From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2D1C433E4 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:06:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC890206D7 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:06:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="Qcc/jaU4"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="EOC3+Vjv" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EC890206D7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=5cl/fhM8yrOgyi+H01SOvne0C5irYmYFNNyBW5nFli4=; b=Qcc/jaU4p62KhXwfR5HusWmy1 Wk2Cv4ROZJm2SrJv0Ux/RgPE5bXCb2ntoa7yGePhNQG1YI7+pakORiozJEYLZxNRdBrssNDKV3NPK AELH36b9I93Dwi8BukNxyxZfQvjqrrDSLO1dtSTAXcmj1RrTqP8bw+S1x9UF43E5GOC/FO+rtNNGH JYJ2doqGaTLX6A+ziljOXShOsGoyJ+j6s0ePOmlcPjAh9Ut6mMDW9lAgVVn6bkiAoI5k0MkP8kPD4 yTggnLEP9kNfkxNIJeaLZedCwvymom1IvEKGXkmMnSjb7nxJTy7rL4+K6D+00FIIVQam04BQxfoDH dOHtYqwSg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k0NPz-000688-Re; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:05:12 +0000 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81] helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k0NPq-00064R-AF for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:05:04 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1595934301; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KbH/+n2HvZybv5SHoykd6djdgy/t/5KkFVDCxrMDM1E=; b=EOC3+VjvG0ytpLgxvYRbWfjMpGkuZkeP6MvS5caBAhTxJYcZgORX1LyHOILviBHhBrMyPM 8pIFj596nMgTVZKR8j/BNSu7FGWNcfBGmpG7u5nBjXdrQMzJPSoIetyO3Gfzj7fhYMqbNJ buIWRDfh/33ycmfaY4LattCiQnzVpf4= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-230-YtpimbUANf-rLILSqHuJcA-1; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 07:03:08 -0400 X-MC-Unique: YtpimbUANf-rLILSqHuJcA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA57C800597; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-13-103.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.13.103]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BD995DA33; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:02:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 19:02:54 +0800 From: Baoquan He To: Mike Rapoport Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/15] x86/numa: remove redundant iteration over memblock.reserved Message-ID: <20200728110254.GA14854@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> References: <20200728051153.1590-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20200728051153.1590-15-rppt@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200728051153.1590-15-rppt@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200728_070502_545833_87AB9E94 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 27.03 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Dave Hansen , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Max Filippov , Paul Mackerras , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Will Deacon , Stafford Horne , Marek Szyprowski , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, Yoshinori Sato , Michael Ellerman , x86@kernel.org, Russell King , Mike Rapoport , clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, Ingo Molnar , Catalin Marinas , uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org, Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Paul Walmsley , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Michal Simek , linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Palmer Dabbelt , Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 07/28/20 at 08:11am, Mike Rapoport wrote: > From: Mike Rapoport > > numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug() function first traverses numa_meminfo > regions to set node ID in memblock.reserved and than traverses > memblock.reserved to update reserved_nodemask to include node IDs that were > set in the first loop. > > Remove redundant traversal over memblock.reserved and update > reserved_nodemask while iterating over numa_meminfo. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport > --- > arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 26 ++++++++++---------------- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c > index 8ee952038c80..4078abd33938 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c > @@ -498,31 +498,25 @@ static void __init numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug(void) > * and use those ranges to set the nid in memblock.reserved. > * This will split up the memblock regions along node > * boundaries and will set the node IDs as well. > + * > + * The nid will also be set in reserved_nodemask which is later > + * used to clear MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG flag. > + * > + * [ Note, when booting with mem=nn[kMG] or in a kdump kernel, > + * numa_meminfo might not include all memblock.reserved > + * memory ranges, because quirks such as trim_snb_memory() > + * reserve specific pages for Sandy Bridge graphics. > + * These ranges will remain with nid == MAX_NUMNODES. ] > */ > for (i = 0; i < numa_meminfo.nr_blks; i++) { > struct numa_memblk *mb = numa_meminfo.blk + i; > int ret; > > ret = memblock_set_node(mb->start, mb->end - mb->start, &memblock.reserved, mb->nid); > + node_set(mb->nid, reserved_nodemask); Really? This will set all node id into reserved_nodemask. But in the current code, it's setting nid into memblock reserved region which interleaves with numa_memoinfo, then get those nid and set it in reserved_nodemask. This is so different, with my understanding. Please correct me if I am wrong. Thanks Baoquan > WARN_ON_ONCE(ret); > } > > - /* > - * Now go over all reserved memblock regions, to construct a > - * node mask of all kernel reserved memory areas. > - * > - * [ Note, when booting with mem=nn[kMG] or in a kdump kernel, > - * numa_meminfo might not include all memblock.reserved > - * memory ranges, because quirks such as trim_snb_memory() > - * reserve specific pages for Sandy Bridge graphics. ] > - */ > - for_each_memblock(reserved, mb_region) { > - int nid = memblock_get_region_node(mb_region); > - > - if (nid != MAX_NUMNODES) > - node_set(nid, reserved_nodemask); > - } > - > /* > * Finally, clear the MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG flag for all memory > * belonging to the reserved node mask. > -- > 2.26.2 > > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel