From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0113C433E1 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:12:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C290522CA1 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:12:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="zShSHBaK"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="PKa1vVZ2" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C290522CA1 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Wt+F2Pghg/ckac/+d+pVacpDSaQSD+6sjpYVFrO4TTg=; b=zShSHBaKG/XlK4/L08ohYqjdM w8Yo4mclbXWPtdf5iolNBcD4YTZef/fzd5G+Mi0buk242fgamsT7Y+PYAPf8hfQMBXODElgzrX60A odCl3yq0ZJgT/69xYqRS4uwojTGufEpZxMmIs/jft3buzyBhDTDhIa3UFjKTJEL3vTj5CWJ/elU07 c6n7KwW8F/yFxBJ0NWxip4PHBxrqKrrqhU0ZyyfLxphebtMU4UnOAcNNZCidmYDaP/PwfJCbooZHP mggoCNL+YfU55UlUpktDqlgz4bIffignsEaMDncLaz0t5hxfNFGhp0E99ekzfakKSr4JsAdG428JW yD4t/UWLw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k3FSG-0006WP-Bx; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 09:11:24 +0000 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120] helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k3FSD-0006Uq-Fl for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 09:11:22 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1596618680; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4ozBDa1/xPHY8DQkaA9JqUMmSyVVQ14zD1Crd0znMso=; b=PKa1vVZ2ktwBbfJkH7uBUaodNzgQ70N4m/jCCX7g/UIAZUY8lbCvw7c9g+fCCXqVyht8ex 9nC4o/YKAN4lSfzxNsQjmVN66prsFkDwEUcJYUhezxiXCa9yG0tA9vq0Ik9tc6LfFXIAx8 0LsaCfLZyY43EVbe7qQasoabcd3WOxU= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-16-yG35Dv0sMVyPaqKEAb-z_A-1; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 05:11:16 -0400 X-MC-Unique: yG35Dv0sMVyPaqKEAb-z_A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB37818C63C1; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:11:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-12-71.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.71]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2D2772E4F; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:11:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 17:11:05 +0800 From: Baoquan He To: Mike Rapoport Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/17] memblock: implement for_each_reserved_mem_region() using __next_mem_region() Message-ID: <20200805091105.GW10792@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> References: <20200802163601.8189-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20200802163601.8189-17-rppt@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200802163601.8189-17-rppt@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200805_051121_602563_DEB429F7 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.29 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Emil Renner Berthing , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Dave Hansen , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Max Filippov , Paul Mackerras , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Will Deacon , Stafford Horne , Marek Szyprowski , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, Yoshinori Sato , Michael Ellerman , x86@kernel.org, Russell King , Mike Rapoport , clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, Ingo Molnar , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Catalin Marinas , uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org, Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Paul Walmsley , Thomas Gleixner , Hari Bathini , Michal Simek , linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Palmer Dabbelt , Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 08/02/20 at 07:36pm, Mike Rapoport wrote: > From: Mike Rapoport > > Iteration over memblock.reserved with for_each_reserved_mem_region() used > __next_reserved_mem_region() that implemented a subset of > __next_mem_region(). > > Use __for_each_mem_range() and, essentially, __next_mem_region() with > appropriate parameters to reduce code duplication. > > While on it, rename for_each_reserved_mem_region() to > for_each_reserved_mem_range() for consistency. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport > --- > .clang-format | 2 +- > arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 2 +- > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 2 +- > include/linux/memblock.h | 12 +++------ > mm/memblock.c | 46 +++++++------------------------- > 5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Baoquan He _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel