From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42B5C433DF for ; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 07:51:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BE0520725 for ; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 07:51:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="fESHzOqm" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8BE0520725 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=hisilicon.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender :Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Owner; bh=/biXSAV2uburwDT6W7l+9T/s+QvkDexj2HgTpNciSUs=; b=fESHzOqmFroy5zsvAbyvPP6wfK SDpZ8uegENbW3yN8R4Yp0X8fUInKCrSJnV5QZmA22f64E6UAyR+WUKbg6qWk2tDQG96OjaI3q6eu0 tOPB0Q3Cg2Kg9ljb695h8SsnzRW1KOD32KNCLmq7r9rshsLvlTnY3C6aCDFoYPNt2A3rNgtd08KnU Yhyv2YOLTVurw6y9WJ5sziNk5CisQU7AmGHFy3WtXLXJMKLDA9AUErw147FB72RWumjnrzUr92Tzb F+eApNrZFGyvjTLGc/4PghItA35ivwLB2mzQKvMxN4AXtMhA+v0knmj29im161LMjTE3+wnvHeYqP 77zyA/og==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k1mH7-0001yZ-Tb; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 07:49:49 +0000 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32] helo=huawei.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k1mH4-0001xM-Gn for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 07:49:47 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 333A09CFD358CB65929F; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 15:49:33 +0800 (CST) Received: from SWX921481.china.huawei.com (10.126.203.235) by DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.207) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 15:49:23 +0800 From: Barry Song To: , , , Subject: [PATCH v3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: permit users to disable MSI polling Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2020 19:47:03 +1200 Message-ID: <20200801074703.17108-1-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0.windows.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.126.203.235] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200801_034946_807593_CBDE1B8E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.20 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Barry Song , prime.zeng@hisilicon.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Polling by MSI isn't necessarily faster than polling by SEV. Tests on hi1620 show hns3 100G NIC network throughput can improve from 25G to 27G if we disable MSI polling while running 16 netperf threads sending UDP packets in size 32KB. This patch provides a command line option so that users can decide to use MSI polling or not based on their tests. Signed-off-by: Barry Song --- -v3: * rebase on top of linux-next as arm-smmu-v3.c has moved; * provide a command line option drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 18 ++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c index 7196207be7ea..89d3cb391fef 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c @@ -418,6 +418,11 @@ module_param_named(disable_bypass, disable_bypass, bool, S_IRUGO); MODULE_PARM_DESC(disable_bypass, "Disable bypass streams such that incoming transactions from devices that are not attached to an iommu domain will report an abort back to the device and will not be allowed to pass through the SMMU."); +static bool disable_msipolling; +module_param_named(disable_msipolling, disable_msipolling, bool, S_IRUGO); +MODULE_PARM_DESC(disable_msipolling, + "Disable MSI-based polling for CMD_SYNC completion."); + enum pri_resp { PRI_RESP_DENY = 0, PRI_RESP_FAIL = 1, @@ -980,6 +985,13 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(u64 *cmd, struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent) return 0; } +static bool arm_smmu_use_msipolling(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu) +{ + return !disable_msipolling && + smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENCY && + smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_MSI; +} + static void arm_smmu_cmdq_build_sync_cmd(u64 *cmd, struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 prod) { @@ -992,8 +1004,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_cmdq_build_sync_cmd(u64 *cmd, struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, * Beware that Hi16xx adds an extra 32 bits of goodness to its MSI * payload, so the write will zero the entire command on that platform. */ - if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_MSI && - smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENCY) { + if (arm_smmu_use_msipolling(smmu)) { ent.sync.msiaddr = q->base_dma + Q_IDX(&q->llq, prod) * q->ent_dwords * 8; } @@ -1332,8 +1343,7 @@ static int __arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_consumed(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, static int arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *llq) { - if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_MSI && - smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENCY) + if (arm_smmu_use_msipolling(smmu)) return __arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_msi(smmu, llq); return __arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_consumed(smmu, llq); -- 2.27.0 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel