From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B37C433E0 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 16:04:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37C4A23444 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 16:04:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="g4aqBV7R" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 37C4A23444 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=tuXL+30fnJvcb+qb+wmr9VQX3bVrHKaZ+Bz2gmIILtU=; b=g4aqBV7R+tH5cCSvd+/DO6IBY hOEhUkdGIknHNj3xgerJLLqheGtkKpZKf/Qg9+ZuoKh7nhf10t0bEP8ozxbqxza/a0GmhC6o35WA/ aIE6fyPSuXJ42YyWqZccMJrEnTp61rLEZEkGowm2U9r+UfhV4DftMl7WzYm7nrpy1AyLwTu4xTVeB KX366AreRfda7GqdvJoLLFo+FyNIxkH1nLegPxkjRqyAmb3s66yy9uIRUcTMSOa9cDfA3h6QZHFDz /Z2cWzDZN8GzznH/sWOsq2AZYzw8kaNYCMsWCW/BX7sOfoVxj8Ccq4vgqiNC6Mrlmi3bkqN+tUNxA TGGtldh0A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k3Lt5-0000kq-WD; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 16:03:32 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k3Lt2-0000jc-2n for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 16:03:29 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B93E91424; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:03:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (unknown [10.37.12.53]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ADCEE3F7D7; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:03:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 17:03:12 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq statistics retrieved by drivers Message-ID: <20200805160312.GC4818@bogus> References: <20200729151208.27737-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com> <119ce268-18dc-7a4c-b0b2-3a66ff9ff4b0@arm.com> <20200805130436.3d2g7z2rsdoesuuk@vireshk-mac-ubuntu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200805130436.3d2g7z2rsdoesuuk@vireshk-mac-ubuntu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200805_120328_196827_61FFD116 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.99 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Florian Fainelli , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cristian.marussi@arm.com, Sudeep Holla , Lukasz Luba , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 06:34:36PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 05-08-20, 12:04, Lukasz Luba wrote: > > I know that Viresh is going to develop patches and improve these > > cpufreq stats framework. Maybe he also had this 'aggregation' in mind. > > I will leave it him. > > I am only going to look at cpufreq's view of stats independently from > the firmware. > +1, I agree with that. Kernel must avoid any logic to aggregate or interpret the data in a generic way. The userspace tools can manage that especially if this tend to be platform specific. -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel