From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BD6C433E2 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 13:08:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63FB120665 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 13:08:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="shn/Eaax"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="h6hW5yaR" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 63FB120665 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=TFiqwCwRIGclIqnHdNXcQGuWdh/nveXUrfNh1Esod5M=; b=shn/EaaxPRnk+lFfqRAHs3M+7 cbg+pTgb8po0B50xuBr3463crWI/GWU883v+QUmsssD6MpED5ul72SD4T8wNzvaN1rrjELJBT/pwf 0YPlHaRQL5/Ttg1L4Lo2q9g7lQ+dLfG/jZZF1NJNRc/Q42sNZviDvV1m4kNfqA86K2V8wKPkbA2LL xu1mSqj5pIfkddo+mFNZPEKQpXpcAyOypABhThXpylMPn8YnZ2V9X/PQXrfFf+15wUJbEjvLI7aEe 4fi1NzAZgGHfrYWt5yb7UeoNLyBm39+wgKM1OXtB9iZvfyYf9MgRBZFrMLongJh4KnAiZFlbc6qog Hce20HinQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kBe65-0001gU-2F; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 13:07:13 +0000 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kBe62-0001g0-Ab for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 13:07:11 +0000 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07SD78NA041901; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:07:08 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1598620028; bh=ekVVOEWqdgbGbUmbraegt5QvlLGNEUCePCEa+IFZYP4=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=h6hW5yaRX5gi/dKUHVJbd6+5XEu51buMJcM6mX2tqtS8kKeaChcnRzoBW7544Qdhm t7bHyUUrv2ErG/AOa/uy+OG0x3qiC3VySAE4MtZTXVMwoyPnOIrtEDU8Zf1dXLiuD8 ZQvjLO5emljhoPJhuTeq05tAUqFB0ZoQ8fnYNGYs= Received: from DFLE103.ent.ti.com (dfle103.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.24]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 07SD78xV130749 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:07:08 -0500 Received: from DFLE106.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.27) by DFLE103.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:07:07 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DFLE106.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:07:07 -0500 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07SD77KX025722; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:07:07 -0500 Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:07:07 -0500 From: Nishanth Menon To: Lokesh Vutla Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: arm: ti: Convert K3 board/soc bindings to DT schema Message-ID: <20200828130707.gwjh7zht3om72qxe@akan> References: <20200827065144.17683-1-lokeshvutla@ti.com> <20200827065144.17683-2-lokeshvutla@ti.com> <20200828004105.givypeu3vextefc6@akan> <1c9508ce-9336-e20a-5b58-5dd257247273@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1c9508ce-9336-e20a-5b58-5dd257247273@ti.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200828_090710_531130_BDFF2EDE X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.82 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Device Tree Mailing List , Grygorii Strashko , Sekhar Nori , Tero Kristo , Rob Herring , Linux ARM Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 08:44-20200828, Lokesh Vutla wrote: > Hi Nishanth, > > On 28/08/20 6:11 am, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > On 12:21-20200827, Lokesh Vutla wrote: > >> Convert TI K3 Board/SoC bindings to DT schema format. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla > >> --- > >> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.txt | 26 ---------------- > >> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml | 31 +++++++++++++++++++ > >> MAINTAINERS | 2 +- > >> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > >> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.txt > >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml > > > > > > Thanks for doing this, but I have a problem with dbs_check and dtbs > > W=2 build warnings on existing dts files that this exposes further.. > > IMHO, that should not block the conversion to yaml bindings. May I know the > problem you are seeing? Things are starting to literally bitrot and I saw Rob's[1] attempt to try and clean up the cruft of warnings we had introduced. we should fix all that up before introducing new platforms. I am going to see how much cleanup I can do today, but will help if more folks pitch in. > > > Do you mind pulling this patch out of this j7200 series ? I would > > rather us cleanup the warnings a bit as well, and deal with yaml > > conversion seperate from j7200 bindings? > > Ill wait for Rob's view on this. He already asked to convert it during J721e > binding update. Not sure we would like to delay any further. > Sure. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/CAL_JsqLqVdyKkVKJP0EG7s7m4A=r-+DjY+X4kVs9boFfPoHsfw@mail.gmail.com/#r -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel