From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BCE8C38A24 for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 11:45:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F07D20735 for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 11:45:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="ctmXjOyH" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3F07D20735 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=vivo.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To :From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: List-Owner; bh=5G/Lbra1QR79BwYNbWL0Ge1AnnG5+kcZ/EafStgySsc=; b=ctmXjOyHwvdAfv wlMu7vOTFjeEhqsB6qMyb6wQgNqeOKo57IW4Yrk3tlJVlQHsSDaV1q8qpzzvZQrT2O5CQN+GzuLK9 leW19sSlbUNB7mfYBSLyWizQsSg6WO0foflhVIdX+zRfX//Ux4R+ukiUF1A58zG0pDiThJI0mTYX2 gO5MSook8DL/DHZ4WipTiDDuTAV/hpBBs1zHq4Af0uzQEYR1e5iN55yJb/o90A2+GYE2DzybbLXkq 3bfpskkQCYfra8gE5ED/zMYw6vuW0dVomxXQbEhMigb859MEF9N2Q0FOrXpubg+a9goDad6B8zxOw n3nKqcb93lzA4SSuOZBw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jWeyD-0003iE-AT; Thu, 07 May 2020 11:45:41 +0000 Received: from mail-m17613.qiye.163.com ([59.111.176.13]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jWey9-0003h1-Dg for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 07 May 2020 11:45:39 +0000 Received: from ubuntu.localdomain (unknown [157.0.31.122]) by mail-m17613.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTPA id 2BEEA482B3F; Thu, 7 May 2020 19:45:22 +0800 (CST) From: Bernard Zhao To: Lukasz Luba , Kukjin Kim , Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] memory/samsung: Maybe wrong triming parameter Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 04:45:14 -0700 Message-Id: <20200507114514.11589-1-bernard@vivo.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUtXWQgYFAkeWUFZT1VOS0JCQkJMTklLT09NQ1lXWShZQU hPN1dZLVlBSVdZCQ4XHghZQVk1NCk2OjckKS43PlkG X-HM-Sender-Digest: e1kMHhlZQR0aFwgeV1kSHx4VD1lBWUc6Pgg6Gjo5NTg0GT8wSyNCHzMv IkwwCRJVSlVKTkNDQ05KQkhISkxJVTMWGhIXVRkeCRUaCR87DRINFFUYFBZFWVdZEgtZQVlKTkxV S1VISlVKSUlZV1kIAVlBSUtMTDcG X-HM-Tid: 0a71eef455f993bakuws2beea482b3f X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200507_044537_652703_819881C2 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.22 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: opensource.kernel@vivo.com, Bernard Zhao Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org In function create_timings_aligned, all the max is to use dmc->min_tck->xxx, aligned with val dmc->timings->xxx. But the dmc->timings->tFAW use dmc->min_tck->tXP? Maybe this point is wrong parameter useing. Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao --- drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c b/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c index 81a1b1d01683..22a43d662833 100644 --- a/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c +++ b/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c @@ -1091,7 +1091,7 @@ static int create_timings_aligned(struct exynos5_dmc *dmc, u32 *reg_timing_row, /* power related timings */ val = dmc->timings->tFAW / clk_period_ps; val += dmc->timings->tFAW % clk_period_ps ? 1 : 0; - val = max(val, dmc->min_tck->tXP); + val = max(val, dmc->min_tck->tFAW); reg = &timing_power[0]; *reg_timing_power |= TIMING_VAL2REG(reg, val); -- 2.26.2 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel