From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA3FC433E0 for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 11:19:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBE10207D3 for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 11:19:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="LKY01OWC"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="b/Rf6crt" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EBE10207D3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=armlinux.org.uk Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=CUCfc+Q2LsjMTDXx8SL7ZhxkNQYljQgaKXWqd51aFRM=; b=LKY01OWCHEwhTM itkNxAh9pWlmNdz2w4w2D8nOuw78Hm09s800LpTggpJ13/KF59Sg6wwO/iy9LwPUKI05IKv1Lz/gi MuT+UcOTS/z0T2Rxr+KrwpVS9MO8iFcDqohPUHhM4MNX49aB29DtHCPLxsRo4ARYDeqzsMAEEn71+ gnDOsuNpTpcntPqBBNJNF3W0x8zScaC6OS4yfezKaL5Bsq6N2ukpP0dfwhCP3L1ynfZgsYzuD3U7R opnx4wbDijtllsZp/iuvRlgDCy1RdNJtcY7UrdTMJ93ObCTP4xuk9mOTgCYEaOeCG9dFip9Ibrq93 XnzFAVozhSXDk/rFGUEw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jbMkq-0000ql-G4; Wed, 20 May 2020 11:19:20 +0000 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([2001:4d48:ad52:3201:214:fdff:fe10:1be6]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jbMkn-0000pu-TX for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 20 May 2020 11:19:19 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=hhlHkN1kByydnEQWyR3TLw/SDjYVkMwsfp32OLQh57w=; b=b/Rf6crtBrbP3SO1KMLW4j7P/ 1ln9lmZQherbT15oFm9GwUfUPH3isrOQ4HyLxU1wMNPn8+43TkHLHEeH7NQqeHrpdJ8VojCBHhto3 XIE8bNbe4K6YTdOJoMlK8L1HdHHgTEn9B0/dBtfVegdyXahpN0ftWujW8vFNCwI+DbwNUjpgM1OpU LJRQYXgkrgGDeObQuTNmtgupE+VyR6nLsj7e2ip0Ryb0vQEgRjT8o/u4ESl/CJJPKwmiq9rA0OKTy yyuYLe7PvoDB8ta97fOOoZqBBWphzDAEy3duy7tY2mTfEnFHsgN6QBPfnfQFqC0rwNynHIwsIPGOu m3fISKySw==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([fd8f:7570:feb6:1:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:34586) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbMkO-00085W-2L; Wed, 20 May 2020 12:18:52 +0100 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jbMkM-0006m8-DD; Wed, 20 May 2020 12:18:50 +0100 Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 12:18:50 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin To: Matteo Croce Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: mvpp2: cls: Use RSS contexts to handle RSS tables Message-ID: <20200520111850.GL1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20200509114518.GB1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200509195246.GJ1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200509202050.GK1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200519095330.GA1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200519190534.78bb8389@turbo.teknoraver.net> <20200520111043.GK1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200520_041917_952817_95A812D9 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.11 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Antoine Tenart , netdev , "gregory.clement@bootlin.com" , LKML , Maxime Chevallier , Nadav Haklai , Thomas Petazzoni , "miquel.raynal@bootlin.com" , Stefan Chulski , Marcin Wojtas , "David S . Miller" , Linux ARM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 01:16:25PM +0200, Matteo Croce wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 1:11 PM Russell King - ARM Linux admin > wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 07:05:34PM +0200, Matteo Croce wrote: > > > On Tue, 19 May 2020 12:05:20 +0200 > > > Matteo Croce wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > The patch seems to work. I'm generating traffic with random MAC and IP > > > addresses, to have many flows: > > > > > > # tcpdump -tenni eth2 > > > 9a:a9:b1:3a:b1:6b > 00:51:82:11:22:02, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 60: 10.0.0.4.0 > 192.168.0.4.0: UDP, length 12 > > > 9e:92:fd:f8:7f:0a > 00:51:82:11:22:02, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 60: 10.0.0.4.0 > 192.168.0.4.0: UDP, length 12 > > > 66:b7:11:8a:c2:1f > 00:51:82:11:22:02, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 60: 10.0.0.1.0 > 192.168.0.1.0: UDP, length 12 > > > 7a:ba:58:bd:9a:62 > 00:51:82:11:22:02, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 60: 10.0.0.1.0 > 192.168.0.1.0: UDP, length 12 > > > 7e:78:a9:97:70:3a > 00:51:82:11:22:02, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 60: 10.0.0.2.0 > 192.168.0.2.0: UDP, length 12 > > > b2:81:91:34:ce:42 > 00:51:82:11:22:02, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 60: 10.0.0.2.0 > 192.168.0.2.0: UDP, length 12 > > > 2a:05:52:d0:d9:3f > 00:51:82:11:22:02, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 60: 10.0.0.3.0 > 192.168.0.3.0: UDP, length 12 > > > ee:ee:47:35:fa:81 > 00:51:82:11:22:02, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 60: 10.0.0.3.0 > 192.168.0.3.0: UDP, length 12 > > > > > > This is the default rate, with rxhash off: > > > > > > # utraf eth2 > > > tx: 0 bps 0 pps rx: 397.4 Mbps 827.9 Kpps > > > tx: 0 bps 0 pps rx: 396.3 Mbps 825.7 Kpps > > > tx: 0 bps 0 pps rx: 396.6 Mbps 826.3 Kpps > > > tx: 0 bps 0 pps rx: 396.5 Mbps 826.1 Kpps > > > > > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > > > 9 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 99.7 0.0 7:02.58 ksoftirqd/0 > > > 15 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/1 > > > 20 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 2:01.48 ksoftirqd/2 > > > 25 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:32.86 ksoftirqd/3 > > > > > > and this with rx hashing enabled: > > > > > > # ethtool -K eth2 rxhash on > > > # utraf eth2 > > > tx: 0 bps 0 pps rx: 456.4 Mbps 950.8 Kpps > > > tx: 0 bps 0 pps rx: 458.4 Mbps 955.0 Kpps > > > tx: 0 bps 0 pps rx: 457.6 Mbps 953.3 Kpps > > > tx: 0 bps 0 pps rx: 462.2 Mbps 962.9 Kpps > > > > > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > > > 20 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 0.7 0.0 2:02.34 ksoftirqd/2 > > > 25 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.3 0.0 0:33.25 ksoftirqd/3 > > > 9 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 7:52.57 ksoftirqd/0 > > > 15 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/1 > > > > > > > > > The throughput doesn't increase so much, maybe we hit an HW limit of > > > the gigabit port. The interesting thing is how the global CPU usage > > > drops from 25% to 1%. > > > I can't explain this, it could be due to the reduced contention? > > > > Hi Matteo, > > > > Can I take that as a Tested-by ? > > > > Thanks. > > > > -- > > RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ > > FTTC for 0.8m (est. 1762m) line in suburbia: sync at 13.1Mbps down 424kbps up > > > > Tested-by: Matteo Croce > > probably also: > > Reported-by: Matteo Croce Thanks! -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC for 0.8m (est. 1762m) line in suburbia: sync at 13.1Mbps down 424kbps up _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel