something that removes HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP and added this > patch there [1]. For several memory configurations I could emulate with > qemu it worked. > I'm going to wait a bit to see of kbuild is happy and then I'll send the > patches. > > Baoquan, I took liberty to add your SoB, hope you don't mind. > > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/linux.git/log/?h=memblock/all-have-node-map Of course not. Thanks for doing this, and look forward to seeing your formal patchset posting when it's ready. > > > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > > > index 138a56c0f48f..558d421f294b 100644 > > > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > > > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > > > @@ -6007,14 +6007,6 @@ void __meminit memmap_init_zone(unsigned long size, int nid, unsigned long zone, > > > * function. They do not exist on hotplugged memory. > > > */ > > > if (context == MEMMAP_EARLY) { > > > - if (!early_pfn_valid(pfn)) { > > > - pfn = next_pfn(pfn); > > > - continue; > > > - } > > > - if (!early_pfn_in_nid(pfn, nid)) { > > > - pfn++; > > > - continue; > > > - } > > > if (overlap_memmap_init(zone, &pfn)) > > > continue; > > > if (defer_init(nid, pfn, end_pfn)) > > > @@ -6130,9 +6122,17 @@ static void __meminit zone_init_free_lists(struct zone *zone) > > > } > > > > > > void __meminit __weak memmap_init(unsigned long size, int nid, > > > - unsigned long zone, unsigned long start_pfn) > > > + unsigned long zone, unsigned long range_start_pfn) > > > { > > > - memmap_init_zone(size, nid, zone, start_pfn, MEMMAP_EARLY, NULL); > > > + unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn; > > > + unsigned long range_end_pfn = range_start_pfn + size; > > > + int i; > > > + for_each_mem_pfn_range(i, nid, &start_pfn, &end_pfn, NULL) { > > > + start_pfn = clamp(start_pfn, range_start_pfn, range_end_pfn); > > > + end_pfn = clamp(end_pfn, range_start_pfn, range_end_pfn); > > > + if (end_pfn > start_pfn) > > > + memmap_init_zone(size, nid, zone, start_pfn, MEMMAP_EARLY, NULL); > > > + } > > > } > > > > > > static int zone_batchsize(struct zone *zone) > > > > -- > > Michal Hocko > > SUSE Labs > > -- > Sincerely yours, > Mike. > > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel