linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
	Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] phy: armada-38x: fix NETA lockup when repeatedly switching speeds
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 18:21:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200713172140.GT1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87365v5svd.fsf@FE-laptop>

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 05:36:54PM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> > On 10-07-20, 16:19, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 12:27:27PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> >> > On 30-06-20, 17:05, Russell King wrote:
> >> > > The mvneta hardware appears to lock up in various random ways when
> >> > > repeatedly switching speeds between 1G and 2.5G, which involves
> >> > > reprogramming the COMPHY.  It is not entirely clear why this happens,
> >> > > but best guess is that reprogramming the COMPHY glitches mvneta clocks
> >> > > causing the hardware to fail.  It seems that rebooting resolves the
> >> > > failure, but not down/up cycling the interface alone.
> >> > > 
> >> > > Various other approaches have been tried, such as trying to cleanly
> >> > > power down the COMPHY and then take it back through the power up
> >> > > initialisation, but this does not seem to help.
> >> > > 
> >> > > It was finally noticed that u-boot's last step when configuring a
> >> > > COMPHY for "SGMII" mode was to poke at a register described as
> >> > > "GBE_CONFIGURATION_REG", which is undocumented in any external
> >> > > documentation.  All that we have is the fact that u-boot sets a bit
> >> > > corresponding to the "SGMII" lane at the end of COMPHY initialisation.
> >> > > 
> >> > > Experimentation shows that if we clear this bit prior to changing the
> >> > > speed, and then set it afterwards, mvneta does not suffer this problem
> >> > > on the SolidRun Clearfog when switching speeds between 1G and 2.5G.
> >> > > 
> >> > > This problem was found while script-testing phylink.
> >> > > 
> >> > > Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
> >> > > ---
> >> > >  arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-38x.dtsi          |  3 +-
> >> > 
> >> > lgtm, i need ack for dts parts before I can apply this
> >> 
> >> I'm not sure what the situation is for Bootlin, but they don't seem to
> >> be very responsive right now (covid related?)
> >> 
> >> What I know from what I've been party to on netdev is that Bootlin
> >> sent a patch for the MVPP2 driver, and the very next day someone
> >> reported that the patch caused a bug.  Unfortunately, the patch got
> >> picked up anyway, but there was no response from Bootlin.  After a
> >> month or so, -final was released containing this patch, so now it
> >> had become a regression - and still no response from Bootlin.
> >> 
> >> Eventually the bug got fixed - not because Bootlin fixed it, but
> >> because I ended up spending the time researching how that part of
> >> the network driver worked, diagnosing what was going on, and
> >> eventually fixing it in the most obvious way - but it's not clear
> >> that the fix was the right approach.  Bootlin never commented.  See
> >> 3138a07ce219 ("net: mvpp2: fix RX hashing for non-10G ports").
> >> 
> >> So, I think we have to assume that Bootlin are struggling right now,
> >> and as it's been over a week, it's unlikely that they are going to
> >> respond soon.  What do you think we should do?
> >> 
> >> I also note that Rob has not responded to the DT binding change
> >> either, despite me gently prodding, and Rob processing a whole raft
> >> of DT binding stuff yesterday.
> >> 
> >> I can split the DTS change from the rest of the patch, but I don't
> >> think that really helps without at least the binding change being
> >> agreed.
> >
> > I would prefer splitting, you may sent the DTS to arm arch folks if no
> > response from subarch folks
> 
> Yes please could you split the patch to put the dts apart ? And if the
> binding is accepted we will apply it.

I don't see any sign that Rob will ever review the DTS part, so I'm
at the point of just not caring about this anymore. I will carry it
in my tree, but I'm going to do nothing further.

That means that switching speed on mvneta on the Armada 38x is can
cause the network to die, but hey, if people can't be bothered to
review, and wish to impose rules such as "you can't change anything
with DT without my express say so" which have the effect of blocking
fixes, that's really not my problem.

So, shrug, I'm giving up with these patches.  Sorry.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-13 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-30 16:04 [PATCH 0/2] Fix Armada 38x mvneta lockups when switching speeds Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-30 16:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt: update Marvell Armada 38x COMPHY binding Russell King
2020-07-09 10:28   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-07-15 20:33   ` Rob Herring
2020-06-30 16:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] phy: armada-38x: fix NETA lockup when repeatedly switching speeds Russell King
2020-06-30 16:06   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-07-01  6:57   ` Vinod Koul
2020-07-10 15:19     ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-07-13  6:18       ` Vinod Koul
2020-07-13 15:36         ` Gregory CLEMENT
2020-07-13 17:21           ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2020-07-13 18:07             ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-07-16  5:46               ` Vinod Koul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200713172140.GT1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).