linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>,
	"Ben Dooks (Codethink)" <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>,
	"Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@linutronix.de>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/6] arm64: perf: Add cap_user_time_short
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 10:05:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200715020512.20991-6-leo.yan@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200715020512.20991-1-leo.yan@linaro.org>

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

This completes the ARM64 cap_user_time support.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
index 76f6afd28b48..1e0f15305f67 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -1174,6 +1174,7 @@ void arch_perf_update_userpage(struct perf_event *event,
 
 	userpg->cap_user_time = 0;
 	userpg->cap_user_time_zero = 0;
+	userpg->cap_user_time_short = 0;
 
 	do {
 		rd = sched_clock_read_begin(&seq);
@@ -1184,13 +1185,13 @@ void arch_perf_update_userpage(struct perf_event *event,
 		userpg->time_mult = rd->mult;
 		userpg->time_shift = rd->shift;
 		userpg->time_zero = rd->epoch_ns;
+		userpg->time_cycles = rd->epoch_cyc;
+		userpg->time_mask = rd->sched_clock_mask;
 
 		/*
-		 * This isn't strictly correct, the ARM64 counter can be
-		 * 'short' and then we get funnies when it wraps. The correct
-		 * thing would be to extend the perf ABI with a cycle and mask
-		 * value, but because wrapping on ARM64 is very rare in
-		 * practise this 'works'.
+		 * Subtract the cycle base, such that software that
+		 * doesn't know about cap_user_time_short still 'works'
+		 * assuming no wraps.
 		 */
 		quot = rd->epoch_cyc >> rd->shift;
 		rem = rd->epoch_cyc & (((u64)1 << rd->shift) - 1);
@@ -1218,4 +1219,5 @@ void arch_perf_update_userpage(struct perf_event *event,
 	 */
 	userpg->cap_user_time = 1;
 	userpg->cap_user_time_zero = 1;
+	userpg->cap_user_time_short = 1;
 }
-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-15  2:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-15  2:05 [PATCH v2 0/6] arm64: perf: Proper cap_user_time* support Leo Yan
2020-07-15  2:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] sched_clock: Expose struct clock_read_data Leo Yan
2020-07-15  5:56   ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-07-15  6:54     ` Leo Yan
2020-07-15  7:21       ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-07-15  8:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-15  8:14       ` peterz
2020-07-15  9:23         ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-07-15  9:52           ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-15  2:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] arm64: perf: Implement correct cap_user_time Leo Yan
2020-07-15  8:38   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-15 15:39     ` Leo Yan
2020-07-15  2:05 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] arm64: perf: Only advertise cap_user_time for arch_timer Leo Yan
2020-07-15  2:05 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] perf: Add perf_event_mmap_page::cap_user_time_short ABI Leo Yan
2020-07-15  2:05 ` Leo Yan [this message]
2020-07-15  2:05 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] tools headers UAPI: Update tools's copy of linux/perf_event.h Leo Yan
2020-07-15  5:17 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] arm64: perf: Proper cap_user_time* support Ahmed S. Darwish
2020-07-15  6:29   ` Leo Yan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200715020512.20991-6-leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --to=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=a.darwish@linutronix.de \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@crapouillou.net \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).