From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A273C433E3 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 09:40:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E71B92077D for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 09:40:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="FuvLocBs" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E71B92077D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To: From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=XCPDr/BZCVb0DpKKph75EUouMh1swmjn8wRAwYjTl6I=; b=FuvLocBsaM+lmpJihc7rd5cK2h ypp7l8DyrV2Fe9E8oiFzVVGmMaG4SU1cCl6crSv0LXg2DRLsB08j4zhjUKcmwNuT2VAvgwlNxJY8A 958p96Dr+X7f0c1unArDy9siCGdQtBvwuYZ+BHXcRAZo3Gamrivf9IlT+IHiqL2Jv/CLYxKgsbFjr iJIfaitzU8wTzPJpJFaYtHoGT6kETg3+9xPV6RObCzV2MYGc0wAoNVvHzJKYJrzmkitZ3qvr7MwNj zAxR4ZywRJXI4KdJzp9Xg63sTHtMwMazTfp3cNgNLR9yu3gswgj8IoBFW8YzSsNCnhjPElI6C72yu 2MWVqZuA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jyBCv-00042y-2K; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 09:38:37 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jyBCr-0003tI-6J for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 09:38:34 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B75D101E; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 02:38:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e108754-lin.cambridge.arm.com (unknown [10.1.198.53]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 826863F66F; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 02:38:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Ionela Voinescu To: rjw@rjwysocki.net, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, will@kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] cpufreq: move invariance setter calls in cpufreq core Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:37:26 +0100 Message-Id: <20200722093732.14297-2-ionela.voinescu@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200722093732.14297-1-ionela.voinescu@arm.com> References: <20200722093732.14297-1-ionela.voinescu@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200722_053833_362105_9F643F33 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 22.19 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, ionela.voinescu@arm.com, Valentin Schneider , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Valentin Schneider To properly scale its per-entity load-tracking signals, the task scheduler needs to be given a frequency scale factor, i.e. some image of the current frequency the CPU is running at. Currently, this scale can be computed either by using counters (APERF/MPERF on x86, AMU on arm64), or by piggy-backing on the frequency selection done by cpufreq. For the latter, drivers have to explicitly set the scale factor themselves, despite it being purely boiler-plate code: the required information depends entirely on the kind of frequency switch callback implemented by the driver, i.e. either of: target_index(), target(), fast_switch() and setpolicy(). The fitness of those callbacks with regard to driving the Frequency Invariance Engine (FIE) is studied below: target_index() ============== Documentation states that the chosen frequency "must be determined by freq_table[index].frequency". It isn't clear if it *has* to be that frequency, or if it can use that frequency value to do some computation that ultimately leads to a different frequency selection. All drivers go for the former, while the vexpress-spc-cpufreq has an atypical implementation which is handled separately. Therefore, the hook works on the assumption the core can use freq_table[index].frequency. target() ======= This has been flagged as deprecated since: commit 9c0ebcf78fde ("cpufreq: Implement light weight ->target_index() routine") It also doesn't have that many users: cpufreq-nforce2.c:371:2: .target = nforce2_target, cppc_cpufreq.c:416:2: .target = cppc_cpufreq_set_target, gx-suspmod.c:439:2: .target = cpufreq_gx_target, pcc-cpufreq.c:573:2: .target = pcc_cpufreq_target, Should we care about drivers using this hook, we may be able to exploit cpufreq_freq_transition_{being, end}(). This is handled in a separate patch. fast_switch() ============= This callback *has* to return the frequency that was selected. setpolicy() =========== This callback does not have any designated way of informing what was the end choice. But there are only two drivers using setpolicy(), and none of them have current FIE support: drivers/cpufreq/longrun.c:281: .setpolicy = longrun_set_policy, drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:2215: .setpolicy = intel_pstate_set_policy, The intel_pstate is known to use counter-driven frequency invariance. Conclusion ========== Given that the significant majority of current FIE enabled drivers use callbacks that lend themselves to triggering the setting of the FIE scale factor in a generic way, move the invariance setter calls to cpufreq core. As a result of setting the frequency scale factor in cpufreq core, after callbacks that lend themselves to trigger it, remove this functionality from the driver side. To be noted that despite marking a successful frequency change, many cpufreq drivers will consider the new frequency as the requested frequency, although this is might not be the one granted by the hardware. Therefore, the call to arch_set_freq_scale() is a "best effort" one, and it is up to the architecture if the new frequency is used in the new frequency scale factor setting (determined by the implementation of arch_set_freq_scale()) or eventually used by the scheduler (determined by the implementation of arch_scale_freq_capacity()). The architecture is in a better position to decide if it has better methods to obtain more accurate information regarding the current frequency and use that information instead (for example, the use of counters). Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 10 +--------- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++--- drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 9 +-------- drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 12 ++---------- drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c | 6 +----- drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c | 5 ----- 6 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c index 944d7b45afe9..9fd4ce774f12 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c @@ -40,16 +40,8 @@ static int set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) { struct private_data *priv = policy->driver_data; unsigned long freq = policy->freq_table[index].frequency; - int ret; - - ret = dev_pm_opp_set_rate(priv->cpu_dev, freq * 1000); - if (!ret) { - arch_set_freq_scale(policy->related_cpus, freq, - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq); - } - - return ret; + return dev_pm_opp_set_rate(priv->cpu_dev, freq * 1000); } /* diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 036f4cc42ede..bac4101546db 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -2058,9 +2058,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_unregister_notifier); unsigned int cpufreq_driver_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq) { + unsigned int freq; + target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, policy->min, policy->max); + freq = cpufreq_driver->fast_switch(policy, target_freq); + + if (freq) + arch_set_freq_scale(policy->related_cpus, freq, + policy->cpuinfo.max_freq); - return cpufreq_driver->fast_switch(policy, target_freq); + return freq; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_driver_fast_switch); @@ -2152,7 +2159,7 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int relation) { unsigned int old_target_freq = target_freq; - int index; + int index, retval; if (cpufreq_disabled()) return -ENODEV; @@ -2183,7 +2190,14 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, index = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, target_freq, relation); - return __target_index(policy, index); + retval = __target_index(policy, index); + + if (!retval) + arch_set_freq_scale(policy->related_cpus, + policy->freq_table[index].frequency, + policy->cpuinfo.max_freq); + + return retval; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__cpufreq_driver_target); diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c index 573630c23aca..e5d1ee7746a4 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c @@ -85,8 +85,6 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, if (icc_scaling_enabled) qcom_cpufreq_set_bw(policy, freq); - arch_set_freq_scale(policy->related_cpus, freq, - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq); return 0; } @@ -113,7 +111,6 @@ static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, { void __iomem *perf_state_reg = policy->driver_data; int index; - unsigned long freq; index = policy->cached_resolved_idx; if (index < 0) @@ -121,11 +118,7 @@ static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, writel_relaxed(index, perf_state_reg); - freq = policy->freq_table[index].frequency; - arch_set_freq_scale(policy->related_cpus, freq, - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq); - - return freq; + return policy->freq_table[index].frequency; } static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev, diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c index fb42e3390377..6dd1311660b5 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c @@ -48,16 +48,11 @@ static unsigned int scmi_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpu) static int scmi_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) { - int ret; struct scmi_data *priv = policy->driver_data; struct scmi_perf_ops *perf_ops = handle->perf_ops; u64 freq = policy->freq_table[index].frequency; - ret = perf_ops->freq_set(handle, priv->domain_id, freq * 1000, false); - if (!ret) - arch_set_freq_scale(policy->related_cpus, freq, - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq); - return ret; + return perf_ops->freq_set(handle, priv->domain_id, freq * 1000, false); } static unsigned int scmi_cpufreq_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, @@ -67,11 +62,8 @@ static unsigned int scmi_cpufreq_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, struct scmi_perf_ops *perf_ops = handle->perf_ops; if (!perf_ops->freq_set(handle, priv->domain_id, - target_freq * 1000, true)) { - arch_set_freq_scale(policy->related_cpus, target_freq, - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq); + target_freq * 1000, true)) return target_freq; - } return 0; } diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c index b0f5388b8854..43db05b949d9 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c @@ -47,9 +47,8 @@ static unsigned int scpi_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpu) static int scpi_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) { - unsigned long freq = policy->freq_table[index].frequency; + u64 rate = policy->freq_table[index].frequency * 1000; struct scpi_data *priv = policy->driver_data; - u64 rate = freq * 1000; int ret; ret = clk_set_rate(priv->clk, rate); @@ -60,9 +59,6 @@ scpi_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) if (clk_get_rate(priv->clk) != rate) return -EIO; - arch_set_freq_scale(policy->related_cpus, freq, - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq); - return 0; } diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c index 4e8b1dee7c9a..313bb9db369b 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c @@ -200,11 +200,6 @@ static int ve_spc_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, ret = ve_spc_cpufreq_set_rate(cpu, actual_cluster, new_cluster, freqs_new); - if (!ret) { - arch_set_freq_scale(policy->related_cpus, freqs_new, - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq); - } - return ret; } -- 2.17.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel