linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Luis Machado <luis.machado@linaro.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, Keno Fischer <keno@juliacomputing.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/7] arm64: Fix single-step handling and syscall tracing
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 14:06:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200710130702.30658-1-will@kernel.org> (raw)

Hi folks,

This is version three of the patches I previous posted here:

  v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200603151033.11512-1-will@kernel.org
  v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200702212618.17800-1-will@kernel.org

This version includes some changes I've been hacking on in relation to
syscall entry/exit, as it seemed worth lumping all this together. I've
also reordered the series to put the fixes at the start.

Luis -- did you manage to test v2? I'd quite like to queue some of this
soon. If you don't have time, how can I run the GDB testsuite myself? I
tried doing it a _long_ time ago but I remember there being a lot of
failures and flakey tests, so it wasn't very helpful. I have arm64
hardware running Debian so it's just a question of which buttons to
press :)

Cheers,

Will

Cc: <kernel-team@android.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Luis Machado <luis.machado@linaro.org>
Cc: Keno Fischer <keno@juliacomputing.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

--->8

Will Deacon (7):
  arm64: ptrace: Consistently use pseudo-singlestep exceptions
  arm64: ptrace: Override SPSR.SS when single-stepping is enabled
  arm64: compat: Ensure upper 32 bits of x0 are zero on syscall return
  arm64: ptrace: Add a comment describing our syscall entry/exit trap
    ABI
  arm64: syscall: Expand the comment about ptrace and syscall(-1)
  arm64: ptrace: Use NO_SYSCALL instead of -1 in syscall_trace_enter()
  arm64: Use test_tsk_thread_flag() for checking TIF_SINGLESTEP

 arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h |  2 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h        | 12 +++++-
 arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h    |  1 +
 arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c      | 24 +++++++++---
 arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c              | 49 +++++++++++++++++++------
 arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c              | 11 +-----
 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c             | 21 ++++++++++-
 7 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

-- 
2.27.0.383.g050319c2ae-goog


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

             reply	other threads:[~2020-07-10 13:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-10 13:06 Will Deacon [this message]
2020-07-10 13:06 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] arm64: ptrace: Consistently use pseudo-singlestep exceptions Will Deacon
2020-07-16  0:27   ` Sasha Levin
2020-07-10 13:06 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] arm64: ptrace: Override SPSR.SS when single-stepping is enabled Will Deacon
2020-07-16  0:27   ` Sasha Levin
2020-07-10 13:06 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] arm64: compat: Ensure upper 32 bits of x0 are zero on syscall return Will Deacon
2020-07-16  0:27   ` Sasha Levin
2020-07-10 13:06 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] arm64: ptrace: Add a comment describing our syscall entry/exit trap ABI Will Deacon
2020-07-10 13:07 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] arm64: syscall: Expand the comment about ptrace and syscall(-1) Will Deacon
2020-07-10 13:07 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] arm64: ptrace: Use NO_SYSCALL instead of -1 in syscall_trace_enter() Will Deacon
2020-07-10 16:04   ` Kees Cook
2020-07-10 16:11     ` Will Deacon
2020-07-13  2:32       ` Kees Cook
2020-07-10 13:07 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: Use test_tsk_thread_flag() for checking TIF_SINGLESTEP Will Deacon
2020-07-14 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] arm64: Fix single-step handling and syscall tracing Luis Machado
2020-07-15 12:25 ` Luis Machado

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200710130702.30658-1-will@kernel.org \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=keno@juliacomputing.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=luis.machado@linaro.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).