Hi Nicolas,

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 01:24:14PM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
> 
> On Fri, 2020-04-24 at 17:33 +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > The firmware clocks driver was previously probed through a platform_device
> > created by the firmware driver.
> > 
> > Since we will now have a node for that clocks driver, we need to create the
> > device only in the case where there's no node for it already.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
> > ---
> >  drivers/firmware/raspberrypi.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/raspberrypi.c b/drivers/firmware/raspberrypi.c
> > index da26a584dca0..1874f41b007c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/raspberrypi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/raspberrypi.c
> > @@ -210,6 +210,15 @@ rpi_register_hwmon_driver(struct device *dev, struct
> > rpi_firmware *fw)
> >  
> >  static void rpi_register_clk_driver(struct device *dev)
> >  {
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Earlier DTs don't have a node for the firmware clocks but
> > +	 * rely on us creating a platform device by hand. If we do
> > +	 * have a node for the firmware clocks, just bail out here.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (of_get_compatible_child(dev->of_node,
> > +				    "raspberrypi,firmware-clocks"))
> > +		return;
> > +
> >  	rpi_clk = platform_device_register_data(dev, "raspberrypi-clk",
> >  						-1, NULL, 0);
> >  }
> > @@ -262,8 +271,12 @@ static int rpi_firmware_remove(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> >  
> >  	platform_device_unregister(rpi_hwmon);
> >  	rpi_hwmon = NULL;
> > -	platform_device_unregister(rpi_clk);
> > -	rpi_clk = NULL;
> > +
> > +	if (rpi_clk) {
> 
> rpi_clk, being a static global variable, will be zeroed by default. So, if you
> don't register the platform device, rpi_clk is going to be NULL, which you're
> allowed to feed platform_device_unregister(), so no need to be extra careful.

Indeed, I'll fix that up.

Thanks!
Maxime